Suppr超能文献

黄激光与冷冻疗法治疗卡波西肉瘤皮肤病变的疗效:一项对比研究。

Efficacy of pro-yellow laser versus cryotherapy in treating cutaneous lesions of Kaposi's sarcoma: a comparative study.

作者信息

İlchan Selin, Bayramgürler Dilek, Demirbaş Abdullah, Demirsoy Evren Odyakmaz, Aktürk Aysun Şikar, Kıran Rebiay, Sayman Nilgün

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, Department of Dermatology, Kocaeli University, Kocaeli, Turkey.

出版信息

Arch Dermatol Res. 2025 Mar 24;317(1):627. doi: 10.1007/s00403-025-04154-6.

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of Pro-Yellow Laser (PYL) in treating plaque and patch lesions of classical Kaposi's Sarcoma (KS) and compare its outcomes with cryotherapy (CT). A single-blind, randomized, comparative experimental study was conducted on nine HIV-negative classical KS patients at Kocaeli University Dermatology Outpatient Clinic between April 2022 and April 2023. Each patient received both CT and PYL treatments on separate lesions. Lesions were scored based on surface area and depth before and after treatment, and percentage change (PC) was calculated. A total of 41 lesions were treated (16 with CT and 25 with PYL). CT achieved 100% median PC, while PYL showed a median PC of 42.58% (p = 0.008). No significant difference was observed between CT and PYL in macule/patch lesions (DS-1, p = 0.192), but CT was significantly more effective for papule/plaque lesions (DS-2, p = 0.048). CT caused minor side effects such as blistering and delayed healing, while PYL was well-tolerated with no adverse events. PYL demonstrated comparable efficacy to CT for early-stage KS lesions with fewer complications, making it a promising alternative for patients unable to tolerate CT. However, CT remains more effective for advanced lesions. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings in larger cohorts.

摘要

本研究旨在评估普罗黄激光(PYL)治疗经典型卡波西肉瘤(KS)斑块和斑片损害的疗效,并将其结果与冷冻疗法(CT)进行比较。2022年4月至2023年4月期间,在科贾埃利大学皮肤科门诊对9例HIV阴性的经典型KS患者进行了一项单盲、随机、对照实验研究。每位患者的不同损害分别接受CT和PYL治疗。根据治疗前后的表面积和深度对损害进行评分,并计算变化百分比(PC)。总共治疗了41处损害(16处接受CT治疗,25处接受PYL治疗)。CT的PC中位数达到100%,而PYL的PC中位数为42.58%(p = 0.008)。在斑疹/斑片损害方面(DS-1,p = 0.192),CT和PYL之间未观察到显著差异,但在丘疹/斑块损害方面(DS-2,p = 0.048),CT明显更有效。CT引起了水疱形成和愈合延迟等轻微副作用,而PYL耐受性良好,未出现不良事件。对于早期KS损害,PYL显示出与CT相当的疗效,且并发症较少,这使其成为无法耐受CT的患者的一种有前景的替代方法。然而,CT对晚期损害仍然更有效。需要进一步的研究在更大的队列中证实这些发现。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验