• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多重含义如何影响词汇学习和重新映射?

How do multiple meanings affect word learning and remapping?

作者信息

Simonetti Matilde E, Koch Iring, Roembke Tanja C

机构信息

Institute of Psychology, RWTH Aachen University, Jaegerstr. 17/19, 52066, Aachen, Germany.

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 2025 Mar 24. doi: 10.3758/s13421-025-01706-z.

DOI:10.3758/s13421-025-01706-z
PMID:40126863
Abstract

Many words have multiple meanings. It is currently unclear how a word with more than one meaning is acquired or stored long-term. One possibility is that each word's meaning is less robustly encoded; this, in turn, may make it easier to acquire additional meanings. We investigated this hypothesis across three cross-situational statistical learning experiments (N = 62 (in-lab), N = 61 (online), N = 60 (online)), using the same general procedure: During Learning Phase 1 (LP1), participants acquired both 1:1 (each word has one meaning) and 1:2 (each word has two meanings) mappings. In Learning Phase 2 (LP2), each word received one new meaning. Across experiments, we manipulated the frequency of 1:1 and 1:2 mappings. As expected, 1:2 mappings were always harder to acquire in LP1. However, in the LP2 of Experiment 1, former 1:1 mappings were remapped more easily than former 1:2 ones, while 1:2 mappings were remapped more easily in Experiments 2 and 3. These data suggest that words with multiple meanings are more easily remapped, indicating that each meaning is less robustly associated with the word, which in turn may facilitate the acquisition of an additional meaning. However, the observed inconsistencies in the remapping results between in-lab and online experiments suggest that CSWL may differ across these two settings.

摘要

许多单词有多种含义。目前尚不清楚一个具有多种含义的单词是如何被习得或长期存储的。一种可能性是每个单词的含义编码不够稳固;反过来,这可能会使获取额外含义变得更容易。我们通过三个跨情境统计学习实验(实验室实验N = 62,在线实验1 N = 61,在线实验2 N = 60)对这一假设进行了研究,采用相同的一般程序:在学习阶段1(LP1),参与者学习1:1(每个单词有一个含义)和1:2(每个单词有两个含义)的映射关系。在学习阶段2(LP2),每个单词被赋予一个新含义。在所有实验中,我们操纵了1:1和1:2映射关系的频率。正如预期的那样,在LP1中,1:2的映射关系总是更难习得。然而,在实验1的LP2中,先前的1:1映射关系比先前的1:2映射关系更容易重新映射,而在实验2和3中,1:2映射关系更容易重新映射。这些数据表明,具有多种含义的单词更容易重新映射,这表明每个含义与该单词的关联不够稳固,这反过来可能有助于获取额外的含义。然而,在实验室实验和在线实验之间观察到的重新映射结果的不一致表明,跨情境统计学习在这两种设置下可能会有所不同。

相似文献

1
How do multiple meanings affect word learning and remapping?多重含义如何影响词汇学习和重新映射?
Mem Cognit. 2025 Mar 24. doi: 10.3758/s13421-025-01706-z.
2
The role of partial knowledge in statistical word learning.部分知识在统计单词学习中的作用。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2014 Feb;21(1):1-22. doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0443-y.
3
Learning new meanings for known words: Perturbation of original meanings and retention of new meanings.学习已知单词的新含义:原有含义的扰动与新含义的保留。
Mem Cognit. 2019 Jan;47(1):130-144. doi: 10.3758/s13421-018-0855-z.
4
Acquisition of novel word meaning via cross situational word learning: An event-related potential study.通过跨情境词汇学习获取新词义:一项事件相关电位研究。
Brain Lang. 2022 Jun;229:105111. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2022.105111. Epub 2022 Mar 31.
5
Learning new words through reading: do robust spelling-sound mappings boost learning of word forms and meanings?通过阅读学习新单词:稳固的拼写-发音映射关系能促进单词形式和含义的学习吗?
R Soc Open Sci. 2022 Dec 14;9(12):210555. doi: 10.1098/rsos.210555. eCollection 2022 Dec.
6
The role of reference in cross-situational word learning.参考在跨情境词汇学习中的作用。
Cognition. 2018 Jan;170:64-75. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.09.006. Epub 2017 Sep 22.
7
What have we learned from 15  years of research on cross-situational word learning? A focused review.从15年的跨情境词汇学习研究中我们学到了什么?一项重点综述。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jul 4;14:1175272. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1175272. eCollection 2023.
8
A joint model of word segmentation and meaning acquisition through cross-situational learning.一种通过跨情境学习实现分词与语义获取的联合模型。
Psychol Rev. 2015 Oct;122(4):792-829. doi: 10.1037/a0039702.
9
Strength of Temporal White Matter Pathways Predicts Semantic Learning.颞叶白质通路的强度可预测语义学习。
J Neurosci. 2017 Nov 15;37(46):11101-11113. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1720-17.2017. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
10
Stochastic dynamics of lexicon learning in an uncertain and nonuniform world.词汇学习在不确定和非均匀世界中的随机动力学。
Phys Rev Lett. 2013 Jun 21;110(25):258701. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.258701.

本文引用的文献

1
Processing of Synonyms and Homographs in Bilingual and Monolingual Speakers.双语和单语使用者对同义词和同形异义词的处理
J Cogn. 2024 Jan 9;7(1):4. doi: 10.5334/joc.329. eCollection 2024.
2
Does bilingual experience influence statistical language learning?双语经验是否会影响统计语言学习?
Cognition. 2024 Jan;242:105639. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105639. Epub 2023 Oct 17.
3
Statistical learning and children's emergent literacy in rural Côte d'Ivoire.统计学习与科特迪瓦农村儿童初期读写能力
Dev Sci. 2024 Sep;27(5):e13448. doi: 10.1111/desc.13448. Epub 2023 Sep 24.
4
How do Autistic and Neurotypical Children's Interests Influence their Accuracy During Novel Word Learning?自闭症和神经典型儿童的兴趣如何影响他们在学习新单词时的准确性?
J Autism Dev Disord. 2024 Sep;54(9):3301-3315. doi: 10.1007/s10803-023-06066-8. Epub 2023 Aug 2.
5
The effects of bilingualism on children's cross-situational word learning under different variability conditions.双语对不同变异性条件下儿童跨情境词汇学习的影响。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2023 May;229:105621. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2022.105621. Epub 2023 Jan 21.
6
Word-Object Learning via Visual Exploration in Space (WOLVES): A neural process model of cross-situational word learning.基于空间视觉探索的词汇-对象学习(WOLVES):一种跨情境词汇学习的神经过程模型。
Psychol Rev. 2022 Jul;129(4):640-695. doi: 10.1037/rev0000313. Epub 2021 Aug 26.
7
Estimating power in (generalized) linear mixed models: An open introduction and tutorial in R.在(广义)线性混合模型中估计功效:在 R 中的开放介绍和教程。
Behav Res Methods. 2021 Dec;53(6):2528-2543. doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01546-0. Epub 2021 May 5.
8
Explicit and implicit memory representations in cross-situational word learning.跨情境词汇学习中的内隐和外显记忆表征。
Cognition. 2020 Dec;205:104444. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104444. Epub 2020 Oct 16.
9
Challenges and Opportunities for Human Behavior Research in the Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Pandemic.新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)大流行期间人类行为研究面临的挑战与机遇
Front Psychol. 2020 Jul 10;11:1786. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01786. eCollection 2020.
10
Language Experience Shapes the Development of the Mutual Exclusivity Bias.语言经验塑造了互斥性偏差的发展。
Infancy. 2010 Mar;15(2):125-150. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-7078.2009.00009.x. Epub 2010 Jan 8.