Suppr超能文献

高强度聚焦超声与Airflow®在清除附着钛的变形链球菌生物膜方面的比较。

High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Versus Airflow® in Debriding Ti-Attached S. mutans Biofilms.

作者信息

Tran Minh Dien, Rajan Sheetal Maria, Ngo Hien, Fawzy Amr

机构信息

Biomaterials Research Group, UWA Dental School, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.

Biomaterials Research Group, UWA Dental School, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.

出版信息

Int Dent J. 2025 Jun;75(3):1532-1543. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2024.12.037. Epub 2025 Mar 22.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND AIMS

Effective management of biofilm-associated peri-implantitis requires the eradication of microbial biofilms to control disease progression and preserve implant osseointegration. However, achieving complete biofilm removal remains a challenge. High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) is an emerging technology offering non-ionizing radiation, no extraneous materials, and minimal residuals or aerosols. This in vitro study compared the effectiveness of HIFU and a commercial air-pressured abrasive method (Airflow®) in removing Streptococcus mutans biofilms attached to Titanium (Ti) discs.

METHODS

Bacterial biofilms were grown on 36 pairs of machined (M) and roughened (R) Ti discs for 10 days. Biofilms in the test group (12 pairs) were treated with the optimized HIFU for 2 min in a water medium and the residual biofilms were examined using two imaging methods, confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and three quantitative methods including crystal violet (CV), 3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5 diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT) and flow cytometry (FCM) assays for biomass, bacterial viability, and live/dead bacterial counts respectively. The data from the test and the control samples (untreated and Airflow® treated) were subjected to ANOVA followed by post-hoc Tukey's test to determine the statistical differences between the groups.

RESULTS

Except the MTT data from M discs, the findings showed that both HIFU and Airflow® methods achieved similar levels of bacterial debridement, removing over 99% of bacteria in FCM assays (99.8 ± 0.16% versus 99.3 ± 0.49% for M discs, 99.96 ± 0.02% versus 99.5 ± 0.37% in for R discs). Complete biofilm removal was noted in HIFU-treated samples compared to the Airflow® in SEM images.

CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Our findings indicate that both novel HIFU and traditional Airflow® methods were equally effective in removing the S. mutans biofilms from titanium disc surfaces. Further research is needed to explore the clinical application of HIFU in managing peri-implantitis.

摘要

引言与目的

有效管理生物膜相关性种植体周围炎需要根除微生物生物膜,以控制疾病进展并维持种植体骨整合。然而,实现生物膜的完全清除仍然是一项挑战。高强度聚焦超声(HIFU)是一种新兴技术,具有非电离辐射、无外来物质以及极少的残留物或气溶胶。这项体外研究比较了HIFU和一种商用气压研磨方法(Airflow®)在去除附着于钛(Ti)盘上的变形链球菌生物膜方面的有效性。

方法

在36对经过加工(M)和粗糙化(R)处理的Ti盘上培养细菌生物膜10天。测试组(12对)中的生物膜在水介质中用优化后的HIFU处理2分钟,然后使用两种成像方法,即共聚焦激光扫描显微镜(CLSM)和扫描电子显微镜(SEM),以及三种定量方法,包括结晶紫(CV)、3-[4,5-二甲基噻唑-2-基]-2,5-二苯基四氮唑溴盐(MTT)和流式细胞术(FCM)检测,分别用于检测生物量、细菌活力以及活/死细菌计数。对测试样本和对照样本(未处理及经Airflow®处理)的数据进行方差分析,随后进行事后Tukey检验,以确定各组之间的统计学差异。

结果

除了M盘的MTT数据外,研究结果表明,HIFU和Airflow®方法在细菌清创方面达到了相似的水平,在FCM检测中去除了超过99%的细菌(M盘分别为99.8±0.16%和99.3±0.49%,R盘分别为99.96±0.02%和99.5±0.37%)。与Airflow®处理的样本相比,SEM图像显示HIFU处理的样本实现了生物膜的完全清除。

结论与临床意义

我们的研究结果表明,新型HIFU和传统的Airflow®方法在从钛盘表面去除变形链球菌生物膜方面同样有效。需要进一步研究以探索HIFU在种植体周围炎管理中的临床应用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30e5/11982474/644c06af61c8/gr1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验