Ettenberg A, Carlisle H J
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1985 May;22(5):761-7. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(85)90525-8.
The hypothesis that neuroleptic drugs interfere with operant behaviors by attenuating the rewarding properties of positive reinforcers, was examined in rats trained to lever-press for external heat in a cold environment. Unlike traditional reinforcers, such as food and water, reducing the reward magnitude of heat (by reducing the intensity or duration of the stimulus) results in compensatory increases in operant responding. Neuroleptic pretreatment (0.1, 0.2, 0,4 mg/kg of alpha-flupenthixol) produced only dose-dependent decreases in responding thereby interfering with the animals' ability to behaviorally maintain their internal core temperature. In a temperature-gradient test paradigm (requiring less physical effort on the part of the subjects) alpha-flupenthixol did not alter the animals' preferred environmental temperature, nor did it disrupt behavioral thermoregulatory ability. These data suggest that at least part of the behavioral deficit observed during neuroleptic treatment is due to a disruption in the performance capabilities of the subjects.
在寒冷环境中训练大鼠通过按压杠杆获取外部热量的实验中,检验了抗精神病药物通过减弱正强化物的奖赏特性来干扰操作性行为的假说。与食物和水等传统强化物不同,降低热量的奖赏幅度(通过降低刺激强度或持续时间)会导致操作性反应的代偿性增加。抗精神病药物预处理(0.1、0.2、0.4毫克/千克的α-氟奋乃静)仅产生了与剂量相关的反应减少,从而干扰了动物行为性维持其体内核心温度的能力。在温度梯度测试范式中(受试者所需体力较小),α-氟奋乃静既未改变动物偏好的环境温度,也未破坏行为性体温调节能力。这些数据表明,在抗精神病药物治疗期间观察到的行为缺陷至少部分是由于受试者的表现能力受到破坏。