Dugré Jules R, Potvin Stéphane
Centre de recherche de l'Institut Universitaire en Santé Mentale de Montréal, Montréal, Canada; Department of Psychiatry and Addiction, Faculty of Medicine, University of Montreal, Montréal, Canada.
J Affect Disord. 2023 Jun 15;331:64-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2023.03.005. Epub 2023 Mar 15.
Early evidence suggests that unexpected non-reward may increase the risk for aggressive behaviors. Despite the growing interest in understanding brain functions that may be implicated in aggressive behaviors, the neural processes underlying such frustrative events remain largely unknown. Furthermore, meta-analytic results have produced discrepant results, potentially due to substantial differences in the definition of anger/aggression constructs.
Therefore, we conducted a coordinate-based meta-analysis, using the activation likelihood estimation algorithm, on neuroimaging studies examining reward omission and retaliatory behaviors in healthy subjects. Conjunction analyses were further examined to discover overlapping brain activations across these meta-analytic maps.
Frustrative non-reward deactivated the orbitofrontal cortex, ventral striatum and posterior cingulate cortex, whereas increased activations were observed in midcingulo-insular regions. Retaliatory behaviors recruited the left fronto-insular and anterior midcingulate cortices, the dorsal caudate and the primary somatosensory cortex. Conjunction analyses revealed that both strongly activated midcingulo-insular regions.
Spatial overlap between neural correlates of frustration and retaliatory behaviors was conducted using a conjunction analysis. Therefore, neurobiological markers underlying the temporal sequence of the frustration-aggression theory should be interpreted with caution.
Nonetheless, our results underscore the role of anterior midcingulate/pre-supplementary motor area and fronto-insular cortex in both frustration and retaliatory behaviors. A neurobiological framework for understanding frustration-based impulsive aggression is provided.
早期证据表明,意外的无奖励可能会增加攻击行为的风险。尽管人们对理解可能与攻击行为有关的大脑功能的兴趣日益浓厚,但此类挫折事件背后的神经过程仍 largely 未知。此外,荟萃分析结果产生了不一致的结果,这可能是由于愤怒/攻击结构定义上的实质性差异。
因此,我们使用激活可能性估计算法,对健康受试者中检查奖励缺失和报复行为的神经影像学研究进行了基于坐标的荟萃分析。进一步进行联合分析以发现这些荟萃分析图谱中重叠的脑激活。
挫折性无奖励使眶额皮质、腹侧纹状体和后扣带回皮质失活,而在中扣带 - 脑岛区域观察到激活增加。报复行为激活了左额岛叶和前中扣带回皮质、背侧尾状核和初级体感皮质。联合分析显示,两者均强烈激活了中扣带 - 脑岛区域。
使用联合分析对挫折和报复行为的神经相关性之间的空间重叠进行了研究。因此,对挫折 - 攻击理论时间序列背后的神经生物学标志物的解释应谨慎。
尽管如此,我们的结果强调了前中扣带回/前辅助运动区和额岛叶皮质在挫折和报复行为中的作用。提供了一个理解基于挫折的冲动性攻击的神经生物学框架。