The Procter & Gamble Company, Mason, Ohio, USA.
Oral Health Research Institute, Indiana University School of Dentistry, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
J Prosthodont. 2024 Apr;33(4):324-329. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13781. Epub 2023 Nov 4.
To compare the effects of two denture adhesive formulations on the bite force required to dislodge a maxillary denture in adult participants during a 13-h test period.
Twenty-two participants with a fair-to-poor fitting maxillary denture opposed by natural dentition or a stable mandibular denture were enrolled in this single-center, randomized, double-blind, two-treatment, 4-period crossover study. Participants were randomly assigned a product usage sequence so that each participant used each product twice during the 4-day test period. The test product was a denture cream adhesive formulated with an optimized calcium/zinc partial salt of polyvinyl methyl ether/maleic acid (Fixodent Ultra technology); the control product was a cream adhesive formulated with a calcium/zinc partial salt of polyvinyl methyl ether/maleic acid (Fixodent Original technology). On each study day, bite force at dislodgement was measured with a gnathodynamometer at baseline, representing the "no adhesive" score. Then, after standardized product application to the participant's existing maxillary denture by site staff, bite force measurements were retaken at 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, and 13 h. The change from baseline and the 13-h area under the bite-force-change-from-baseline curve were analyzed via an analysis of variance.
Twenty-one participants completed all test periods; one additional participant completed three test periods so 22 participants were included in the analysis. There were 15 females and 7 males with a mean age of 70 years. The mean 13-h area under the bite-force-change-from-baseline curve was 8% greater (p = 0.010) for the test adhesive (114.3 lb) than for the control adhesive (105.9 lb). Both adhesives showed a statistically significant increase in bite force (p < 0.001) at each time point compared to no adhesive.
The optimized calcium/zinc partial salt of polyvinyl methyl ether/maleic acid test adhesive provided superior maxillary denture retention relative to that of the control adhesive across 13 h. Both adhesives increased bite force at dislodgement compared to no adhesive.
比较两种义齿固位剂配方在 13 小时测试期内,对需要去除上颌义齿的成年人所需的咬合力的影响。
22 名上颌义齿佩戴者参加了这项单中心、随机、双盲、两治疗、四周期交叉研究,他们的上颌义齿适配度为一般到差,由天然牙或稳定的下颌义齿对抗。参与者被随机分配产品使用顺序,以便每个参与者在 4 天的测试期内使用每种产品两次。测试产品是一种含有优化的聚维酮甲基醚/马来酸钙/锌部分盐的义齿膏状黏附剂(Fixodent Ultra 技术);对照产品是一种含有聚维酮甲基醚/马来酸钙/锌部分盐的乳膏状黏附剂(Fixodent Original 技术)。在每个研究日,使用咀嚼力计在基线时测量脱位时的咬合力,作为“无黏附剂”评分。然后,在现场工作人员将标准化产品应用于参与者现有的上颌义齿后,在 1、3、5、7、9、11 和 13 小时再次测量咬合力。通过方差分析分析了从基线的变化和从基线的咬合力变化的 13 小时下面积。
21 名参与者完成了所有测试期;另有 1 名参与者完成了 3 个测试期,因此共有 22 名参与者纳入分析。参与者中有 15 名女性和 7 名男性,平均年龄为 70 岁。测试黏附剂的 13 小时下咬合力变化的平均面积比对照黏附剂(114.3 磅)大 8%(p = 0.010),为 105.9 磅。与无黏附剂相比,两种黏附剂在每个时间点的咬合力均显著增加(p < 0.001)。
与对照黏附剂相比,优化的聚维酮甲基醚/马来酸钙/锌部分盐测试黏附剂在 13 小时内提供了更好的上颌义齿固位效果。与无黏附剂相比,两种黏附剂在脱位时都增加了咬合力。