Suppr超能文献

改良Mallampati试验在发声与不发声情况下对成年外科手术患者困难喉镜检查和插管预测的比较:横断面研究

Comparison of modified Mallampati test with and without phonation for prediction of difficult laryngoscopy and intubation among adult surgical patients: cross-sectional study.

作者信息

Yirga Samson, Samuel Hirbo, Markos Zekarias, Yohannes Wontagab

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia, Wachamo University College of Medicine and Other Health Sciences, Hossana, Ethiopia.

Department of Anesthesia, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

出版信息

Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2025 Jan 9;87(1):85-92. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000002836. eCollection 2025 Jan.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The modified Mallampati test (MMT) is one of the most widely used airway assessment tests, for predicting laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation difficulty. The MMT without phonation is routinely performed, but its specificity in identifying easy intubation is controversial. This study aimed to compare the MMT with and without phonation in predicting difficult laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation in adult elective surgical patients who underwent general anesthesia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An institution-based cross-sectional study was performed on 258 adult elective surgical patients who required tracheal intubation. A systemic random sampling technique was employed to select study participants, and the MMT, with and without phonation, was performed during the preoperative assessment. A laryngoscopic view was recorded at the time of tracheal intubation and classified as easy or difficult for tracheal intubation. The collected data were entered into Epi-info and analyzed using the statistics package of social science software version 26. Statistical significance was defined as a value of less than 0.05. This study used specificity, sensitivity, accuracy, and positive and negative predictive values as the statistical measures.

RESULTS

The prevalence of laryngoscopy and intubation difficulties was observed to be 13.6% and 10.5%, respectively. MMT conducted without phonation had the higher sensitivity for predicting difficult laryngoscopy and intubation, than MMT with phonation. But MMT performed with phonation had higher specificity for identifying easy intubation, than MMT without phonation.

CONCLUSION

The MMT with phonation has higher accuracy, specificity, and positive predictive value for difficult laryngoscopy and intubation than the non-phonation approach. MMT combined with phonation can be used as an alternative assessment tool to predict difficult airways.

摘要

背景

改良马兰帕蒂试验(MMT)是最广泛使用的气道评估试验之一,用于预测喉镜检查和气管插管的难度。常规进行无发声的MMT,但它在识别易插管方面的特异性存在争议。本研究旨在比较有发声和无发声的MMT在预测接受全身麻醉的成年择期手术患者喉镜检查困难和气管插管困难方面的效果。

材料与方法

对258例需要气管插管的成年择期手术患者进行了一项基于机构的横断面研究。采用系统随机抽样技术选择研究参与者,并在术前评估期间进行有发声和无发声的MMT。在气管插管时记录喉镜视野,并将其分类为气管插管容易或困难。将收集的数据输入Epi-info,并使用社会科学统计软件包第26版进行分析。统计学显著性定义为P值小于0.05。本研究使用特异性、敏感性、准确性以及阳性和阴性预测值作为统计指标。

结果

观察到喉镜检查困难和插管困难的发生率分别为13.6%和10.5%。与有发声的MMT相比,无发声的MMT在预测喉镜检查困难和插管困难方面具有更高的敏感性。但有发声的MMT在识别易插管方面比无发声的MMT具有更高的特异性。

结论

与无发声方法相比,有发声的MMT在预测喉镜检查困难和插管困难方面具有更高的准确性、特异性和阳性预测值。结合发声的MMT可作为预测困难气道的替代评估工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c483/11918731/4da186f75d52/ms9-87-085-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验