Zhou Ruizhu, He Liuxuan, Hou Shuai, Yang Sha, Yin Haiyan, Yu Shuguang
( 610075) Acupuncture and Tuina School, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu 610075, China.
( 610075) Key Laboratory of Acupuncture for Senile Disease (Chengdu University of TCM), Ministry of Education, Chengdu 610075, China.
Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2025 Jan 20;56(1):137-142. doi: 10.12182/20250160605.
Based on a complete Freund's adjuvant (CFA)-induced chronic inflammatory pain model, we compared and analyzed the differences in anti-inflammatory and analgesic effects of moxibustion intervention initiated at different timepoints, aiming to identify the optimal timing for moxibustion intervention. The goal is to establish standardized intervention protocols for basic research on the anti-inflammatory and analgesic effects of moxibustion.
Male C57BL/6 mice were randomly divided into 3 groups based on the moxibustion initiation timepoints of 4, 7, and 10 d after modeling. Then, the mice in each group were randomly assigned to 3 subgroups, including a control group, a model group, and a moxibustion group, with 8 mice in each subgroup. Chronic inflammatory pain was induced by injecting 20 μL of CFA into the sole of the right hind paw. Moxibustion applied at the "Zusanli" acupoint for 30 minutes started on the 4th, 7th, and 10th days after modeling, and the intervention continued for 7 days. The latency of paw withdrawal to thermal radiation was measured to evaluate the pain threshold before modeling, after modeling, and on the 1st, 4th, and 7th days of treatment. Foot volume was measured to assess toe swelling before modeling, after modeling, and on the 1st and 7th days of treatment.
Compared with the control group, the model group exhibited a reduced pain threshold ( < 0.0001) and increased paw volume ( < 0.0001). Compared with the model group, the subgroups receiving moxibustion intervention initiated on the 4th, 7th, and 10th days post-modeling exhibited an increased pain threshold ( < 0.05, < 0.0001). However, the paw volume of the subgroups receiving moxibustion intervention initiated on the 4th day post-modeling increased ( < 0.0001), while those of the subgroups receiving moxibustion intervention initiated on the 7th and 10th days post-modeling decreased ( < 0.0001). Among the intervention subgroups receiving moxibustion initiated on days 4, 7, and 10, the day 7 intervention-initiating subgroup showed significant increase in pain threshold ( < 0.05, < 0.0001), and the day 7 and day 10 intervention-initiating subgroups showed significantly reduced paw volume ( < 0.0001).
Considering both the analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects of moxibustion, day 7 post-modeling may be the optimal time for moxibustion to achieve effective anti-inflammatory and analgesic outcomes.
基于完全弗氏佐剂(CFA)诱导的慢性炎性疼痛模型,比较并分析在不同时间点开始艾灸干预的抗炎和镇痛效果差异,旨在确定艾灸干预的最佳时机。目标是建立艾灸抗炎和镇痛作用基础研究的标准化干预方案。
雄性C57BL/6小鼠根据建模后4、7和10天的艾灸起始时间点随机分为3组。然后,每组小鼠随机分为3个亚组,包括对照组、模型组和艾灸组,每个亚组8只小鼠。通过将20μL CFA注射到右后爪足底诱导慢性炎性疼痛。在建模后第4、7和10天开始在“足三里”穴位进行30分钟的艾灸,并持续干预7天。测量热辐射缩爪潜伏期以评估建模前、建模后以及治疗第1、4和7天的疼痛阈值。测量足容积以评估建模前、建模后以及治疗第1和7天的足趾肿胀情况。
与对照组相比,模型组的疼痛阈值降低(<0.0001),足容积增加(<0.0001)。与模型组相比,在建模后第4、7和10天开始艾灸干预的亚组疼痛阈值升高(<0.05,<0.0001)。然而,在建模后第4天开始艾灸干预的亚组足容积增加(<0.0001),而在建模后第7和10天开始艾灸干预的亚组足容积降低(<0.0001)。在第4、7和10天开始艾灸的干预亚组中,第7天开始干预的亚组疼痛阈值显著升高(<0.05,<0.0001),第7天和第10天开始干预的亚组足容积显著降低(<0.0001)。
综合考虑艾灸的镇痛和抗炎作用,建模后第7天可能是艾灸实现有效抗炎和镇痛效果的最佳时间。