Kanno Keijiro, Hagiwara Shigeo, Shiko Yuki, Kawarai Yuya, Nakamura Junichi, Ohtori Seiji
Department of Orthopaedics Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba 260-8670, Japan.
Biostatistics Section, Clinical Research Center, Chiba University Hospital, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba 260-8670, Japan.
Adv Orthop. 2025 Mar 12;2025:8892577. doi: 10.1155/aort/8892577. eCollection 2025.
Adequate implantation is important to avoid complications following total hip arthroplasty (THA). This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy and precision of implant placement in the direct anterior approach (DAA) using fluoroscopy in comparison with the anterolateral approach in lateral decubitus position (OCM) using a single implant. We retrospectively compared propensity score-matched THAs in DAA with fluoroscopy and in OCM. The achievement ratio of the Lewinnek cup safe zone, absolute difference in alignment, and positioning from preoperative planning was evaluated and compared between each approach. 33 patients in both groups were eligible for this study. Significantly more cups were inside the safe zone in the DAA group than in the OCM group (33/33 vs. 25/33, =0.0048). No significant differences were found between the DAA group and OCM group regarding the discrepancy from the target cup inclination, anteversion, and three-dimensional positioning. No significant difference was noted in stem alignment; however, the equality of coronal alignment variances was smaller in the DAA group (=0.0047). No significant differences were found in the clinical score and complication rate. The DAA using fluoroscopy may provide more accuracy for cup placement and precision for stem placement than OCM.
充分植入对于避免全髋关节置换术(THA)后的并发症很重要。本研究旨在评估在透视引导下直接前路(DAA)植入假体的准确性和精确性,并与采用单个假体的侧卧位前外侧入路(OCM)进行比较。我们回顾性比较了DAA透视引导下和OCM的倾向评分匹配的THA。评估并比较了每种入路的Lewinnek髋臼安全区的达成率、对线的绝对差异以及与术前规划的定位情况。两组各有33例患者符合本研究条件。DAA组髋臼假体位于安全区内的数量显著多于OCM组(33/33对25/33,P = 0.0048)。DAA组和OCM组在与目标髋臼倾斜度、前倾角和三维定位的差异方面未发现显著差异。在股骨柄对线方面未发现显著差异;然而,DAA组冠状面对线方差的一致性较小(P = 0.0047)。临床评分和并发症发生率方面未发现显著差异。透视引导下的DAA在髋臼假体植入方面可能比OCM提供更高的准确性,在股骨柄植入方面提供更高的精确性。