Popovic Aleksandar, Jain Kunj, Gillan Ernest, Pandher Meher, Alwaal Amjad
Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Newark, NJ.
Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Newark, NJ.
Urology. 2025 Jun;200:91-96. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2025.03.025. Epub 2025 Mar 18.
To assess coverage of male infertility in state laws. Infertility is experienced by 12% of couples, unfortunately, however, infertility treatments are expensive and infrequently covered by insurance. Furthermore, many states lack explicit laws on fertility coverage.
The National Conference of State Legislatures and individual state legislature websites were used to assess fertility coverage. These were queried for health insurance mandates or fertility coverage by evaluating healthcare-related legislation.
Less than half (21/50) of states require coverage. Among these, there is substantial variability in how infertility is defined. A minority (5/21) use the definition of 6 or 12 months of unprotected intercourse in those over or under age 35, respectively, without conception. Others have no length of time stated (7/21) or it ranges from 1 to 5 years (9/21). Some states restrict coverage to specific groups, such as NJ (coverage if under 46 years old). While 19 states include female infertility coverage, only 13 include coverage for males. Lastly, only 6 states include explicit legislation and criteria for treatment of male infertility not related to iatrogenic causes.
Male infertility coverage is lacking across the United States. Male exclusion places greater burden on females, which may lead to missed opportunities to diagnose medical conditions, and miss reversible causes of infertility. Despite recommendations that both partners undergo infertility evaluations, only 6 states have legislation for insurance coverage of non-iatrogenic infertility. Practitioners must be well-acquainted with laws and stay up-to-date in the ever-changing legislative landscape of infertility care.
评估各州法律对男性不育症的覆盖情况。12%的夫妇经历过不育问题,然而不幸的是,不育治疗费用高昂,且很少被保险覆盖。此外,许多州缺乏关于生育覆盖的明确法律。
利用全国州议会会议和各州议会的官方网站评估生育覆盖情况。通过评估与医疗保健相关的立法,查询其中关于医疗保险授权或生育覆盖的内容。
不到一半(21/50)的州要求提供覆盖。在这些州中,不育症的定义存在很大差异。少数州(5/21)分别采用35岁及以上或以下人群在未采取避孕措施的情况下性交6个月或12个月仍未受孕的定义。其他州则未说明时间长度(7/21),或者时间范围从1年到5年不等(9/21)。一些州将覆盖范围限制在特定群体,如新泽西州(46岁以下可覆盖)。虽然19个州包括女性不育症覆盖,但只有13个州包括男性不育症覆盖。最后,只有6个州有关于非医源性原因导致的男性不育症治疗的明确立法和标准。
美国各地都缺乏对男性不育症的覆盖。将男性排除在外给女性带来了更大的负担,这可能导致错过诊断医疗状况的机会,以及错过不育症的可逆病因。尽管建议双方都进行不育症评估,但只有6个州有关于非医源性不育症保险覆盖的立法。从业者必须熟知相关法律,并跟上不育症治疗不断变化的立法形势。