Di Santo Pietro, Abdel-Razek Omar, Prosperi-Porta Graeme, Motazedian Pouya, Thériault-Lauzier Pascal, Alhassani Saad, Sterling Lee H, Parlow Simon, Mathieu Marie-Eve, Jung Richard G, Morgan Baylie, Coyle Doug, Fergusson Dean A, Kyeremanteng Kwadwo, Mathew Rebecca, Labinaz Marino, Froeschl Michael, Hibbert Rebecca, Simard Trevor, Bird Jared G, Wells George A, Hibbert Benjamin
CAPITAL Research Group, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2025 Feb 18;4(2):102516. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2024.102516. eCollection 2025 Feb.
Recent technological advancements have expanded access to ultrasound technology. Invasive cardiac procedures come with risks of vascular access complications, necessitating efficient detection methods for dangerous complications such as pseudoaneurysms. Current clinical practice has relied on physical examination, and often requires formal diagnostic imaging to diagnose these complications. The ULTRAsound Assessment of Access SITe COMplications study assessed the diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) as an adjunct to physical examination for the detection of pseudoaneurysms following invasive cardiac procedures.
We conducted a single-center study that enrolled patients who underwent invasive cardiovascular procedures with suspected access site complications. Cardiology fellows were trained on the use of POCUS by a radiologist with expertise in vascular imaging. The primary outcome focused on the diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of combined clinical and POCUS assessments compared to Doppler ultrasound or computed tomography.
Among 111 participants, most were female (59.5%), with a mean age of 72.2 years, and with transfemoral access being most prevalent (67.6%). A total of 15 participants were found to have a pseudoaneurysm on formal diagnostic imaging. The combined clinical and POCUS assessments were highly sensitive and demonstrated superior DOR for detecting pseudoaneurysms compared to the physical examination alone (DOR 42.6 [95% CI, 34.6-50.6] vs 15.6 [95% CI, 11.7-19.5]; < .01).
Point-of-care ultrasound is a highly sensitive tool for detecting pseudoaneurysms following invasive cardiovascular procedures. These findings suggest the potential integration of POCUS into routine practice, which could result in timely complication identification and management, thereby improving patient outcomes and reducing health care costs.
近期技术进步扩大了超声技术的应用范围。侵入性心脏手术存在血管通路并发症的风险,因此需要有效的检测方法来发现诸如假性动脉瘤等危险并发症。目前的临床实践依赖体格检查,且常常需要进行正式的诊断性成像来诊断这些并发症。“侵入性心脏手术血管通路部位并发症的超声评估”研究评估了床旁超声(POCUS)作为体格检查辅助手段用于检测侵入性心脏手术后假性动脉瘤的诊断准确性。
我们开展了一项单中心研究,纳入了接受侵入性心血管手术且怀疑有血管通路部位并发症的患者。心脏病学进修医师由一位血管成像领域的放射科医生进行床旁超声使用培训。主要结局指标聚焦于联合临床评估和床旁超声评估相对于多普勒超声或计算机断层扫描的诊断比值比(DOR)。
在111名参与者中,大多数为女性(59.5%),平均年龄72.2岁,经股动脉通路最为常见(67.6%)。在正式诊断性成像中,共发现15名参与者患有假性动脉瘤。联合临床评估和床旁超声评估具有高度敏感性,与单纯体格检查相比,在检测假性动脉瘤方面显示出更高的诊断比值比(诊断比值比42.6 [95%置信区间,34.6 - 50.6] 对比15.6 [95%置信区间,11.7 - 19.5];P <.01)。
床旁超声是检测侵入性心血管手术后假性动脉瘤的高度敏感工具。这些发现提示床旁超声有可能整合到常规实践中,这可能会及时识别和处理并发症,从而改善患者预后并降低医疗成本。