Lazar Tucker Jane, Arcoleo Kimberly, DiTomasso Diane, Oaks Brietta M, Cabral Howard, São-João Thaís
College of Nursing, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI, USA.
College of Health Sciences, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI, USA.
J Hum Lact. 2025 May;41(2):283-293. doi: 10.1177/08903344251319362. Epub 2025 Mar 20.
Breastfeeding provides numerous benefits for mothers and infants, but there are disparities in breastfeeding rates by race and ethnicity in the United States.
Our study aimed to identify the extent to which Baby Friendly Hospital Initiative (BFHI) key clinical practices during the birth hospitalization influenced breastfeeding success by race and ethnicity.
This study was a secondary analysis of the 2016 to 2019 National Pregnancy Risk Assessment Measurement System (PRAMS), a cross-sectional survey. Our sample included 60,395 mothers who initiated breastfeeding with healthy, term newborns. We examined the odds of breastfeeding to ≥ 10 weeks by percent of key clinical practices received and racial and ethnic group. Absolute racial differences were calculated to reflect the difference in breastfeeding rates by race and ethnicity overall, and stratified by percent of BFHI key clinical practices received.
BFHI key clinical practices were a significant predictor of breastfeeding at ≥ 10 weeks; receipt of progressively more key clinical practices resulted in higher odds of breastfeeding. Over 75% of mothers who received 100% of key clinical practices breastfed for at least 10 weeks across all racial and ethnic groups. Among mothers who received ideal breastfeeding care, disparities were eliminated; there were no statistically significant differences in rates of breastfeeding ≥ 10 weeks for Black non-Hispanic (adjusted absolute racial difference [aARD] -4.5, 95% CI [-9.5, 0.4]), Hispanic English-speaking (aARD -2.6, 95% CI [-6.6, 1.4]), or Hispanic Spanish-speaking (aARD 1.7, 95% CI [-5.2, 8.6]) mothers compared to White non-Hispanic mothers.
There is a need to renew the push for universal adoption of BFHI by U.S. hospitals to address racial and ethnic disparities in breastfeeding outcomes.
母乳喂养对母亲和婴儿有诸多益处,但美国不同种族和族裔的母乳喂养率存在差异。
我们的研究旨在确定分娩住院期间爱婴医院倡议(BFHI)的关键临床实践在多大程度上影响了不同种族和族裔的母乳喂养成功率。
本研究是对2016年至2019年国家妊娠风险评估测量系统(PRAMS)的二次分析,这是一项横断面调查。我们的样本包括60395名开始对健康足月儿进行母乳喂养的母亲。我们根据接受关键临床实践的比例和种族及族裔群体,研究了母乳喂养至≥10周的几率。计算绝对种族差异以反映总体上不同种族和族裔母乳喂养率的差异,并按接受BFHI关键临床实践的比例进行分层。
BFHI关键临床实践是母乳喂养至≥10周的重要预测因素;接受越来越多关键临床实践会使母乳喂养几率更高。在所有种族和族裔群体中,接受100%关键临床实践的母亲中超过75%母乳喂养至少10周。在接受理想母乳喂养护理的母亲中,差异消除;与非西班牙裔白人母亲相比,非西班牙裔黑人(调整后的绝对种族差异[aARD] -4.5,95%置信区间[-9.5, 0.4])、说英语的西班牙裔(aARD -2.6,95%置信区间[-6.6, 1.4])或说西班牙语的西班牙裔(aARD 1.7,95%置信区间[-5.2, 8.6])母亲母乳喂养≥10周的比率无统计学显著差异。
有必要推动美国医院普遍采用BFHI,以解决母乳喂养结果中的种族和族裔差异问题。