• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

获得加拿大卫生部有条件批准的肿瘤学产品的治疗价值:一项横断面研究。

Therapeutic value of oncology products with a conditional approval from Health Canada: a cross-sectional study.

作者信息

Lexchin Joel

机构信息

School of Health Policy and Management, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

出版信息

JRSM Open. 2025 Mar 19;16(3):20542704251325314. doi: 10.1177/20542704251325314. eCollection 2025 Mar.

DOI:10.1177/20542704251325314
PMID:40124210
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11924082/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Investigate the additional therapeutic value compared to existing medicines of new oncology drugs given a conditional approval (Notice of Compliance with conditions, NOC/c) by Health Canada using therapeutic ratings from four independent organisations.

DESIGN

A list of all new oncology drugs with an NOC/c from the start of the programme in 1998 to the end of 2023 was constructed. First-in-class and orphan drug status was determined for all drugs. Therapeutic ratings were obtained from the Canadian Patented Medicine Prices Review Board, the French drug bulletin Prescrire International, the French agency Haute Autorité de Santé and the German Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care. If more than one organisation rated the drug, the highest rating was used.

SETTING

Canada.

PARTICIPANTS

Oncology drugs with a conditional approval.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Additional therapeutic gain compared to existing products.

RESULTS

Fifty-four oncology drugs were approved. Conditions were fulfilled for 29, fulfilment was still pending for 22 and 3 drugs were either discontinued by the manufacturer or placed on restricted access. Eighteen drugs had both orphan drug and first-in-class status. Therapeutic evaluations were available for 50 drugs, and the distribution of additional therapeutic value was examined for the entire group of 50 drugs, for 29 drugs that had fulfilled their conditions and for 18 drugs with both orphan drug and first-in-class status. In the three groups, 8.0%, 10.3% and 11.7%, respectively, offered major therapeutic improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

Few new oncology drugs approved through the NOC/c pathway offer major therapeutic improvements over existing drugs.

摘要

目的

利用四个独立组织的治疗评级,调查加拿大卫生部有条件批准(合规通知,NOC/c)的新型肿瘤药物相对于现有药物的额外治疗价值。

设计

构建了一份从1998年该计划启动至2023年底所有获得NOC/c的新型肿瘤药物清单。确定了所有药物的首创药物和孤儿药地位。从加拿大专利药品价格审查委员会、法国药品公告《Prescrire International》、法国卫生高级管理局和德国医疗质量与效率研究所获得治疗评级。如果有多个组织对该药物进行评级,则采用最高评级。

地点

加拿大。

参与者

有条件批准的肿瘤药物。

主要观察指标

相对于现有产品的额外治疗获益。

结果

54种肿瘤药物获得批准。29种药物的条件已满足,22种药物的条件仍在等待满足,3种药物已被制造商停产或被限制使用。18种药物同时具有孤儿药和首创药物地位。对50种药物进行了治疗评估,并对全部50种药物、29种已满足条件的药物以及18种同时具有孤儿药和首创药物地位的药物的额外治疗价值分布进行了检查。在这三组中,分别有8.0%、10.3%和11.7%的药物带来了重大治疗改善。

结论

通过NOC/c途径批准的新型肿瘤药物中,很少有能比现有药物带来重大治疗改善的。

相似文献

1
Therapeutic value of oncology products with a conditional approval from Health Canada: a cross-sectional study.获得加拿大卫生部有条件批准的肿瘤学产品的治疗价值:一项横断面研究。
JRSM Open. 2025 Mar 19;16(3):20542704251325314. doi: 10.1177/20542704251325314. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
Canadian status of "not acceptable" drugs as evaluated by Prescrire: A cohort study.《Prescrire》评估的加拿大“不可接受”药物状况:一项队列研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 1;19(8):e0308118. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308118. eCollection 2024.
3
Health Canada's Use of its Notice of Compliance With Conditions Drug Approval Policy: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis.加拿大卫生部使用有条件批准药物的合规通知政策:一项回顾性队列分析。
Int J Health Serv. 2019 Apr;49(2):294-305. doi: 10.1177/0020731418821007. Epub 2018 Dec 26.
4
Health Canada's use of its priority review process for new drugs: a cohort study.加拿大卫生部对新药使用优先审评程序的队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2015 May 11;5(5):e006816. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006816.
5
Canadian status of "drugs to avoid" in 2017: a descriptive analysis.2017年加拿大“避免使用的药物”状况:描述性分析
CMAJ Open. 2018 Sep 28;6(3):E430-E435. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20180049. Print 2018 Jul-Sep.
6
Health Canada's use of expedited review pathways and therapeutic innovation, 1995-2016: cross-sectional analysis.1995 - 2016年加拿大卫生部对加速审查途径和治疗创新的应用:横断面分析
BMJ Open. 2018 Aug 30;8(8):e023605. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023605.
7
Accelerating Oncology Drug Reimbursement in Canada: Impact of the CDA-AMC Time-Limited Recommendation and pCPA Temporary Access Process.加快加拿大肿瘤药物报销:加拿大药品管理局 - 安大略癌症中心限时推荐及优先癌症药物临时准入程序的影响
Curr Oncol. 2025 Apr 17;32(4):235. doi: 10.3390/curroncol32040235.
8
Time to completion of conditions required by Health Canada after approving new drugs: A cohort study.加拿大卫生部批准新药后完成所需条件的时间:一项队列研究。
Health Policy. 2025 May;155:105314. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2025.105314. Epub 2025 Apr 2.
9
A comparison of the Food and Drug Administration's and Health Canada's regulatory decisions about failed confirmatory trials for oncology drugs: an observational study.美国食品药品监督管理局与加拿大卫生部针对肿瘤药物确证性试验失败所做监管决策的比较:一项观察性研究
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2021 Oct 28;14(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s40545-021-00375-y.
10
Added benefit and revenues of oncology drugs approved by the European Medicines Agency between 1995 and 2020: retrospective cohort study.1995 年至 2020 年间欧洲药品管理局批准的肿瘤药物的附加获益和收益:回顾性队列研究。
BMJ. 2024 Feb 28;384:e077391. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2023-077391.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical Benefit and Regulatory Outcomes of Cancer Drugs Receiving Accelerated Approval.癌症药物加速审批的临床获益和监管结果。
JAMA. 2024 May 7;331(17):1471-1479. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.2396.
2
Quality and quantity of data used by Health Canada in approving new drugs.加拿大卫生部在批准新药时所使用数据的质量和数量。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Nov 30;10:1299239. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1299239. eCollection 2023.
3
The Origin of First-in-Class Drugs: Innovation Versus Clinical Benefit.首创药物的起源:创新与临床获益。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2024 Feb;115(2):342-348. doi: 10.1002/cpt.3110. Epub 2023 Dec 7.
4
Therapeutic Value of Drugs Granted Accelerated Approval or Conditional Marketing Authorization in the US and Europe From 2007 to 2021.2007 年至 2021 年美国和欧洲加速批准或有条件上市药物的治疗价值。
JAMA Health Forum. 2022 Aug 5;3(8):e222685. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.2685.
5
Conditional Drug Approval as a Path to Market for Oncology Drugs in Canada: Challenges and Recommendations for Assessing Eligibility and Regulatory Responsiveness.加拿大肿瘤药物的有条件药物批准上市途径:评估资格和监管响应性的挑战与建议
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Feb 3;8:818647. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.818647. eCollection 2021.
6
Few new drugs deserve expedited regulatory treatment.很少有新药值得加快监管审批。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2021 May;27(5):685-688. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2021.27.5.685.
7
A Decade of FDA-Approved Drugs (2010-2019): Trends and Future Directions.十年间美国食品药品监督管理局批准的药物(2010 - 2019年):趋势与未来方向
J Med Chem. 2021 Mar 11;64(5):2312-2338. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.0c01516. Epub 2021 Feb 22.
8
Evaluation of the Clinical Benefit of Cancer Drugs Submitted for Reimbursement Recommendation Decisions in Canada.对提交用于加拿大报销推荐决策的癌症药物临床益处的评估。
JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Apr 1;181(4):499-508. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.8588.
9
Association between FDA and EMA expedited approval programs and therapeutic value of new medicines: retrospective cohort study.FDA 和 EMA 加速审批计划与新药的治疗价值之间的关联:回顾性队列研究。
BMJ. 2020 Oct 7;371:m3434. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m3434.
10
Assessment of the Clinical Benefit of Cancer Drugs Receiving Accelerated Approval.加速批准的癌症药物的临床获益评估。
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Jul 1;179(7):906-913. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.0462.