Souto Catarina, Aguilar Borja, Dias Vânia, Pascual Enrique, Farinha Gabriel, Marcelino Carlos, Rodrigues Carlos, Teles Pedro, Perez-Rozos Alberto, Sallabanda Morena, Sallabanda Kita
IRCA, Hospital Viamed Santa Elena, Madrid, Spain; Mercurius Health, Porto Salvo, Portugal; DFA, Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.
IRCA, Hospital Viamed Santa Elena, Madrid, Spain; Mercurius Health, Porto Salvo, Portugal.
Phys Med. 2025 May;133:104952. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2025.104952. Epub 2025 Mar 21.
The very unconventional design and features of the new gyroscopic radiosurgery ZAP-X® system (ZAP Surgical Systems) generates a challenge for beam data acquisition, characterization and validation. Treatment Planning System commissioning was performed with different detectors, filling the absence of methodologies and correction factors published in international guidelines. The congruence of detectors response was compared with corresponding SciMoCa Monte Carlo (MC) synthetic data (Scientific RT GmbH). A machine and patient-specific quality assurance (QA) protocol was also implemented.
All data were acquired using a microsilicon and a microdiamond detectors, three ionization chambers (PTW Freiburg) and a plastic scintillation detector (PSD) (Blue Physics LLC). For patient-specific QA, an anthropomorphic phantom (RT Safe Inc), a 2D array (Sun Nuclear Corporation) and SciMoCa were used for 1D dose verification, 2D and 3D evaluation gamma assessment, respectively.
Agreement between detectors, for all PDDs, was better than 1% beyond the depth of dmax. For profiles, the microsilicon detector showed steeper penumbras due to the smaller detector width. A good congruence with MC data was found for the solid-state detectors. Output factors measurements demonstrated strong agreement between SciMoCa data and PSD data, with a maximum difference of 2.1%. The patient QA results validated the quality of the commissioning data.
Our results showed strong agreement between different measurement methods. MC simulations proved to be an important tool for commissioning validation. The methods and materials discussed in this article may be of use to other facilities where this SRS gyroscope system is installed.
新型陀螺式放射外科手术ZAP-X®系统(ZAP Surgical Systems公司)的非常规设计和特性给射束数据采集、特性描述及验证带来了挑战。治疗计划系统调试使用了不同的探测器,以填补国际指南中未公布的方法和校正因子的空白。将探测器响应的一致性与相应的SciMoCa蒙特卡罗(MC)合成数据(Scientific RT GmbH公司)进行了比较。还实施了针对机器和患者的质量保证(QA)方案。
所有数据均使用微硅探测器、微金刚石探测器、三个电离室(PTW弗莱堡公司)和一个塑料闪烁探测器(PSD)(Blue Physics LLC公司)采集。针对患者特定的QA,分别使用拟人化体模(RT Safe Inc公司)、二维阵列(太阳核公司)和SciMoCa进行一维剂量验证、二维和三维评估伽马评估。
对于所有百分深度剂量(PDD),探测器之间在dmax深度之外的一致性优于1%。对于剂量分布曲线,微硅探测器由于探测器宽度较小而显示出更陡的半影。固态探测器与MC数据具有良好的一致性。输出因子测量表明SciMoCa数据与PSD数据之间具有高度一致性,最大差异为2.1%。患者QA结果验证了调试数据的质量。
我们的结果表明不同测量方法之间具有高度一致性。MC模拟被证明是调试验证的重要工具。本文讨论的方法和材料可能对安装了这种立体定向放射外科(SRS)陀螺系统的其他机构有用。