Jafarpour Dana, El-Amier Nesma, Tahboub Kawkab, Zimmermann Elizabeth, Pero Ana Carolina, de Souza Raphael
PhD Candidate, Faculty of Dental Medicine and Oral Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
PhD Candidate, Faculty of Dental Medicine and Oral Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; and Assistant Lecturer, Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
J Prosthet Dent. 2025 Jul;134(1):239.e1-239.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2025.02.035. Epub 2025 Mar 19.
The variety of recommended postprocessing techniques and printing parameters makes it challenging to determine the best approach to 3-dimensionally (3D) printed dentures.
The purpose of this in vitro study was to assess the effect of printing orientations (0, 45, and 90 degrees) and postprocessing treatments (ultraviolet [UV], heat, or combination) on the mechanical and surface properties of 3D printed denture base resin.
Three-dimensionally printed denture base resin specimens were fabricated at 0-, 45-, and 90-degree printing orientations, followed by 4 postprocessing techniques (UV, Heat, UV+Heat, and control). Microhardness was assessed using a Vickers microhardness tester. Additionally, the flexural strength (FS) and modulus of elasticity (MoE) were analyzed using a 3-point bend test. Wettability was measured according to the sessile drop test. The fractured surfaces were observed under scanning electron microscopy (SEM).
FS was significantly greater (P<.001) at a print orientation of 90 degrees (73.7 MPa) compared with 0 and 45 degrees (55.2 and 61.8 MPa). No significant difference in FS was found among postprocessing treatments (all complied with the International Organization for Standardization [ISO] requirements). The UV group had the highest MoE (up to 2061 MPa), followed by the heat-treated groups (up to 1412 MPa). The 45-degree print orientation showed the highest contact angle (CA) in almost all groups (CA=117.6±11.7), and UV led to higher hydrophilicity (CA=33.9±12.0). The effect of build orientation on the microhardness depended on the postprocessing technique with the highest value (23.4 ±1.3) achieved by UV postprocessing in combination with the 90-degree orientation.
The optimal FS of 3D printed denture base resin is achieved when it is printed in a vertical orientation (90 degrees relative to the platform base). Thermal annealing as a postprocessing technique combined with UV can effectively enhance FS, induce favorable wettability, and reduce stiffness.
推荐的后处理技术和打印参数种类繁多,这使得确定三维(3D)打印假牙的最佳方法具有挑战性。
本体外研究的目的是评估打印方向(0、45和90度)和后处理方法(紫外线[UV]、加热或联合处理)对3D打印义齿基托树脂力学性能和表面性能的影响。
以0度、45度和90度的打印方向制作3D打印义齿基托树脂标本,然后采用4种后处理技术(UV、加热、UV+加热和对照)。使用维氏显微硬度计评估显微硬度。此外,使用三点弯曲试验分析弯曲强度(FS)和弹性模量(MoE)。根据静滴试验测量润湿性。在扫描电子显微镜(SEM)下观察断裂表面。
与0度和45度(55.2和61.8MPa)相比,90度打印方向的FS显著更高(P<.001)(73.7MPa)。后处理方法之间的FS无显著差异(均符合国际标准化组织[ISO]要求)。UV组的MoE最高(高达2061MPa),其次是热处理组(高达1412MPa)。45度打印方向在几乎所有组中显示出最高的接触角(CA)(CA=117.6±11.7),而UV导致更高的亲水性(CA=33.9±12.0)。构建方向对显微硬度的影响取决于后处理技术,UV后处理与90度方向相结合可达到最高值(23.4±1.3)。
3D打印义齿基托树脂垂直方向(相对于平台基座90度)打印时可实现最佳FS。热退火作为一种后处理技术与UV相结合可有效提高FS,诱导良好的润湿性并降低硬度。