• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“MAPS”伤口愈合指数介绍及其与引导骨再生结果的相关性。

Introduction of "MAPS" wound healing index and its correlation with guided bone regeneration outcome.

作者信息

Rodriguez Amanda, Velasquez Diego, Marquez Leonardo, Ramos Jose Maria, Zambrana Nataly, Masotti Maria, Kripfgans Oliver, Chan Hsun-Liang

机构信息

Department of Periodontics and Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.

Department of Periodontology, University of Illinois Chicago College of Dentistry, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 Mar 20;20(3):e0319271. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319271. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0319271
PMID:40111952
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11925305/
Abstract

METHODS

The MAPS score was introduced to evaluate the bioMechanical, Aesthetic/Anatomical, Pathophysiologic, and Subject-related parameters for the healing assessment of 20 patients who underwent GBR in the posterior mandible retrospectively. Intraoral photography was taken at 3-, 10-, 21 days, and 5 months, resulting in 80 follow-up visits. Two independent examiners evaluated the photos giving scores for each timepoint and tested against horizontal bone gain (CBCT) for predictability.

RESULTS

Cohen's Kappa values showed high intra- and inter-examiner agreement. Pearson's correlation showed an inverse correlation between baseline bone width and bone changes at a 3 mm level (R2 = 0.23). The higher M, A, and P values at any time point were associated with higher bone gain. The 10-day MAPS score turns out the most predictive of bone gain (RMSE 1.32, R2 0.75). In addition, increasing the average P score by 1 point at 10 days is associated with an increase in bone gain of 1.23 (p=.057).

CONCLUSION

The MAPS score improves consistently over the 5-month healing period. However, no statistically significant difference is observed between the scores at 21 days and 5 months, reflecting the clinical healing pattern for GBR. The overall MAPS score correlated with bone changes after GBR procedures, indicating its potential for estimating hard tissue regenerative outcomes.

摘要

方法

引入MAPS评分以评估20例接受下颌骨后部引导骨再生(GBR)患者愈合情况的生物力学、美学/解剖学、病理生理学和与受试者相关的参数。在术后3天、10天、21天和5个月进行口内摄影,共80次随访。两名独立检查者对照片进行评估,为每个时间点打分,并与水平骨增量(CBCT)进行预测性对比。

结果

Cohen's Kappa值显示检查者内和检查者间具有高度一致性。Pearson相关性分析显示,在3mm水平,基线骨宽度与骨变化呈负相关(R2 = 0.23)。在任何时间点,较高的M、A和P值与较高的骨增量相关。结果显示,10天时的MAPS评分对骨增量的预测性最强(均方根误差1.32,R2 0.75)。此外,10天时平均P评分每增加1分,骨增量增加1.23(p = 0.057)。

结论

在5个月的愈合期内,MAPS评分持续改善。然而,21天和5个月时的评分之间未观察到统计学上的显著差异,这反映了GBR的临床愈合模式。整体MAPS评分与GBR术后的骨变化相关,表明其在估计硬组织再生结果方面的潜力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d2b/11925305/c366e8556f57/pone.0319271.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d2b/11925305/982f056ae633/pone.0319271.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d2b/11925305/08cb6e79e056/pone.0319271.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d2b/11925305/55c2735c61f0/pone.0319271.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d2b/11925305/46a82b34ebcd/pone.0319271.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d2b/11925305/37c33a84e8d1/pone.0319271.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d2b/11925305/d89481156f5b/pone.0319271.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d2b/11925305/2b74458907c4/pone.0319271.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d2b/11925305/c366e8556f57/pone.0319271.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d2b/11925305/982f056ae633/pone.0319271.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d2b/11925305/08cb6e79e056/pone.0319271.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d2b/11925305/55c2735c61f0/pone.0319271.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d2b/11925305/46a82b34ebcd/pone.0319271.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d2b/11925305/37c33a84e8d1/pone.0319271.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d2b/11925305/d89481156f5b/pone.0319271.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d2b/11925305/2b74458907c4/pone.0319271.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d2b/11925305/c366e8556f57/pone.0319271.g008.jpg

相似文献

1
Introduction of "MAPS" wound healing index and its correlation with guided bone regeneration outcome.“MAPS”伤口愈合指数介绍及其与引导骨再生结果的相关性。
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 20;20(3):e0319271. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319271. eCollection 2025.
2
A randomized controlled clinical trial comparing small buccal dehiscence defects around dental implants treated with guided bone regeneration or left for spontaneous healing.一项随机对照临床试验,比较采用引导骨再生治疗或任其自然愈合的牙种植体周围小颊侧骨开裂缺损情况。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017 Mar;28(3):348-354. doi: 10.1111/clr.12806. Epub 2016 Feb 29.
3
Effect of ridge morphology on guided bone regeneration outcome: conventional tomographic study.牙槽嵴形态对引导骨再生结果的影响:传统断层扫描研究
J Periodontol. 2009 Aug;80(8):1231-6. doi: 10.1902/jop.2009.090090.
4
Clinical and 3-Dimensional Radiographic Evaluation of Autogenous Iliac Block Bone Grafting and Guided Bone Regeneration in Patients With Atrophic Maxilla.萎缩性上颌骨患者自体髂骨块状骨移植与引导骨再生的临床及三维影像学评估
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017 Apr;75(4):709-722. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2016.11.019. Epub 2016 Nov 26.
5
Accuracy of cone beam computed tomography in assessing peri-implant bone defect regeneration: a histologically controlled study in dogs.锥形束计算机断层扫描评估种植体周围骨缺损再生的准确性:一项在犬中的组织学对照研究。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Jul;23(7):882-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02232.x. Epub 2011 Jun 24.
6
Assessment of hard tissue changes after horizontal guided bone regeneration with the aid of deep learning CBCT segmentation.借助深度学习CBCT分割技术评估水平引导骨再生后的硬组织变化。
Clin Oral Investig. 2025 Jan 13;29(1):59. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-06136-w.
7
Spontaneous regeneration of bone following mandibular ramus bone harvesting: a CBCT analysis.下颌支骨采集后骨的自发再生:CBCT 分析。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2024 Oct;53(10):853-859. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2024.05.006. Epub 2024 Jun 4.
8
Augmentation stability and early wound healing outcomes of guided bone regeneration in peri-implant dehiscence defects with L- and I-shaped soft block bone substitutes: A clinical and radiographic study.引导骨再生技术中 L 型和 I 型软组织块骨替代物在种植体周围骨缺损中增加稳定性和早期愈合效果的临床和影像学研究。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2021 Nov;32(11):1308-1317. doi: 10.1111/clr.13830. Epub 2021 Aug 23.
9
Horizontal Guided Bone Regeneration of the Posterior Mandible to Allow Implant Placement: 1-Year Prospective Study Results.下颌后部水平引导骨再生以实现种植体植入:1年前瞻性研究结果
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2025 Jan;36(1):100-116. doi: 10.1111/clr.14363. Epub 2024 Oct 1.
10
In vivo experimental study comparing alveolar ridge preservation versus guided bone regeneration after unassisted socket healing at intact and damaged sites in narrow alveolar ridges.在狭窄牙槽嵴完整和受损部位进行无辅助拔牙窝愈合后,比较牙槽嵴保存与引导骨再生的体内实验研究。
J Periodontol. 2025 Mar;96(3):279-289. doi: 10.1002/JPER.24-0125. Epub 2024 Jul 15.

本文引用的文献

1
A systematic review of oral wound healing indices.口腔伤口愈合指数的系统评价
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 8;19(2):e0290050. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290050. eCollection 2024.
2
Review of Intraoral Vasculature and Implications on Incision Designs of Periodontal and Implant Surgeries.口腔内脉管系统综述及其对牙周和种植手术切口设计的影响。
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2023 Nov 3;43(6):753-761. doi: 10.11607/prd.6213.
3
CBCT Evaluation of Quality and Quantity of Bones for Immediate Implant Treatment Planning in Central Incisor Area in relation to Arch Form.
锥形束 CT 评估中央切牙区牙弓形态与即刻种植治疗计划相关的骨质量和骨量。
ScientificWorldJournal. 2023 Apr 17;2023:8863318. doi: 10.1155/2023/8863318. eCollection 2023.
4
Overview of Ultrasound in Dentistry for Advancing Research Methodology and Patient Care Quality with Emphasis on Periodontal/Peri-implant Applications.口腔超声在提升研究方法学和患者护理质量方面的概述,重点关注牙周/种植体应用。
Z Med Phys. 2023 Aug;33(3):336-386. doi: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2023.01.005. Epub 2023 Mar 13.
5
Evaluation of post-extraction healing after atraumatic axial tooth extraction using Benex system II versus conventional extraction: Randomized control trial.使用贝内克斯系统II与传统拔牙方法进行无创伤轴向牙齿拔除后拔牙创愈合情况的评估:随机对照试验。
Saudi Dent J. 2021 Dec;33(8):923-928. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2021.09.002. Epub 2021 Sep 14.
6
Ultrasonographic Tissue Perfusion in Peri-implant Health and Disease.超声组织灌注在种植体周围健康与疾病中的应用
J Dent Res. 2022 Mar;101(3):278-285. doi: 10.1177/00220345211035684. Epub 2021 Sep 13.
7
Periodontal Wound Healing and Tissue Regeneration: A Narrative Review.牙周伤口愈合与组织再生:一篇叙述性综述
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2021 May 12;14(5):456. doi: 10.3390/ph14050456.
8
Post-extraction dimensional changes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.拔牙后尺寸变化:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Clin Periodontol. 2021 Jan;48(1):126-144. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13390. Epub 2020 Nov 4.
9
The peri-implant phenotype.种植体周围表型。
J Periodontol. 2020 Mar;91(3):283-288. doi: 10.1002/JPER.19-0566. Epub 2020 Feb 21.
10
Ultrasonography for diagnosis of peri-implant diseases and conditions: a detailed scanning protocol and case demonstration.超声诊断种植体周围疾病和状况:详细的扫描方案及病例展示。
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2020 Oct 1;49(7):20190445. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20190445. Epub 2020 Feb 6.