Shafer Steven L, Ririe Douglas G, Miller Scott, Curry Regina S, Hsu David T, Sullivan Gregory M, Eisenach James C
Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Department of Anesthesiology, Advocate Health Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Br J Anaesth. 2025 May;134(5):1513-1522. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2024.12.046. Epub 2025 Mar 21.
The development of oxytocin as a therapeutic agent outside of obstetrics has been hampered by antibody-based assays that lack specificity, leading to inconsistent and incompletely reported pharmacokinetic models to guide drug dosing. This study describes the population plasma pharmacokinetics of intravenous and intranasal oxytocin using a sensitive and specific liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectroscopy (LC/MS) assay.
Two studies in healthy adult men and nonpregnant women were performed, the first with intravenous oxytocin 16.7 μg over 1 or 10 min and the second with intravenous oxytocin 13.7 μg over 30 min and, on a separate day, intranasal oxytocin 100 μg (n=24). Venous plasma oxytocin concentration was measured using LC/MS and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated using NONMEM.
The pharmacokinetics of intravenous oxytocin were well described by a two-compartment model (0% bias, 18% median inaccuracy). The two-compartment model for intranasal oxytocin was characterised by substantial subject-to-subject variability (9% median bias, 47% median inaccuracy). Nasal oxytocin bioavailability was 0.7%. Oxytocin samples assayed with LC/MS were systematically higher than simultaneous samples assayed with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.
The pharmacokinetics of intravenous oxytocin are well described by a two-compartment model. The low bioavailability (<1%) and large intersubject variability in plasma oxytocin after intranasal dosing could partially explain the inconsistent reports of oxytocin efficacy in the clinical literature with this delivery method. A publicly available simulator was created to guide oxytocin dosing in future studies.
NCT03929367 (Study 1) and NCT05672667 (Study 2).
催产素在产科以外作为治疗药物的开发受到缺乏特异性的基于抗体的检测方法的阻碍,导致用于指导药物剂量的药代动力学模型不一致且报告不完整。本研究使用灵敏且特异的液相色谱 - 串联质谱(LC/MS)检测方法描述了静脉内和鼻内给予催产素后的群体血浆药代动力学。
对健康成年男性和未怀孕女性进行了两项研究,第一项研究静脉注射16.7μg催产素,持续1或10分钟,第二项研究静脉注射13.7μg催产素,持续30分钟,且在另一天给予100μg鼻内催产素(n = 24)。使用LC/MS和酶联免疫吸附测定法测量静脉血浆催产素浓度。使用NONMEM估计药代动力学参数。
静脉内给予催产素的药代动力学可用二室模型很好地描述(偏差0%,中位不准确度18%)。鼻内给予催产素的二室模型的特征是个体间差异很大(中位偏差9%,中位不准确度47%)。鼻内催产素的生物利用度为0.7%。用LC/MS检测的催产素样本系统地高于同时用酶联免疫吸附测定法检测的样本。
静脉内给予催产素的药代动力学可用二室模型很好地描述。鼻内给药后催产素的低生物利用度(<1%)和血浆中个体间的巨大差异可能部分解释了临床文献中关于这种给药方法的催产素疗效的不一致报告。创建了一个公开可用的模拟器,以指导未来研究中的催产素给药。
NCT03929367(研究1)和NCT05672667(研究2)。