Suppr超能文献

耳鸣障碍量表和耳鸣功能指数最小临床重要差异的估计

Estimation of Minimal Clinically Important Difference for Tinnitus Handicap Inventory and Tinnitus Functional Index.

作者信息

Engelke Milena, Basso Laura, Langguth Berthold, Zeman Florian, Schlee Winfried, Schoisswohl Stefan, Cima Rilana, Kikidis Dimitris, Lopez-Escamez Jose Antonio, Brüggemann Petra, Mazurek Birgit, Simões Jorge Piano

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.

Center for Clinical Studies, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.

出版信息

Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2025 Mar 20. doi: 10.1002/ohn.1217.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) represents the smallest change in treatment outcome deemed clinically meaningful. This study estimates the MCID for 2 widely used tinnitus measures: the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) and the Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI), using anchor-based approaches while accounting for baseline severity and time interval.

STUDY DESIGN

A multi-center randomized clinical trial.

SETTING

European tinnitus centers.

METHODS

Anchor-based approaches, including the effect size, receiver-operating characteristics, and ΔTHI/TFI methods, were employed to determine the MCID. The "minimally improved" category of the Clinical Global Impression Scale-Improvement (CGI-I) served as the anchor. The standard error of measurement was used to assess random variation.

RESULTS

For the THI, MCID estimates ranged from 7.8 to 12, with a point estimate of 11 after 12 weeks of treatment (N = 364). For the TFI, MCID estimates ranged from 7.3 to 9.4, with a point estimate of 9 points after 12 weeks (N = 359). Both measures indicated that higher baseline severity and longer time intervals required greater score reduction for clinical relevance.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights the context-specific nature of MCID values for tinnitus measures and emphasizes the need for consensus on optimal anchor-based approaches to improve comparability.

摘要

目的

最小临床重要差异(MCID)代表在临床上被认为有意义的治疗结果的最小变化。本研究使用基于锚定的方法,同时考虑基线严重程度和时间间隔,估计两种广泛使用的耳鸣测量方法的MCID:耳鸣障碍量表(THI)和耳鸣功能指数(TFI)。

研究设计

一项多中心随机临床试验。

研究地点

欧洲耳鸣中心。

方法

采用基于锚定的方法,包括效应量、受试者工作特征曲线和ΔTHI/TFI方法来确定MCID。临床总体印象量表-改善(CGI-I)的“最小改善”类别用作锚定。测量的标准误差用于评估随机变异。

结果

对于THI,MCID估计值范围为7.8至12,治疗12周后的点估计值为11(N = 364)。对于TFI,MCID估计值范围为7.3至9.4,12周后的点估计值为9分(N = 359)。两种测量方法均表明,基线严重程度越高和时间间隔越长,为达到临床相关性所需的分数降低幅度就越大。

结论

本研究强调了耳鸣测量中MCID值的特定背景性质,并强调需要就最佳的基于锚定的方法达成共识,以提高可比性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验