Suppr超能文献

皮肤镜检查、光学显微镜检查及实时聚合酶链反应在疥疮诊断中的应用。初步结果。

Dermoscopy, light microscopy, and real-time polymerase chain reaction for the diagnosis of scabies. Preliminary results.

作者信息

Kosmala Aleksandra, Kowalczyk Michał J, Żaba Ryszard

机构信息

Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.

出版信息

Postepy Dermatol Alergol. 2021 Aug;38(4):578-584. doi: 10.5114/ada.2020.94275. Epub 2020 Apr 7.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Scabies is a widespread, contagious parasitic disease causing intense itching. Its detection is a significant problem while there are no internationally agreed standards.

AIM

To compare diagnostic methods: microscopy of skin scrapings, dermoscopy, and real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) of skin scrapings and wet skin swabs.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We included patients with clinical signs of scabies. After dermoscopic evaluation, scrapings were collected from skin lesions and assessed by light microscopy and real-time PCR. Wet skin swabs were also analysed by real-time PCR. Surveys on the presence and severity of pruritus and skin lesions were collected. Seventy-five skin scrapings and 41 wet swabs were examined by real-time PCR. Fifty-three patients completed the survey. All patients underwent dermoscopy and microscopy examinations. 6.67% were positive by microscopy, 10.7% by dermoscopy, 28.0% by real-time PCR from scrapings, and 36.6% when both scrapings and swabs were examined by real-time PCR. All microscopy-positive results were also positive by PCR.

RESULTS

There was a correlation between real-time PCR from positive scrapings and pruritus ( = 0.023) and body surface area of lesions ( = 0.002), a correlation between copies from wet skin swabs and BSA of lesions ( = 0.002) in the whole group, and a correlation between copies of from scrapings and age ( = 0.038).

CONCLUSIONS

Real-time PCR testing of scrapings and dermoscopy are more effective than microscopy. Combined real-time PCR testing of scrapings and skin swabs seemed the most effective. Clinical signs alone should not be used as unambiguous criteria.

摘要

引言

疥疮是一种广泛传播的、具有传染性的寄生虫病,会引起剧烈瘙痒。在缺乏国际公认标准的情况下,其检测是一个重大问题。

目的

比较诊断方法:皮肤刮片显微镜检查、皮肤镜检查以及皮肤刮片和湿皮肤拭子的实时聚合酶链反应(PCR)。

材料与方法

我们纳入了有疥疮临床症状的患者。在进行皮肤镜评估后,从皮肤病变处采集刮片,并通过光学显微镜和实时PCR进行评估。湿皮肤拭子也通过实时PCR进行分析。收集了关于瘙痒和皮肤病变的存在及严重程度的调查。75份皮肤刮片和41份湿拭子通过实时PCR进行检测。53名患者完成了调查。所有患者均接受了皮肤镜和显微镜检查。显微镜检查阳性率为6.67%,皮肤镜检查为10.7%,刮片实时PCR检测为28.0%,刮片和拭子均进行实时PCR检测时为36.6%。所有显微镜检查阳性结果通过PCR检测也均为阳性。

结果

阳性刮片的实时PCR与瘙痒(r = 0.023)和病变体表面积(r = 0.002)之间存在相关性,在整个组中,湿皮肤拭子的拷贝数与病变体表面积(r = 0.002)之间存在相关性,刮片的拷贝数与年龄(r = 0.038)之间存在相关性。

结论

刮片实时PCR检测和皮肤镜检查比显微镜检查更有效。刮片和皮肤拭子联合实时PCR检测似乎是最有效的。仅临床症状不应作为明确的标准。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b51/8501433/7c423834335c/PDIA-38-40321-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验