Hunter Dana J, Black Amanda M, Culos-Reed S Nicole, Lun Victor M Y, Mohtadi Nicholas G
Sport Medicine Centre, Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Clin J Sport Med. 2025 Mar 18;35(4):423-430. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0000000000001315.
(1) To estimate adherence to brace wearing for medial collateral ligament (MCL) injuries across 3 phases of conventional treatment and (2) to explore predictors of adherence for each phase.
Exploratory cohort study.
Primary care center.
Fifty-nine patients aged 18 to 65 (27 men, 32 women) from a randomized clinical trial examined the effectiveness of 2 bracing techniques (0-90 degrees or 30-90 degrees) for acute isolated MCL or combined anterior cruciate ligament injuries. Patients were prescribed a 6-week bracing protocol and were followed for 12 weeks.
Patients were prescribed constant brace wearing for 4 weeks (∼23 h/d), then daytime wear only (∼15 h/d) until brace discontinuation at 6 weeks. Rehabilitation exercises were prescribed from 2 weeks onward. Adherence to the protocol was assessed through daily self-reported logs. Clinical and patient-reported outcomes were collected throughout the randomized clinical trial (baseline, 2, 4, and 6 weeks). This study interpreted them as predictor variables of treatment adherence alongside patient and treatment characteristics.
Adherence to each 2-week phase, interpreted dichotomously (adherer or nonadherer). Adherers were identified as those who wore their brace according to the protocol.
Adherence and pain decreased, while overall knee ratings improved throughout the treatment. Pain, affected knee, and brace range-of-motion settings were significant predictors of adherence in the exploratory logistic regressions.
Pain, affected knee, and brace range-of-motion settings were the primary predictors of brace wearing in the first 4 weeks of treatment. This study is the first to provide insight into MCL bracing adherence, potentially aiding clinicians in treatment management.
(1)评估在传统治疗的三个阶段中内侧副韧带(MCL)损伤患者佩戴支具的依从性,以及(2)探索每个阶段依从性的预测因素。
探索性队列研究。
初级保健中心。
来自一项随机临床试验的59名年龄在18至65岁之间的患者(27名男性,32名女性),该试验研究了两种支具技术(0 - 90度或30 - 90度)对急性孤立性MCL损伤或合并前交叉韧带损伤的有效性。患者被规定佩戴支具6周,并随访12周。
患者被规定持续佩戴支具4周(约23小时/天),然后仅在白天佩戴(约15小时/天),直至6周时停止佩戴支具。从第2周开始规定进行康复锻炼。通过每日自我报告日志评估对方案的依从性。在整个随机临床试验(基线、第2、4和6周)中收集临床和患者报告的结果。本研究将这些结果与患者和治疗特征一起解释为治疗依从性的预测变量。
对每2周阶段的依从性,分为两类(依从者或不依从者)。依从者被定义为按照方案佩戴支具的患者。
在整个治疗过程中,依从性和疼痛程度降低,而膝关节总体评分提高。在探索性逻辑回归中,疼痛、患侧膝关节和支具活动范围设置是依从性的显著预测因素。
疼痛、患侧膝关节和支具活动范围设置是治疗前4周佩戴支具的主要预测因素。本研究首次深入了解了MCL支具佩戴的依从性,可能有助于临床医生进行治疗管理。