Nedbal Carlotta, Kar Kei Yuen Steffi, Tramanzoli Pietro, Maggi Martina, Giulioni Carlo, De Stefano Virgilio, Nicoletti Rossella, Pavia Maria Pia, Pirola Giacomo Maria, Lim Ee Jean, Chai Chu Ann, So Wei Zheng, Galosi Andrea Benedetto, Somani Bhaskar Kumar, Castellani Daniele, Gauhar Vineet
Urology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Marche Polytechnic University, Ancona, Italy.
Department of Urology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Cent European J Urol. 2024;77(3):547-565. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2024.89. Epub 2024 Sep 30.
To provide a comprehensive review of survey trends in urology, aiming to provide insight into changes in publication in the new millennium. Surveys in healthcare allow for a better understanding of the knowledge, attitudes, and practice patterns as well as gaps in healthcare systems.
A comprehensive review of all "surveys in urology answered by urologists" was performed through the PubMed and Scopus databases, according to the SPICE framework. Included surveys were divided according to the subject: "Uro-oncology", "Urolithiasis", "Mental health" "Resident training", and "Miscellaneous". Publications were then divided into 2 main periods: Period-1 (2000-2011) and Period-2 (2012-2023).
A total of 361 surveys have been published since 2000, with a significant overall increasing trend in the recent decade (p <0.001). A significantly increasing focus is seen for publications on resident training (n = 86; +660%; p = 0.003), mental health (n = 31; +650%; p = 0.001), urolithiasis (n = 40; +371%; p = 0.002), and uro-oncology (n = 94; +230%, p ≤0.001). In subanalysis, the largest increase in publications was noted for surveys on radical prostatectomy (+175%, p = 0.024), surgical treatment of urolithiasis (+320%, p = 0.040), quality of resident education (+483%, p <0.001), and personal satisfaction with resident training (+500%, p = 0.005).
Over the decades, surveys have served as an effective interactive tool for urologists to engage and investigate different aspects of practice and training across sub-specialties. In modern times, better evaluation tools integrated with AI will provide a bigger platform for urologists to use surveys as part of their armamentarium to address and evaluate not only clinical practices but also emotional challenges, training needs, and inequalities that hinder progress in urology.
全面回顾泌尿外科的调查趋势,旨在洞察新千年出版物的变化。医疗保健领域的调查有助于更好地了解知识、态度、实践模式以及医疗保健系统中的差距。
根据SPICE框架,通过PubMed和Scopus数据库对所有“泌尿外科医生回答的泌尿外科调查”进行全面回顾。纳入的调查根据主题分为:“泌尿肿瘤学”、“尿石症”、“心理健康”、“住院医师培训”和“其他”。然后将出版物分为两个主要时期:时期1(2000 - 2011年)和时期2(2012 - 2023年)。
自2000年以来共发表了361项调查,近十年总体呈显著增长趋势(p <0.001)。住院医师培训(n = 86;增长660%;p = 0.003)、心理健康(n = 31;增长650%;p = 0.001)、尿石症(n = 40;增长371%;p = 0.002)和泌尿肿瘤学(n = 94;增长230%,p≤0.001)方面的出版物关注度显著增加。在亚分析中,前列腺癌根治术调查(增长175%,p = 0.024)、尿石症手术治疗(增长320%,p = 0.040)、住院医师教育质量(增长483%,p <0.001)以及对住院医师培训的个人满意度(增长500%,p = 0.005)的出版物增加幅度最大。
几十年来,调查一直是泌尿外科医生参与和研究各亚专业实践与培训不同方面的有效互动工具。在现代,与人工智能集成的更好评估工具将为泌尿外科医生提供更大的平台,使他们能够将调查作为其工具库的一部分,不仅用于解决和评估临床实践,还用于应对情感挑战、培训需求以及阻碍泌尿外科进展的不平等问题。