• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项系统评价和荟萃分析评估假牙黏附剂的疗效。

A systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of denture adhesives.

机构信息

Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Prince Philip Dental Hospital, 34 Hospital Road, Sai Ying Pun, Hong Kong, China.

Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Prince Philip Dental Hospital, 34 Hospital Road, Sai Ying Pun, Hong Kong, China.

出版信息

J Dent. 2021 May;108:103638. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103638. Epub 2021 Mar 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103638
PMID:33727079
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This systematic review aims to investigate the efficacy of denture adhesives (DAs) for complete dentures (CDs), and to provide clinical recommendations for prosthodontists and general practitioners.

DATA/SOURCES: Electronic databases (Medline, Embase, CENTRAL) and gray literatures were searched (up to March 2020) for relevant randomized and non-randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs and CCTs) evaluating the efficacy of DAs when applied to CDs. Primary outcomes were objectively assessed variables directly related to mastication (denture retention, maximum bite force and masticatory efficiency). Secondary outcomes included other objectively assessed variables and patient-reported outcomes.

STUDY SELECTION

Of the 1729 records identified, 39 studies (43 articles) were included in the analysis. Among them, 23 were RCTs and 16 were CCTs, with two multicenter clinical trials (1 RCT and 1 CCT). Meta-analysis results indicated that DAs provided significantly higher retention (SMD 1.34, 95 % CI: 0.89-1.79, P < 0.001) for CDs. Bite force (SMD 0.98, 95 % CI: 0.50-1.47, P < 0.001) and masticatory performance (SMD 0.72, 95 % CI: 0.23-1.22, P = 0.004) of the CD wearers were also improved after using DAs, but the effect size was relatively smaller.

CONCLUSION

Based on the results of this systematic review, it is concluded that DAs can improve denture retention, bite force and masticatory performance of CD wearers.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

This study investigated the effects of all types of DAs for CDs in terms of their effects on denture retention, masticatory performance, oral health-related quality of life and oral microorganisms for CD wearers.

摘要

目的

本系统评价旨在研究义齿黏附剂(DAs)对全口义齿(CDs)的疗效,并为修复医生和全科医生提供临床建议。

资料来源

电子数据库(Medline、Embase、CENTRAL)和灰色文献(截至 2020 年 3 月)中检索了评价 DAs 应用于 CDs 时疗效的随机和非随机对照临床试验(RCT 和 CCT)。主要结局是与咀嚼直接相关的客观评估变量(义齿固位、最大咬合力和咀嚼效率)。次要结局包括其他客观评估变量和患者报告结局。

研究选择

在确定的 1729 条记录中,有 39 项研究(43 篇文章)纳入分析。其中,23 项为 RCT,16 项为 CCT,有两项多中心临床试验(1 项 RCT 和 1 项 CCT)。Meta 分析结果表明,DAs 显著提高了 CDs 的固位(SMD 1.34,95%CI:0.89-1.79,P<0.001)。使用 DAs 后,CD 佩戴者的咬合力(SMD 0.98,95%CI:0.50-1.47,P<0.001)和咀嚼性能(SMD 0.72,95%CI:0.23-1.22,P=0.004)也得到改善,但效果较小。

结论

基于本系统评价的结果,得出结论认为 DAs 可以提高 CD 佩戴者的义齿固位、咬合力和咀嚼性能。

临床意义

本研究调查了所有类型的 DAs 对 CD 佩戴者的义齿固位、咀嚼性能、口腔健康相关生活质量和口腔微生物的影响。

相似文献

1
A systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of denture adhesives.一项系统评价和荟萃分析评估假牙黏附剂的疗效。
J Dent. 2021 May;108:103638. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103638. Epub 2021 Mar 13.
2
Influence of different presentations of denture adhesives on masticatory function of complete denture wearers: A systematic review and meta-analysis.不同剂型义齿黏附剂对全口义齿佩戴者咀嚼功能的影响:一项系统评价与Meta分析
J Prosthet Dent. 2023 Sep;130(3):351-361. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.09.026. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
3
Final-impression techniques and materials for making complete and removable partial dentures.制作全口义齿和可摘局部义齿的终印模技术及材料。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 4;4(4):CD012256. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012256.pub2.
4
Efficacy of denture adhesives in complete denture wearers compared to denture wearers not using denture adhesives. A systematic review.义齿黏附剂对全口义齿佩戴者的疗效与未使用义齿黏附剂的义齿佩戴者的比较。系统评价。
Spec Care Dentist. 2021 Mar;41(2):251-270. doi: 10.1111/scd.12562. Epub 2021 Jan 13.
5
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: denture chewing surface designs in edentulous people.缺失牙修复干预措施:无牙颌患者的义齿咀嚼面设计
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jan 25(1):CD004941. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004941.pub2.
6
Does the use of an adhesive improve conventional complete dentures? A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.使用黏附剂是否能改善传统全口义齿?一项随机对照试验的系统评价。
J Prosthet Dent. 2022 Aug;128(2):150-157. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.11.041. Epub 2021 Feb 5.
7
Aromatherapy for treatment of postoperative nausea and vomiting.芳香疗法治疗术后恶心和呕吐。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Mar 10;3(3):CD007598. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007598.pub3.
8
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.转移性皮肤黑色素瘤的全身治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2.
9
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
10
Saline irrigation for allergic rhinitis.用于变应性鼻炎的盐水冲洗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 22;6(6):CD012597. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012597.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
The Effect of Implant Distribution on Functional and Patient-Reported Outcomes of Mandibular Overdentures Retained by Four Mini Implants.种植体分布对四颗微型种植体固位的下颌覆盖义齿功能及患者报告结局的影响
J Oral Rehabil. 2025 Sep;52(9):1452-1460. doi: 10.1111/joor.14024. Epub 2025 May 9.
2
Comparative Analysis of Adhesive Retention and Denture Weight in Different Residual Ridge Morphologies: A Cross-Over Randomized-Controlled Trial.不同剩余牙槽嵴形态下黏附固位与义齿重量的对比分析:一项交叉随机对照试验
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2025 Feb;11(1):e70118. doi: 10.1002/cre2.70118.
3
Impact of the Physiological Parameters of the Oral Cavity on the Mechanical Properties of Zinc-stabilized and Zinc-free Adhesive Creams: A Comparative In Vitro Study.
口腔生理参数对含锌和不含锌黏附乳膏力学性能的影响:一项体外比较研究。
J Adhes Dent. 2025 Mar 10;27:21-29. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.c_1871.
4
Comparative effectiveness of types of denture adhesives in enhancing retention and function of complete dentures: a systematic review with network meta-analysis.不同类型义齿黏附剂增强全口义齿固位和功能效果的比较:系统评价与网络荟萃分析。
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Jan 6;28(1):78. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-05467-4.
5
The effect of using denture adhesives on patient satisfaction with complete dentures; a randomized clinical trial.使用义齿黏附剂对全口义齿患者满意度的影响:一项随机临床试验。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Dec 19;23(1):1027. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03757-7.
6
Dental Care for Older Adults.老年人的口腔护理。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 23;20(1):214. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010214.
7
Decision to use denture adhesive in complete denture wearers after one-month run-in period: A quasi-experimental study.全口义齿佩戴者在一个月适应期后使用义齿黏附剂的决策:一项准实验研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 1;17(12):e0276760. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276760. eCollection 2022.
8
Retention Capacity of Original Denture Adhesives and White Brands for Conventional Complete Dentures: An In Vitro Study.传统全口义齿原品牌和白色品牌义齿粘合剂的固位能力:一项体外研究。
Polymers (Basel). 2022 Apr 26;14(9):1749. doi: 10.3390/polym14091749.
9
Masticatory performance in patients undergoing free fibula flap for mandible reconstruction.游离腓骨瓣修复下颌骨重建术后患者的咀嚼效能。
BMC Oral Health. 2022 Mar 18;22(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02114-4.
10
Comparing Masticatory Performance of Maxillary Mini Dental Implant Overdentures, Complete Removable Dentures and Dentate Subjects.比较上颌微型种植牙覆盖义齿、全口可摘义齿和有牙颌受试者的咀嚼性能。
J Clin Med. 2021 Oct 27;10(21):5006. doi: 10.3390/jcm10215006.