Afenigus Abebe Dilie, Sinshaw Mastewal Ayehu
Department of Nursing, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Debre Markos University, PO Box 269, Debre Markos, Gojjam, Ethiopia.
Tibebe Ghion Specialized Hospital, Bahir Dar University, Bahir Dar, Gojjam, Ethiopia.
BMC Nurs. 2025 Mar 20;24(1):295. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-02958-5.
Ethical dilemmas in emergency and critical care nursing often involve complex decision-making that impacts patient outcomes, emotional well-being of healthcare providers, and team dynamics. Understanding these dilemmas and the decision-making processes involved is crucial for improving nursing practices and patient outcomes in this context.
This study aims to explore the ethical dilemmas and decision-making processes of emergency and critical care nurses, using the Four Box. Method ethical decision-making framework.
A multi-method qualitative approach was employed, incorporating in-depth individual interviews (IDI), focus group discussions (FGD), and case studies to capture diverse perspectives. Data were collected from 28 nurses working in emergency and critical care settings at Tibebe Ghion Specialized Hospital and Felege Hiwot Comprehensive Specialized Hospital through purposive sampling. The interviews and focus groups were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim in Amharic, translated into English, and entered into OpenCode software for analysis. Inductive thematic analysis method was applied to analyze the data.
The study revealed several key ethical dilemmas faced by nurses, including balancing patient autonomy with beneficence, and the allocation of limited resources during crises, opioid administration for pain management vs. respiratory depression, and conflicts regarding informed consent. Nurses reported emotional and professional impacts from these dilemmas, contributing to moral distress, burnout, and ethical fatigue. Nurses emphasized the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration and structured decision-making frameworks to navigate these challenges. However, the lack of consistent access to ethics consultations and peer support during critical moments was noted as a significant barrier.
Nurses encounter complex ethical dilemmas that impact their emotional well-being and job satisfaction. Effective decision-making requires applying ethical principles, adhering to guidelines, and consulting peers. The study reveals the need for improved support systems, including more frequent and comprehensive ethics training, better access to ethics consultations, and structured frameworks to guide decision-making in high-pressure situations.
The study is not a clinical trial, a clinical trial number is not applicable.
急诊与重症护理中的伦理困境常常涉及复杂的决策过程,这会影响患者的治疗结果、医护人员的情绪健康以及团队动态。了解这些困境及其中涉及的决策过程对于改善这一背景下的护理实践和患者治疗结果至关重要。
本研究旨在运用四象限法伦理决策框架,探究急诊与重症护理护士面临的伦理困境及决策过程。
采用多方法质性研究方法,包括深入的个人访谈(IDI)、焦点小组讨论(FGD)和案例研究,以获取不同的观点。通过目的抽样,从提贝贝·吉翁专科医院和费莱格·希沃特综合专科医院的急诊与重症护理科室的28名护士中收集数据。访谈和焦点小组讨论进行了录音,逐字转录为阿姆哈拉语,再翻译成英语,并录入OpenCode软件进行分析。采用归纳主题分析法对数据进行分析。
该研究揭示了护士面临的几个关键伦理困境,包括在患者自主权与行善原则之间取得平衡、危机期间有限资源的分配、使用阿片类药物进行疼痛管理与呼吸抑制之间的权衡,以及在知情同意方面的冲突。护士们报告称,这些困境对他们的情绪和职业产生了影响,导致道德困扰、职业倦怠和伦理疲劳。护士们强调了跨学科协作和结构化决策框架对于应对这些挑战的重要性。然而,在关键时刻缺乏持续的伦理咨询服务和同行支持被视为一个重大障碍。
护士们面临着复杂的伦理困境,这影响着他们的情绪健康和工作满意度。有效的决策需要应用伦理原则、遵循指导方针并咨询同行。该研究表明需要改善支持系统,包括更频繁和全面的伦理培训、更好地获得伦理咨询服务,以及在高压情况下指导决策的结构化框架。
本研究并非临床试验,因此不适用临床试验编号。