Richard Blair Robert James, Bashford-Largo Johannah, Dominguez Ahria J, Hatch Melissa, Dobbertin Matthew, Blair Karina S, Bajaj Sahil
Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
JAACAP Open. 2024 Jun 8;3(1):137-146. doi: 10.1016/j.jaacop.2024.04.007. eCollection 2025 Mar.
Methods to determine integrity of integrated neural systems engaged in functional processes have proven elusive. This study sought to determine the extent to which a machine learning retaliation classifier (retaliation vs unfair offer) developed from a sample of typically developing (TD) adolescents could be applied to an independent sample of clinically concerning youth and the classifier-determined functional integrity for retaliation was associated with antisocial behavior and proactive and reactive aggression.
Blood oxygen level-dependent response data were collected from 82 TD and 120 clinically concerning adolescents while they performed a retaliation task. The support vector machine algorithm was applied to the TD sample and tested on the clinically concerning sample (adolescents with externalizing and internalizing diagnoses).
The support vector machine algorithm was able to distinguish the offer from the retaliation phase after training in the TD sample (accuracy = 92.48%, sensitivity = 89.47%, and specificity = 93.18%) that was comparably successful in distinguishing function in the test sample. Increasing retaliation distance from the hyperplane was associated with decreasing conduct problems and proactive aggression.
The current study provides preliminary data of the importance of a retaliation endophenotype whose functional integrity is associated with reported levels of conduct problems and proactive aggression.
DIVERSITY & INCLUSION STATEMENT: We worked to ensure sex and gender balance in the recruitment of human participants. We worked to ensure race, ethnic, and/or other types of diversity in the recruitment of human participants. We worked to ensure that the study questionnaires were prepared in an inclusive way. We worked to ensure sex balance in the selection of non-human subjects. We worked to ensure diversity in experimental samples through the selection of the cell lines. We worked to ensure diversity in experimental samples through the selection of the genomic datasets. Diverse cell lines and/or genomic datasets were not available. One or more of the authors of this paper self-identifies as a member of one or more historically underrepresented racial and/or ethnic groups in science. We actively worked to promote sex and gender balance in our author group. We actively worked to promote inclusion of historically underrepresented racial and/or ethnic groups in science in our author group. While citing references scientifically relevant for this work, we also actively worked to promote sex and gender balance in our reference list. While citing references scientifically relevant for this work, we also actively worked to promote inclusion of historically underrepresented racial and/or ethnic groups in science in our reference list. The author list of this paper includes contributors from the location and/or community where the research was conducted who participated in the data collection, design, analysis, and/or interpretation of the work.
已证实,确定参与功能过程的整合神经系统完整性的方法难以捉摸。本研究旨在确定从典型发育(TD)青少年样本中开发的机器学习报复分类器(报复与不公平提议)可应用于临床相关青年独立样本的程度,以及分类器确定的报复功能完整性与反社会行为、主动攻击和反应性攻击之间的关联。
在82名TD青少年和120名临床相关青少年执行报复任务时,收集他们的血氧水平依赖反应数据。将支持向量机算法应用于TD样本,并在临床相关样本(有外化和内化诊断的青少年)上进行测试。
支持向量机算法在TD样本中训练后能够区分提议阶段和报复阶段(准确率 = 92.48%,敏感性 = 89.47%,特异性 = 93.18%),在测试样本中区分功能也同样成功。与超平面的报复距离增加与行为问题和主动攻击的减少相关。
本研究提供了报复内表型重要性的初步数据,其功能完整性与报告的行为问题水平和主动攻击相关。
我们努力确保在招募人类参与者时实现性别平衡。我们努力确保在招募人类参与者时实现种族、民族和/或其他类型的多样性。我们努力确保研究问卷以包容的方式编写。我们努力确保在选择非人类受试者时实现性别平衡。我们努力通过选择细胞系来确保实验样本的多样性。我们努力通过选择基因组数据集来确保实验样本的多样性。没有可用的多样细胞系和/或基因组数据集。本文的一位或多位作者自我认定为科学领域中一个或多个历史上代表性不足的种族和/或民族群体的成员。我们积极努力促进作者群体中的性别平衡。我们积极努力促进作者群体中纳入科学领域历史上代表性不足的种族和/或民族群体。在引用与这项工作科学相关的参考文献时,我们也积极努力促进参考文献列表中的性别平衡。在引用与这项工作科学相关的参考文献时,我们也积极努力促进参考文献列表中纳入科学领域历史上代表性不足的种族和/或民族群体。本文的作者名单包括来自研究开展地点和/或社区的贡献者,他们参与了数据收集、设计、分析和/或工作解释。