Suppr超能文献

桡动脉远端优先:澳大利亚冠状动脉造影和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的可行性与安全性

"Distal radial first": feasibility and safety for coronary angiography and PCI in Australia.

作者信息

Saunders Samantha L, Casinader Sanjeev J, Fernandez Ritin S, Easey Kelly M, Chuah Eunice, Perkovic Adam R, Hariharan Shubhang, Scott David, Mikhail Philopatir, Said Christian, Spina Roberto, May Austin N, Boyle Andrew, Ford Thomas J

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Gosford Hospital, Central Coast Local Health District, Gosford, Australia.

School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.

出版信息

AsiaIntervention. 2025 Mar 20;11(1):35-43. doi: 10.4244/AIJ-D-24-00036. eCollection 2025 Mar.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Distal transradial artery (dTRA) access offers benefits to patients and operators.

AIMS

We sought to determine the feasibility and safety of the dTRA as a first-line vascular access site and to evaluate predictors of dTRA approach success.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study analysed consecutive patients from three Australian centres who underwent coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention via the dTRA (from November 2019 to December 2023). The primary outcome was procedural success (completion of a case using the dTRA puncture site). Secondary outcomes were access site crossover, procedural safety, arterial patency at follow-up, and predictors of procedural success.

RESULTS

A total of 1,692 patients were included (mean age 70.6±10.5 years, 59% male [n=993], mean body mass index [BMI] 31.0±7.0 kg/m, right dTRA 85%, ultrasound guidance 99%). First pass success was achieved in 92.2% (n=1,560) of patients, and 1.5% had success on the second puncture of the ipsilateral dTRA. Crossover was required in 6.3% (n=107; proximal transradial [n=78; 4.6%], contralateral dTRA [n=22; 1.3%], femoral [n=6; 0.4%], ulnar [n=1; 0.1%]). There were no major vascular complications. Access site bleeding requiring treatment occurred in 0.3% (n=5) of cases. Proximal and distal radial occlusion occurred in 0.1% and 0.4%, respectively. Thirty-day major adverse cardiovascular events occurred in 1.4% (n=24). Radial artery patency was 98% (630/641) at follow-up. Hypertension (odds ratio [OR] 1.73; p=0.029), an experienced operator (attending/consultant and ≥4 years' experience with dTRA; OR 2.80; p<0.001), and a low BMI (OR 1.48 per 10 unit decrease in BMI; p=0.012) were predictors of technical success.

CONCLUSIONS

The "distal radial first" approach is feasible and safe for coronary procedures. Factors associated with procedural success include increased operator experience, a low BMI, and hypertension.

摘要

背景

桡动脉远端(dTRA)入路对患者和术者均有益处。

目的

我们试图确定dTRA作为一线血管入路部位的可行性和安全性,并评估dTRA入路成功的预测因素。

方法

这项回顾性队列研究分析了来自澳大利亚三个中心的连续患者,这些患者在2019年11月至2023年12月期间通过dTRA接受了冠状动脉造影和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗。主要结局是手术成功(使用dTRA穿刺部位完成病例)。次要结局包括入路部位转换、手术安全性、随访时动脉通畅情况以及手术成功的预测因素。

结果

共纳入1692例患者(平均年龄70.6±10.5岁,男性59%[n = 993],平均体重指数[BMI]31.0±7.0kg/m²,右侧dTRA 85%,超声引导99%)。92.2%(n = 1560)的患者首次穿刺成功,1.5%的患者在同侧dTRA第二次穿刺时成功。6.3%(n = 107)的患者需要转换入路(桡动脉近端[n = 78;4.6%]、对侧dTRA[n = 22;1.3%]、股动脉[n = 6;0.4%]、尺动脉[n = 1;0.1%])。无重大血管并发症。0.3%(n = 5)的病例发生需要治疗的入路部位出血。桡动脉近端和远端闭塞分别发生在0.1%和0.4%的患者中。30天主要不良心血管事件发生率为1.4%(n = 24)。随访时桡动脉通畅率为98%(630/641)。高血压(比值比[OR]1.73;p = 0.029)、经验丰富的术者(主治医生/顾问且有≥4年dTRA操作经验;OR 2.80;p < 0.001)和低BMI(BMI每降低10单位OR为1.48;p = 0.012)是技术成功的预测因素。

结论

“桡动脉远端优先”入路用于冠状动脉手术是可行且安全的。与手术成功相关的因素包括术者经验增加、低BMI和高血压。

相似文献

1
"Distal radial first": feasibility and safety for coronary angiography and PCI in Australia.
AsiaIntervention. 2025 Mar 20;11(1):35-43. doi: 10.4244/AIJ-D-24-00036. eCollection 2025 Mar.
3
Distal transradial access as default approach for coronary angiography and interventions.
Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2019 Oct;9(5):513-519. doi: 10.21037/cdt.2019.09.06.
5
Distal transradial access for post-CABG coronary and surgical grafts angiography and interventions.
Indian Heart J. 2021 Jul-Aug;73(4):440-445. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2021.06.005. Epub 2021 Jun 15.
6
Feasibility and safety of the successive use of distal transradial access for coronary angiography and intervention in the same arm.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Nov 15;98(6):E796-E801. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29938. Epub 2021 Aug 28.
7
Distal transradial access for cardiac catheterization: A systematic scoping review.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Dec;96(7):1381-1389. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28623. Epub 2019 Nov 29.
9
Feasibility and Safety of Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention via Distal Transradial Access.
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 May 10;8:673858. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.673858. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Distal Radial Access for Coronary Procedures in a Large Prospective Multicenter Registry: The KODRA Trial.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Feb 12;17(3):329-340. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2023.11.021.
4
Efficacy and safety of sheathless guiding catheter for distal radial approach.
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2024 Apr;61:64-67. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2023.11.011. Epub 2023 Nov 18.
5
Preliminary Study on Retrograde Recanalization of Radial Artery Occlusion Through Distal Radial Artery Access: a Single-Center Experience.
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2024 Dec;38(6):1303-1313. doi: 10.1007/s10557-023-07490-9. Epub 2023 Jul 27.
9
Application of ultrasound in cardiovascular intervention the distal radial artery approach: New wine in old bottles?
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Dec 15;9:1019053. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1019053. eCollection 2022.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验