Ahmed Naseer, Abbasi Maria Shakoor, Salahuddin Asra, Tariq Lareb, Siraj Sarrah, Das Gotam, Suleman Ghazala, Vohra Fahim, Heboyan Artak
Department of Prosthodontics, Altamash Institute of Dental Medicine, Karachi, Pakistan.
Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Medical University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2025 Feb;11(1):e70118. doi: 10.1002/cre2.70118.
The aim of this study was to compare the retentive strengths of various forms of denture adhesives (paste, powder, and strips) on different types of mandibular residual alveolar ridges, considering their respective denture weights.
In this crossover randomized-controlled trial, the patients were randomly and equally divided into 3 groups based on clinical features and radiographic findings according to the Wical-Swoope classification. Three forms of denture adhesives were used, including powder, cream, and strips, for three residual ridge types. Quantification of retention without adhesive was carried out as a control. The retentive strength of adhesives was compared in each ridge pattern and correlated with the denture weight. The study was registered at https://clinicaltrials.gov (identifier number: NCT05063422).
The mean retentive strengths of dentures without adhesive (control) were relatively low across all ridge classifications, ranging from 0.27 to 0.69 lb. In contrast, the experimental groups utilizing Fittydent and Polygrip adhesive products showed significantly improved retentive strengths, with Fittydent cream and Polygrip cream showed the highest enhancement, ranging from 1.01 to 2.57 lb across different ridge types. Furthermore, significant mean differences were observed between ridge classes and the retentive strength of each adhesive product.
The study highlights the crucial role of tailored denture adhesive selection in optimizing retention for denture wearers. Polygrip cream demonstrated superior effectiveness across various ridge classifications compared to Fittydent cream, powder, and strips. These findings emphasize the importance of personalized treatment approaches based on ridge types and denture weight.
本研究的目的是比较不同形式的义齿粘合剂(糊剂、粉剂和条带)在不同类型的下颌残余牙槽嵴上的固位强度,并考虑其各自的义齿重量。
在这项交叉随机对照试验中,根据Wical-Swoope分类,根据临床特征和影像学检查结果将患者随机等分为3组。针对三种残余嵴类型使用了三种形式的义齿粘合剂,包括粉剂、乳膏和条带。作为对照,对无粘合剂时的固位情况进行了量化。比较了每种嵴型中粘合剂的固位强度,并将其与义齿重量相关联。该研究已在https://clinicaltrials.gov上注册(标识符编号:NCT05063422)。
在所有嵴分类中,无粘合剂(对照)的义齿平均固位强度相对较低,范围为0.27至0.69磅。相比之下,使用Fittydent和Polygrip粘合剂产品的实验组显示固位强度显著提高,其中Fittydent乳膏和Polygrip乳膏的增强效果最为显著,在不同嵴型中范围为1.01至2.57磅。此外,在嵴类与每种粘合剂产品的固位强度之间观察到显著的平均差异。
该研究强调了为义齿佩戴者优化固位而选择合适的义齿粘合剂的关键作用。与Fittydent乳膏、粉剂和条带相比,Polygrip乳膏在各种嵴分类中显示出更高的有效性。这些发现强调了基于嵴型和义齿重量的个性化治疗方法的重要性。