Enechukwu Nkechi Anne, Akuakolam Ikenna, Aghanya Iloduba Nnaemeka, Anaje Chetanna Chioma, Ezejiofor Ogochukwu Ifeanyi, Errichetti Enzo
Department of Internal Medicine, Nnamdi Azikiwe University/Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital, Nnewi, Nigeria.
Faculty of Medicine, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Nnewi Campus, Nigeria.
Dermatol Pract Concept. 2025 Jan 30;15(1):4848. doi: 10.5826/dpc.1501a4848.
Scabies, a parasitic infestation caused by Sarcoptes scabiei var hominis, affects individuals of diverse skin types. While definitive diagnosis involves identifying adult mites, eggs, or scybala from the microscopy of scrapings obtained from representative sites, it is invasive, time-consuming, and not feasible in very young or non-cooperative patients. Dermoscopy is an evolving non-invasive procedure useful in dermatological diagnosis. The handheld dermatoscope is portable and valuable for epidemics and in vivo use. There are sparse data on the diagnostic accuracy of dermoscopy versus microscopy in darker skin phototypes, a demographic for which dermoscopy have been understudied.
This study aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of dermoscopy with microscopy in dark skin.
Consecutive patients attending the dermatology clinic at Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital, Nnewi, Nigeria, with clinical suspicion of scabies underwent dermoscopic and microscopic examination. Definitive diagnosis was retrospective, and a comparative assessment between dermoscopy and microscopy was conducted.
Dermoscopic and microscopic evidence was observed in 48.3% and 46.7%, respectively. While the serpiginous tract had a sensitivity and specificity of 75.9% and 80.6%, respectively, delta sign was 75% and 55.4%, respectively. Both dermoscopy and microscopy demonstrated a sensitivity and specificity of 75% and 55.4%, respectively. The delta glider sign was seen in four participants.
Dermoscopy is particularly effective in identifying the serpiginous tract of scabies on dark skin, although it is less effective for detecting the delta sign. Non-specific dermoscopic features may frequently be seen. Future studies should modify criteria for darker skin to enhance clinical accuracy.
疥疮是由人型疥螨引起的一种寄生虫感染,可影响各种皮肤类型的个体。虽然确诊需要通过从代表性部位刮取物的显微镜检查来识别成年螨虫、虫卵或粪球,但这种方法具有侵入性、耗时,且在非常年幼或不配合的患者中不可行。皮肤镜检查是一种不断发展的非侵入性检查方法,在皮肤病诊断中很有用。手持式皮肤镜便于携带,在流行病学研究和活体检查中很有价值。关于皮肤镜检查与显微镜检查在深肤色人群中的诊断准确性的数据较少,而这一人群对皮肤镜检查的研究不足。
本研究旨在比较皮肤镜检查与显微镜检查在深肤色人群中诊断疥疮的准确性。
在尼日利亚纽维的纳姆迪·阿齐克韦大学教学医院皮肤科门诊,对临床怀疑患有疥疮的连续患者进行了皮肤镜和显微镜检查。确诊是回顾性的,并对皮肤镜检查和显微镜检查进行了比较评估。
分别有48.3%和46.7%的患者观察到皮肤镜和显微镜检查的证据。匐行疹的敏感性和特异性分别为75.9%和80.6%,而三角征的敏感性和特异性分别为75%和55.4%。皮肤镜检查和显微镜检查的敏感性和特异性分别为75%和55.4%。四名参与者出现了三角滑翔征。
皮肤镜检查在识别深肤色人群中的疥疮匐行疹方面特别有效,尽管在检测三角征方面效果较差。可能经常会看到非特异性的皮肤镜特征。未来的研究应修改针对深肤色人群的标准,以提高临床准确性。