Memon Ayaz Ahmed, Godbole Chintamani, Tzivanakis Alexios, Mohamed Faheez, Dayal Sanjeev, Moran B J, Cecil Tom
Peritoneal Malignancy Institute, Basingstoke and North Hampshire Hospital NHS Trust, Basingstoke, GBR.
Cureus. 2025 Feb 17;17(2):e79140. doi: 10.7759/cureus.79140. eCollection 2025 Feb.
Introduction Multidisciplinary team (MDT) meetings are now considered part of the standard of care for decision-making and management of patients with cancer. However, most MDTs now face capacity issues and supplementary approaches should be considered. We report our experience with a novel clinical radiological assessment meeting (CRAM) as a 'mini-MDT' to expedite decision-making and enhance the function of the parallel specialist MDT. Methods A retrospective analysis of new referrals to a high-volume peritoneal malignancy unit between September 2016 and August 2018 was performed. Time to first response and decision following referral were assessed for the traditional referral pathway and after the introduction of the CRAM in September 2017. Response times were calculated from the receipt of the referral to the date of the first response and were classified into one of four categories: 'specialist peritoneal malignancy MDT review,' 'outpatient review,' 'recommendation for local follow-up', or 'further information required'. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the response times between the two pathways. Results In total, 1478 new referrals were received in the two-year period, 769 pre-CRAM and 709 after CRAM introduction. The median referral to first response time was eight days using traditional pathways and five days after the introduction of the CRAM (p <0.001). In the traditional pathway, 234/769 (30.4%) patients were discussed further in the specialist MDT, compared with 122/709 (17.2%) after the CRAM assessment. Conclusion A novel CRAM significantly reduced first response times to the referring team facilitating rapid and safe assessment with quicker decisions for the patients. It enabled more appropriate use of an ever-expanding MDT.
引言 多学科团队(MDT)会议如今被视为癌症患者决策和管理护理标准的一部分。然而,大多数多学科团队目前面临能力问题,应考虑采用补充方法。我们报告了我们将新型临床放射学评估会议(CRAM)作为“小型MDT”的经验,以加快决策并增强并行的专科MDT的功能。
方法 对2016年9月至2018年8月期间大量腹膜恶性肿瘤科室新转诊患者进行回顾性分析。评估传统转诊途径以及2017年9月引入CRAM后的首次回应和决策时间。回应时间从收到转诊至首次回应日期计算,并分为四类之一:“专科腹膜恶性肿瘤MDT审查”、“门诊审查”、“建议进行局部随访”或“需要更多信息”。使用Mann-Whitney U检验比较两种途径之间的回应时间。
结果 在两年期间共收到1478例新转诊患者,CRAM引入前769例,引入后709例。使用传统途径时,转诊至首次回应的中位时间为8天,引入CRAM后为5天(p<0.001)。在传统途径中,234/769(30.4%)的患者在专科MDT中进行了进一步讨论,而在CRAM评估后为122/709(17.2%)。
结论 一种新型CRAM显著缩短了对转诊团队的首次回应时间,便于对患者进行快速安全的评估并更快做出决策。它能够更合理地利用不断扩大的MDT。