Wang Hui, Huang Qin, Tian Qingqing, Yang Weiwei, Liu Anran, Tang Jiayang, Zhang Hailin, Wu Chunlin
Department of Hospital Infection Control and Public Health, Sichuan Cancer Hospital, Chengdu, China.
Front Public Health. 2025 Mar 5;13:1543375. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1543375. eCollection 2025.
To analyze the results and current status of hospital infection monitoring and quality control work at a tertiary specialized cancer hospital, providing references for further improvement of HAI monitoring quality.
Combined information-based monitoring with manual quality control measures for hospital infection surveillance, collecting data such as hospital infection report cards and missed reports to analyze the current status of hospital infection monitoring. Starting from January 2023, further comprehensive quality control measures were taken, and data before and after the implementation were compared to evaluate the effectiveness of the quality control work.
After the implementation of comprehensive management measures, the incidence rate of hospital infection in the hospital decreased from 0.60 to 0.52%, the correct rate of early warning disposal increased from 85.31 to 89.53%, and the handling rate within 24 h of early warning increased from 20.51 to 72.99%. All these differences are statistically significant ( < 0.05). After the comprehensive management measures were adopted, more missed cases were detected and reported, resulting in an increase in the missed reporting rate from 5.36 to 12.33% ( < 0.05). While the number of reports increased, the accuracy of the reports decreased from 67.54 to 54.05% ( < 0.05).
Information systems can enhance the efficiency of hospital infection surveillance through real-time monitoring and automatic early warning, improve the quality of reporting, and thereby contribute to the reduction of the incidence rate of hospital infections. However, the quality of monitoring is still influenced by human factors such as whether the early warning rules are scientifically set and whether the determination of hospital infections is accurate. There may be situations where the missed reporting rate is underestimated and the quality of the report cards is not high. This indicates that while adopting information-based monitoring, we cannot ignore the management of quality control. It is necessary to continuously strengthen the investigation of missed reporting, improve the quality of report cards, and ensure the authenticity and accuracy of the results of hospital infection monitoring.
分析某三级肿瘤专科医院医院感染监测及质量控制工作的结果与现状,为进一步提高医院感染监测质量提供参考。
采用信息化监测与人工质量控制措施相结合的方式进行医院感染监测,收集医院感染报告卡、漏报等数据,分析医院感染监测现状。自2023年1月起,采取进一步的综合质量控制措施,比较实施前后的数据,评估质量控制工作的效果。
实施综合管理措施后,医院医院感染发病率由0.60%降至0.52%,预警处置正确率由85.31%提高至89.53%,预警后24小时内处置率由20.51%提高至72.99%。所有这些差异均具有统计学意义(<0.05)。采取综合管理措施后,发现并报告了更多漏报病例,漏报率从5.36%上升至12.33%(<0.05)。报告数量增加的同时,报告准确率从67.54%降至54.05%(<0.05)。
信息系统可通过实时监测和自动预警提高医院感染监测效率,提高报告质量,从而有助于降低医院感染发病率。然而,监测质量仍受预警规则设定是否科学、医院感染判定是否准确等人为因素影响。可能存在漏报率被低估、报告卡质量不高的情况。这表明在采用信息化监测的同时,不能忽视质量控制管理。有必要持续加强漏报调查,提高报告卡质量,确保医院感染监测结果的真实性和准确性。