• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改革癌症多学科团队会议:引入新型临床放射学评估会议(CRAM)以缩短响应时间并减轻工作量。

Reforming Cancer Multidisciplinary Team Meetings: Introducing a Novel Clinical Radiological Assessment Meeting (CRAM) to Reduce Response Times and Workloads.

作者信息

Memon Ayaz Ahmed, Godbole Chintamani, Tzivanakis Alexios, Mohamed Faheez, Dayal Sanjeev, Moran B J, Cecil Tom

机构信息

Peritoneal Malignancy Institute, Basingstoke and North Hampshire Hospital NHS Trust, Basingstoke, GBR.

出版信息

Cureus. 2025 Feb 17;17(2):e79140. doi: 10.7759/cureus.79140. eCollection 2025 Feb.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.79140
PMID:40109803
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11921051/
Abstract

Introduction Multidisciplinary team (MDT) meetings are now considered part of the standard of care for decision-making and management of patients with cancer. However, most MDTs now face capacity issues and supplementary approaches should be considered. We report our experience with a novel clinical radiological assessment meeting (CRAM) as a 'mini-MDT' to expedite decision-making and enhance the function of the parallel specialist MDT.  Methods A retrospective analysis of new referrals to a high-volume peritoneal malignancy unit between September 2016 and August 2018 was performed. Time to first response and decision following referral were assessed for the traditional referral pathway and after the introduction of the CRAM in September 2017. Response times were calculated from the receipt of the referral to the date of the first response and were classified into one of four categories: 'specialist peritoneal malignancy MDT review,' 'outpatient review,' 'recommendation for local follow-up', or 'further information required'. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the response times between the two pathways. Results In total, 1478 new referrals were received in the two-year period, 769 pre-CRAM and 709 after CRAM introduction. The median referral to first response time was eight days using traditional pathways and five days after the introduction of the CRAM (p <0.001). In the traditional pathway, 234/769 (30.4%) patients were discussed further in the specialist MDT, compared with 122/709 (17.2%) after the CRAM assessment.  Conclusion A novel CRAM significantly reduced first response times to the referring team facilitating rapid and safe assessment with quicker decisions for the patients. It enabled more appropriate use of an ever-expanding MDT.

摘要

引言 多学科团队(MDT)会议如今被视为癌症患者决策和管理护理标准的一部分。然而,大多数多学科团队目前面临能力问题,应考虑采用补充方法。我们报告了我们将新型临床放射学评估会议(CRAM)作为“小型MDT”的经验,以加快决策并增强并行的专科MDT的功能。

方法 对2016年9月至2018年8月期间大量腹膜恶性肿瘤科室新转诊患者进行回顾性分析。评估传统转诊途径以及2017年9月引入CRAM后的首次回应和决策时间。回应时间从收到转诊至首次回应日期计算,并分为四类之一:“专科腹膜恶性肿瘤MDT审查”、“门诊审查”、“建议进行局部随访”或“需要更多信息”。使用Mann-Whitney U检验比较两种途径之间的回应时间。

结果 在两年期间共收到1478例新转诊患者,CRAM引入前769例,引入后709例。使用传统途径时,转诊至首次回应的中位时间为8天,引入CRAM后为5天(p<0.001)。在传统途径中,234/769(30.4%)的患者在专科MDT中进行了进一步讨论,而在CRAM评估后为122/709(17.2%)。

结论 一种新型CRAM显著缩短了对转诊团队的首次回应时间,便于对患者进行快速安全的评估并更快做出决策。它能够更合理地利用不断扩大的MDT。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0798/11921051/1340d1ca1c9c/cureus-0017-00000079140-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0798/11921051/990f3e9b076c/cureus-0017-00000079140-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0798/11921051/1340d1ca1c9c/cureus-0017-00000079140-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0798/11921051/990f3e9b076c/cureus-0017-00000079140-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0798/11921051/1340d1ca1c9c/cureus-0017-00000079140-i02.jpg

相似文献

1
Reforming Cancer Multidisciplinary Team Meetings: Introducing a Novel Clinical Radiological Assessment Meeting (CRAM) to Reduce Response Times and Workloads.改革癌症多学科团队会议:引入新型临床放射学评估会议(CRAM)以缩短响应时间并减轻工作量。
Cureus. 2025 Feb 17;17(2):e79140. doi: 10.7759/cureus.79140. eCollection 2025 Feb.
2
Degrees of Multidisciplinarity Underpinning Care Planning for Patients with Cancer in Weekly Multidisciplinary Team Meetings: Conversation Analysis.每周多学科团队会议中癌症患者护理计划的多学科程度:会话分析
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2021 Feb 18;14:411-424. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S270394. eCollection 2021.
3
Referral patterns and outcomes of a highly specialised pelvic exenteration multidisciplinary team meeting: A retrospective cohort study.高度专业化的盆腔廓清术多学科团队会议的转诊模式和结果:一项回顾性队列研究。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020 Jun;46(6):1138-1143. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.02.031. Epub 2020 Feb 21.
4
Do Surgical Oncology Multidisciplinary Team Meetings Make a Difference?外科肿瘤多学科团队会议有作用吗?
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Feb;32(2):1222-1231. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-16471-7. Epub 2024 Nov 16.
5
Is there a Benefit of Multidisciplinary Cancer Team Meetings for Patients with Gastrointestinal Malignancies?多学科癌症团队会议对胃肠道恶性肿瘤患者有益吗?
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Aug;23(8):2430-7. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5178-3. Epub 2016 Mar 22.
6
Impact of optional multidisciplinary tumor board meeting on the mortality of patients with gastrointestinal cancer: A retrospective observational study.选择性多学科肿瘤委员会会议对胃肠道癌患者死亡率的影响:一项回顾性观察研究。
Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2021 Aug;4(4):e1373. doi: 10.1002/cnr2.1373. Epub 2021 Mar 19.
7
The impact of multidisciplinary team meetings on patient assessment, management and outcomes in oncology settings: A systematic review of the literature.多学科团队会议对肿瘤学环境中患者评估、管理和结局的影响:文献系统评价。
Cancer Treat Rev. 2016 Jan;42:56-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2015.11.007. Epub 2015 Nov 24.
8
Impact of a Multidisciplinary Team Approach for Managing Advanced and Recurrent Colorectal Cancer.多学科团队方法对晚期和复发性结直肠癌管理的影响
World J Surg. 2018 Jul;42(7):2227-2233. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-4409-5.
9
Development and evaluation of a checklist to support decision making in cancer multidisciplinary team meetings: MDT-QuIC.制定并评估一份检查表以支持癌症多学科团队会议中的决策:MDT-QuIC。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Jun;19(6):1759-65. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-2187-0. Epub 2011 Dec 30.
10
"No decision about me without me" in the context of cancer multidisciplinary team meetings: a qualitative interview study.癌症多学科团队会议背景下的“没有我参与就没有关于我的决定”:一项定性访谈研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Oct 24;14:488. doi: 10.1186/s12913-014-0488-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient experiences of the urgent cancer referral pathway-Can the NHS do better? Semi-structured interviews with patients with upper gastrointestinal cancer.患者对上消化道癌症的紧急癌症转诊途径的体验-国民保健制度(NHS)能否做得更好?对上消化道癌症患者的半结构化访谈。
Health Expect. 2020 Dec;23(6):1512-1522. doi: 10.1111/hex.13136. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
2
Peritoneal mesothelioma: PSOGI/EURACAN clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.腹膜间皮瘤:PSOGI/EURACAN诊断、治疗及随访临床实践指南
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021 Jan;47(1):36-59. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.02.011. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
3
Appendiceal tumours and pseudomyxoma peritonei: Literature review with PSOGI/EURACAN clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis and treatment.
阑尾肿瘤和腹膜假黏液瘤:文献综述及 PSOGI/EURACAN 诊断和治疗临床实践指南。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021 Jan;47(1):11-35. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.02.012. Epub 2020 Feb 28.
4
Improving the effectiveness of cancer multidisciplinary team meetings: analysis of a national survey of MDT members' opinions about streamlining patient discussions.提高癌症多学科团队会议的有效性:对多学科团队成员关于简化患者讨论意见的全国性调查分析
BMJ Open Qual. 2019 Jun 4;8(2):e000631. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000631. eCollection 2019.
5
Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain & Ireland (ACPGBI): Guidelines for the Management of Cancer of the Colon, Rectum and Anus (2017) - Surgical Management.大不列颠及爱尔兰结直肠外科学会(ACPGBI):《结肠、直肠和肛管癌管理指南(2017年)——手术管理》
Colorectal Dis. 2017 Jul;19 Suppl 1:18-36. doi: 10.1111/codi.13704.
6
Evaluation of the benefit and use of multidisciplinary teams in the treatment of head and neck cancer.多学科团队在头颈癌治疗中的益处及应用评估。
Oral Oncol. 2016 Aug;59:73-79. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2016.06.002.
7
Is there a Benefit of Multidisciplinary Cancer Team Meetings for Patients with Gastrointestinal Malignancies?多学科癌症团队会议对胃肠道恶性肿瘤患者有益吗?
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Aug;23(8):2430-7. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5178-3. Epub 2016 Mar 22.
8
The impact of multidisciplinary team meetings on patient assessment, management and outcomes in oncology settings: A systematic review of the literature.多学科团队会议对肿瘤学环境中患者评估、管理和结局的影响:文献系统评价。
Cancer Treat Rev. 2016 Jan;42:56-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2015.11.007. Epub 2015 Nov 24.
9
The results of cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in 1200 patients with peritoneal malignancy.1200例腹膜恶性肿瘤患者的减瘤手术及腹腔热灌注化疗结果
Colorectal Dis. 2015 Sep;17(9):772-8. doi: 10.1111/codi.12975.
10
"No decision about me without me" in the context of cancer multidisciplinary team meetings: a qualitative interview study.癌症多学科团队会议背景下的“没有我参与就没有关于我的决定”:一项定性访谈研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Oct 24;14:488. doi: 10.1186/s12913-014-0488-2.