Onay Meryem, Kaya Osman, Telli Elçin, Bilir Ayten, Güleç Mehmet Sacit
Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Faculty of Medicine, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Eskisehir, Turkey.
Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Nizip State Hospital, Gaziantep, Turkey.
Pain Res Manag. 2025 Mar 12;2025:9187270. doi: 10.1155/prm/9187270. eCollection 2025.
This study was designed to compare the effectiveness of the transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block with the addition of morphine to bupivacaine and the TAP block with bupivacaine plus intramuscular (IM) morphine. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of morphine administered with the TAP block on postoperative opioid consumption and pain scores and, secondarily, to determine whether the effect was systemic or local. This prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial included 52 patients. In the IM group, morphine at a dose of 0.1 mg/kg based on ideal body weight (IBW) was administered IM. In addition, a bilateral TAP block was performed under ultrasound guidance using a total of 40 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine, with 20 mL injected on each side. In the TAP group, an ultrasound-guided TAP block, including a total of 40 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine and 0.1 mg/kg morphine according to the IBW of patients, was administered bilaterally. Total morphine consumption 24 h was 19.08 + 11.35 in the IM group and 11.81 + 7.02 in the TAP group, with an estimated difference in means of 7.2 (95% CI: 2.0, 12.5; =0.008). The morphine consumption after 6, 12, and 24 h was lower in the TAP group than in the IM group (=0.033, =0.003, and =0.008, respectively). The VAS scores at rest and during movement did not differ between the two groups. The total 24-h ondansetron consumption was higher in the IM group (=0.046). The postoperative heart rates, blood pressure, and peripheral oxygen saturation at 0, 1, 6, 12, and 24 h did not differ significantly between the groups. The addition of morphine to the TAP block may be an effective method for postoperative analgesia in gynecologic surgery and may not increase systemic side effects, due to the possible local effects of morphine administered interfacial. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05420337.
本研究旨在比较布比卡因中添加吗啡的腹横肌平面(TAP)阻滞与布比卡因加肌肉注射(IM)吗啡的TAP阻滞的有效性。该研究的目的是评估TAP阻滞联合使用吗啡对术后阿片类药物消耗量和疼痛评分的影响,其次是确定这种影响是全身性的还是局部性的。这项前瞻性、双盲、随机对照试验纳入了52例患者。在IM组中,根据理想体重(IBW)给予0.1 mg/kg的吗啡进行肌肉注射。此外,在超声引导下进行双侧TAP阻滞,共使用40 mL 0.25%的布比卡因,每侧注射20 mL。在TAP组中,在超声引导下进行双侧TAP阻滞,根据患者的IBW,共使用40 mL 0.25%的布比卡因和0.1 mg/kg的吗啡。IM组24小时吗啡总消耗量为19.08 + 11.35,TAP组为11.81 + 7.02,平均差异估计为7.2(95% CI:2.0,12.5;P = 0.008)。TAP组6、12和24小时后的吗啡消耗量低于IM组(分别为P = 0.033、P = 0.003和P = 0.008)。两组静息和运动时的视觉模拟评分(VAS)无差异。IM组24小时昂丹司琼总消耗量更高(P = 0.046)。两组在0、1、6、12和24小时的术后心率、血压和外周血氧饱和度无显著差异。在TAP阻滞中添加吗啡可能是妇科手术术后镇痛的有效方法,并且由于界面注射吗啡可能产生局部作用,可能不会增加全身副作用。ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT05420337。