Broadbridge Elizabeth, Roter Debra L, Persky Susan, Erby Lori H
Department of Communication, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
Medical Genomics and Metabolic Genetics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
J Genet Couns. 2025 Apr;34(2):e2013. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.2013.
Genetic counselors routinely provide service in many environments, including counseling-type and medical-type rooms; in this study, counseling environments are characterized by office décor that facilitates discussion around a seated table, while medical environments include an exam table and separate seating. Outside of the genetic counseling context, manipulation of the environment can influence client comfort in disclosing personal information, well-being, and overall satisfaction with clinician communication. However, there is little known about how clients experience genetic counseling in one environment versus the other and how that might influence their evaluation of genetic counselor communication. To explore the extent to which the physical environment influences client perceptions, we video recorded two simulated sessions addressing the same genetic counseling topic with two contrasting styles of communication (more and less patient-centered) in front of a greenscreen background. Videos were digitally placed in counseling and medical environments such that the same verbal and nonverbal communication was presented in the two environments, creating a total of four videos (e.g., a 2 × 2 experimental design). Participants (N = 861) were randomly assigned to observe one of the four videos and respond as if they were the client in the video (e.g., as analog clients). Overall, participants rated the less patient-centered communication more favorably (p < 0.05 across variables), contrary to our expectations. Structural equation modeling revealed that perceptions of nonverbal communication mediated the relationship between communication style and perceptions of the counselor's encouragement of participation in the session and the therapeutic bond. Results offer insight into how the physical environment might influence communication in genetic counseling, illustrating new avenues for improving client-counselor communication in this context.
遗传咨询师通常在多种环境中提供服务,包括咨询类房间和医疗类房间;在本研究中,咨询环境的特点是办公室装饰便于围绕坐式桌子进行讨论,而医疗环境则包括检查台和独立的座位。在遗传咨询背景之外,环境的操控会影响客户披露个人信息时的舒适度、幸福感以及对临床医生沟通的总体满意度。然而,对于客户在一种环境与另一种环境中体验遗传咨询的方式以及这可能如何影响他们对遗传咨询师沟通的评价,我们知之甚少。为了探究物理环境在多大程度上影响客户的认知,我们在绿幕背景前录制了两个模拟环节,针对同一个遗传咨询主题采用两种截然不同的沟通风格(以患者为中心程度较高和较低)。视频被数字放置在咨询和医疗环境中,以便在两种环境中呈现相同的言语和非言语沟通,从而创建了总共四个视频(例如,2×2实验设计)。参与者(N = 861)被随机分配观看四个视频中的一个,并以视频中的客户身份做出回应(例如,作为模拟客户)。总体而言,参与者对以患者为中心程度较低的沟通评价更高(各变量的p < 0.05),这与我们的预期相反。结构方程模型显示,对非言语沟通的认知介导了沟通风格与对咨询师鼓励参与环节和治疗关系的认知之间的关系。研究结果为物理环境如何影响遗传咨询中的沟通提供了见解,阐明了在此背景下改善客户与咨询师沟通的新途径。