Almonla Yaser M, Akkour Khalid, Khazna Miyad, Abduljawad Salim M
College of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, SAU.
General Practice, Kingdom Hospital, Riyadh, SAU.
Cureus. 2025 Feb 17;17(2):e79151. doi: 10.7759/cureus.79151. eCollection 2025 Feb.
Objective This study aims to compare the outcomes of total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) and total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) in patients with and without prior abdominal surgery, focusing on key factors such as blood loss, operative time, complication rates, and hospital stay. The primary aim is to assess the impact of previous abdominal surgery on surgical outcomes. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a private hospital in Saudi Arabia between January 2019 and July 2024. The study included patients who underwent TLH or TAH, with or without prior abdominal surgery, such as cesarean sections (CSs), appendectomies, cholecystectomies, and hernia repairs. A total of 163 procedures were performed by a single surgeon. Patients aged 18-70 years were included, while cases in which a hysterectomy was immediately followed by an elective CS were excluded to prevent bias in operative time and blood loss measurements. Surgical outcomes were then compared between groups. Results A total of 151 patients were included, with 56 undergoing TLH and 95 undergoing TAH. Prior abdominal surgery was present in 24 (42.9%) TLH patients and 33 (34.7%) TAH patients. Median blood loss was significantly lower in the TLH group (200 mL, IQR: 100-300) compared to the TAH group (300 mL, IQR: 200-500) (p = 0.00). The median hospital stay was also shorter for TLH patients (two days, IQR: 1-3) than for TAH patients (two to three days, IQR: 2-3) (p = 0.00). There was no significant difference in operative time between TLH (98.5 minutes, IQR: 83.25-116.5) and TAH (95 minutes, IQR: 76-120) (p = 0.633). Complications occurred in four (7.1%) TLH patients and seven (7.4%) TAH patients, with bladder injuries reported in two patients from each group and bowel injuries in three TAH patients. The majority of patients in both groups experienced no complications (92.9% in TLH and 92.6% in TAH). Conclusions TLH provides significant advantages over TAH, including reduced blood loss and shorter hospital stays, even in patients with prior abdominal surgeries. It remains a safe and effective option when performed by experienced surgeons. However, the choice between TLH and TAH should be individualized, taking into account factors such as the extent of adhesions, surgical expertise, and patient health. Further research is recommended to optimize outcomes in complex cases.
目的 本研究旨在比较全腹腔镜子宫切除术(TLH)和经腹全子宫切除术(TAH)在有或无既往腹部手术史患者中的手术结果,重点关注失血、手术时间、并发症发生率和住院时间等关键因素。主要目的是评估既往腹部手术对手术结果的影响。方法 2019年1月至2024年7月在沙特阿拉伯一家私立医院进行了一项回顾性队列研究。该研究纳入了接受TLH或TAH的患者,无论其有无既往腹部手术史,如剖宫产(CS)、阑尾切除术、胆囊切除术和疝气修补术。由一名外科医生共进行了163例手术。纳入年龄在18 - 70岁的患者,排除子宫切除术后立即进行择期CS的病例,以防止手术时间和失血量测量出现偏差。然后比较两组之间的手术结果。结果 共纳入151例患者,其中56例行TLH,95例行TAH。24例(42.9%)TLH患者和33例(34.7%)TAH患者有既往腹部手术史。TLH组的中位失血量(200 mL,四分位间距:100 - 300)显著低于TAH组(300 mL,四分位间距:200 - 500)(p = 0.00)。TLH患者的中位住院时间(2天,四分位间距:1 - 3)也比TAH患者(2至3天,四分位间距:2 - 3)短(p = 0.00)。TLH(98.5分钟,四分位间距:83.25 - 116.5)和TAH(95分钟,四分位间距:76 - 120)之间的手术时间无显著差异(p = 0.633)。4例(7.1%)TLH患者和7例(7.4%)TAH患者发生并发症,每组各有2例患者报告膀胱损伤,3例TAH患者报告肠道损伤。两组中的大多数患者未发生并发症(TLH组为92.9%,TAH组为92.6%)。结论 即使在有既往腹部手术史的患者中,TLH也比TAH具有显著优势,包括减少失血和缩短住院时间。由经验丰富的外科医生进行时,它仍然是一种安全有效的选择。然而,TLH和TAH之间的选择应个体化,考虑粘连程度、手术专业技能和患者健康等因素。建议进一步研究以优化复杂病例的手术结果。