Lexchin Joel
Professor Emeritus, School of Health Policy and Management, York University, 4700 Keele St., ON, M3J 1P3, Toronto, Canada.
Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2021 Oct 28;14(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s40545-021-00375-y.
Oncology drugs are frequently approved on the basis of surrogate outcomes that require further trials to confirm the benefits, but at times these trials fail and regulators need to decide whether to withdraw approval for the indication and/or to remove the drug from the market. This study compares decisions by the Food and Drug Administration and Health Canada about oncology drugs that were approved using either Accelerated Approval (FDA) or Notice of Compliance with conditions (NOC/c, Health Canada) and that failed confirmatory trials.
Drug/indications approved by the FDA through its Accelerated Approval Pathway and that later failed confirmatory studies were identified from a published study and additional information on these drugs was collected from Drugs@FDA. Health Canada websites were searched on September 11, 2021 for the same group of drugs to determine if they were approved in Canada under the NOC/c pathway for the same indication as in the US. Information from both the FDA and Health Canada about these products was entered into an Excel spreadsheet. Decisions about whether to withdraw the drugs or remove the failed indication for the drug and requirements for confirmatory studies were compared. In addition, the dates of decisions by the two agencies were compared.
Ten drug/indications were available for comparison. Regulatory decisions were similar in 4 cases, different in 1 case and could not be determined in the remaining 5, in 1 case because decisions were pending in both countries and in the other 4, because the NOC/c had not been fulfilled in Canada. The requirements for the confirmatory studies were similar in both countries. Decisions were made earlier in the United States.
This study shows that decisions made by Health Canada and the FDA about whether to withdraw a drug or remove a failed indication when drug/indications fail a confirmatory trial are usually similar, although the sample size on which this conclusion is made is small. The clinical implications of these similarities and differences should be explored.
肿瘤学药物通常基于替代终点获得批准,这需要进一步试验来证实其益处,但有时这些试验会失败,监管机构需要决定是否撤销该适应症的批准和/或将该药物撤出市场。本研究比较了美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)和加拿大卫生部关于通过加速批准(FDA)或有条件批准通知(NOC/c,加拿大卫生部)获批且确证性试验失败的肿瘤学药物的决策。
通过一项已发表的研究确定FDA通过其加速批准途径批准但随后确证性研究失败的药物/适应症,并从Drugs@FDA收集这些药物的其他信息。于2021年9月11日在加拿大卫生部网站上搜索同一组药物,以确定它们在加拿大是否根据NOC/c途径获批用于与美国相同的适应症。将FDA和加拿大卫生部关于这些产品的信息录入Excel电子表格。比较关于是否撤回药物或撤销药物失败适应症的决策以及确证性研究的要求。此外,比较了两个机构的决策日期。
有10种药物/适应症可供比较。4例监管决策相似,1例不同,其余5例无法确定,1例是因为两国的决策均在等待中,另外4例是因为加拿大未满足NOC/c要求。两国确证性研究的要求相似。美国的决策更早做出。
本研究表明,加拿大卫生部和FDA在药物/适应症确证性试验失败时关于是否撤回药物或撤销失败适应症的决策通常相似,尽管得出这一结论的样本量较小。应探讨这些异同的临床意义。