• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

危险休克样特征可预测ST段抬高型心肌梗死相关心源性休克的预后。

DanGer Shock-like profile predicts the outcome in ST-elevation myocardial infarction-related cardiogenic shock.

作者信息

Mangner Norman, Mierke Johannes, Baron Dominik, Woitek Felix J, Haussig Stephan, Nowack Thomas, Winzer Ephraim B, Fischer Julia, Höllriegel Robert, Jellinghaus Stefanie, Linke Axel

机构信息

Department for Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Heart Centre Dresden, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany.

出版信息

ESC Heart Fail. 2025 Aug;12(4):2759-2768. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.15269. Epub 2025 Mar 19.

DOI:10.1002/ehf2.15269
PMID:40108949
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12287854/
Abstract

AIMS

The DanGer Shock (DGS) trial demonstrated that the routine use of a microaxial flow pump (mAFP) with standard care to treat STEMI-related cardiogenic shock (STEMI-CS) led to a lower risk of all-cause death at 180 days than standard care alone. We investigated the impact of patient eligibility for DGS in an all-comers cardiogenic shock registry of patients receiving a mAFP.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Prospective single-centre mAFP registry including 478 CS-patients with 225 patients having STEMI-CS. DGS-like was defined as STEMI-CS, lactate ≥2.5 mmol/L, left ventricular ejection fraction < 45%, no mechanical complications, and no comatose out-of-hospital cardiac arrest but in-hospital cardiac arrest with a maximum of 10 min to return of spontaneous circulation as a surrogate for medically witnessed cardiac arrest was included. The comparison group consisted of STEMI-CS patients who did not fulfil the aforementioned criteria (DGS-unlike). The primary outcome was 180-day mortality. Out of 225 STEMI-CS, 64 (28.4%) patients were considered DGS-like. Those patients were younger, had less often received CPR before mAFP implantation, and mAFP-support was longer. Comorbidities, baseline lactate, coronary artery disease characteristics/treatment, inotropes/vasopressors, and escalation to other mechanical circulatory support devices were not different. All-cause mortality at 180 days was significantly lower in the DGS-like compared to the DGS-unlike cohort (62.5% vs. 72.0%, P = 0.014) as was 30-day all-cause mortality (48.4% vs. 70.2%, P < 0.001). DGS-like remained an independent predictor of both 180-day (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.39, 0.83) and 30-day mortality (HR 0.48, 95% CI 0.32, 0.72) in a multivariable analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

A DGS-like profile was associated with a lower 180-day mortality compared with a DGS-unlike profile in a STEMI-CS cohort treated by mAFP.

摘要

目的

“危险休克”(DGS)试验表明,在治疗ST段抬高型心肌梗死相关的心源性休克(STEMI-CS)时,常规使用微轴流泵(mAFP)联合标准治疗,与单纯标准治疗相比,180天时全因死亡风险更低。我们在一个接受mAFP治疗的所有心源性休克患者登记处,研究了符合DGS标准的患者情况的影响。

方法和结果

前瞻性单中心mAFP登记处纳入了478例心源性休克患者,其中225例为STEMI-CS患者。类似DGS的情况定义为STEMI-CS、乳酸水平≥2.5 mmol/L、左心室射血分数<45%、无机械并发症、无院外心脏骤停昏迷但有院内心脏骤停且自主循环恢复时间最长为10分钟,将其作为医学见证心脏骤停的替代情况纳入。对照组由不符合上述标准的STEMI-CS患者(非类似DGS情况)组成。主要结局是180天死亡率。在225例STEMI-CS患者中,64例(28.4%)被认为类似DGS情况。这些患者更年轻,在植入mAFP前接受心肺复苏的情况较少,且mAFP支持时间更长。合并症、基线乳酸水平、冠状动脉疾病特征/治疗、血管活性药物使用情况以及升级使用其他机械循环支持设备的情况并无差异。与非类似DGS队列相比,类似DGS队列180天的全因死亡率显著更低(62.5%对72.0%,P = 0.014),30天全因死亡率也是如此(48.4%对70.2%,P < 0.001)。在多变量分析中,类似DGS情况仍然是180天(风险比0.57,95%置信区间0.39,0.83)和30天死亡率(风险比0.48,95%置信区间0.32,0.72)的独立预测因素。

结论

在接受mAFP治疗的STEMI-CS队列中,与非类似DGS情况相比,类似DGS情况与更低的180天死亡率相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5057/12287854/7017549e1f1a/EHF2-12-2759-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5057/12287854/048050f20309/EHF2-12-2759-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5057/12287854/1c3616ae1e14/EHF2-12-2759-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5057/12287854/7017549e1f1a/EHF2-12-2759-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5057/12287854/048050f20309/EHF2-12-2759-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5057/12287854/1c3616ae1e14/EHF2-12-2759-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5057/12287854/7017549e1f1a/EHF2-12-2759-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
DanGer Shock-like profile predicts the outcome in ST-elevation myocardial infarction-related cardiogenic shock.危险休克样特征可预测ST段抬高型心肌梗死相关心源性休克的预后。
ESC Heart Fail. 2025 Aug;12(4):2759-2768. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.15269. Epub 2025 Mar 19.
2
Effect of Microaxial Flow Pump on Hemodynamics in STEMI-Related Cardiogenic Shock.微轴流泵对ST段抬高型心肌梗死相关心源性休克血流动力学的影响。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2025 Jul 1;85(25):2456-2468. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2025.04.062.
3
Microaxial Flow Pump or Standard Care in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock.微轴流泵与常规治疗在梗死相关性心源性休克中的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2024 Apr 18;390(15):1382-1393. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2312572. Epub 2024 Apr 7.
4
Development of an Acute Coronary Syndrome-Cardiogenic Shock Risk Score for 30-day Mortality From the Victorian Cardiac Outcomes Registry (VCOR ACS-CS Risk Score).基于维多利亚心脏结局登记处(VCOR ACS-CS风险评分)制定的急性冠状动脉综合征-心源性休克30天死亡率风险评分
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Apr 23. doi: 10.1002/ccd.31540.
5
Impact of off-hours admissions in STEMI-related cardiogenic shock managed with microaxial flow pump - insights from J-PVAD.微轴流泵辅助治疗 STEMI 相关心源性休克患者非工作时间入院的影响:J-PVAD 的研究结果
EuroIntervention. 2024 Aug 19;20(16):987-995. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00331.
6
Timing of mechanical ventilation and its association with in-hospital outcomes in patients with cardiogenic shock following ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a multicentre observational study.ST段抬高型心肌梗死后心源性休克患者机械通气的时机及其与院内结局的关联:一项多中心观察性研究
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 4;15(6):e099208. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099208.
7
Microaxial flow-pump support in patients with cardiogenic shock: a review of the literature.心源性休克患者的微轴流泵支持:文献综述
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2025 Aug 1;31(4):464-472. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000001279. Epub 2025 May 2.
8
The impact of chronic total occlusion in non-infarct related arteries on patient outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention for STEMI superimposed with cardiogenic shock: A pilot systematic review and meta-analysis.非梗死相关动脉慢性完全闭塞对 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死合并心原性休克患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后结局的影响:一项初步系统评价和荟萃分析。
Curr Probl Cardiol. 2024 Feb;49(2):102237. doi: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2023.102237. Epub 2023 Nov 30.
9
Model for end-stage liver disease incorporating albumin score is associated with short- and long-term all-cause mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.纳入白蛋白评分的终末期肝病模型与急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克患者的短期和长期全因死亡率相关。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2025 Jul 3;14(6):342-350. doi: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuaf063.
10
Multicentre comparison of various microaxial pump devices as a bridge to durable assist device implantation.作为耐用辅助装置植入桥梁的各种微轴流泵装置的多中心比较。
ESC Heart Fail. 2025 Aug;12(4):2552-2564. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.15282. Epub 2025 Apr 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Treating Older Patients in Cardiogenic Shock With a Microaxial Flow Pump: Is it DANGERous?使用微轴流泵治疗心源性休克的老年患者:这危险吗?
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2025 Feb 18;85(6):595-603. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2024.11.003. Epub 2024 Nov 15.
2
Microaxial Flow Pump Use and Renal Outcomes in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock: A Secondary Analysis of the DanGer Shock Trial.微轴流泵在梗死相关心源性休克中的应用及肾脏结局:DanGer休克试验的二次分析
Circulation. 2024 Dec 17;150(25):1990-2003. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.124.072370. Epub 2024 Oct 27.
3
Microaxial Flow Pump Hemodynamic and Metabolic Effects in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock: A Substudy of the DanGer Shock Randomized Clinical Trial.
微轴流泵在梗死相关心源性休克中的血流动力学和代谢效应:DanGer休克随机临床试验的一项子研究
JAMA Cardiol. 2025 Jan 1;10(1):9-16. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2024.4197.
4
Using Selection Criteria From the DanGer Shock Trial in a Contemporary Cohort With Cardiogenic Shock.在当代心源性休克队列中运用来自Danger休克试验的入选标准。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2024 Dec 17;84(25):2490-2493. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2024.08.056. Epub 2024 Oct 9.
5
Sex-Related Differences in Outcome of Patients Treated With Microaxial Percutaneous Left Ventricular Assist Device for Cardiogenic Shock.接受微轴经皮左心室辅助装置治疗的心源性休克患者结局的性别差异
Heart Lung Circ. 2024 Dec;33(12):1670-1679. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2024.07.010. Epub 2024 Oct 5.
6
Temporary mechanical circulatory support in infarct-related cardiogenic shock: an individual patient data meta-analysis of randomised trials with 6-month follow-up.梗死相关心原性休克的临时机械循环支持:6 个月随访的随机试验的个体患者数据荟萃分析。
Lancet. 2024 Sep 14;404(10457):1019-1028. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)01448-X. Epub 2024 Sep 2.
7
Do DanGer-SHOCK-like patients benefit from VA-ECMO treatment in infarct-related cardiogenic shock? results of an individual patient data meta-analysis.丹格休克样患者在梗死相关心源性休克中从 VA-ECMO 治疗中获益吗?一项个体患者数据荟萃分析的结果。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2024 Sep 25;13(9):658-661. doi: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuae093.
8
Rates of Sudden Death After Myocardial Infarction-Insights From the VALIANT and PARADISE-MI Trials.心肌梗死后的猝死率——来自 VALIANT 和 PARADISE-MI 试验的观察。
JAMA Cardiol. 2024 Oct 1;9(10):928-933. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2024.2356.
9
Microaxial Flow Pump or Standard Care in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock.微轴流泵与常规治疗在梗死相关性心源性休克中的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2024 Apr 18;390(15):1382-1393. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2312572. Epub 2024 Apr 7.
10
Early Utilization of Mechanical Circulatory Support in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock: The National Cardiogenic Shock Initiative.急性心肌梗死并发心源性休克患者机械循环支持的早期应用:国家心源性休克倡议。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 Dec 5;12(23):e031401. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.031401. Epub 2023 Nov 28.