Zhou Wangji, Li Yixuan, Zheng Haixia, He Miao, Zhang Miaoyan, Chen Qiaoling, Situ Christopher, Wang Yaqi, Zhang Ting, Chen Keqi, Dai Jinrong, Meng Shuzhen, Liu Xueqi, Wu Aohua, Liu Yaping, Xu Kai-Feng, Tian Xinlun, Zhang Xue
Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
State Key Laboratory of Common Mechanism Research of Major Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2025 Mar 24;20(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s13023-025-03661-z.
Hereditary bronchiectasis refers to a subset of bronchiectasis related to genetic mutations, presenting with common clinical features. Historically, diagnosing this condition has been difficult due to the inaccessibility of diagnostic services coupled with a lack of awareness of the syndrome. We hypothesize that whole exome sequencing (WES) in patients with supporting clinical features, combined with non-genetic testing methods, will enhance the diagnosis of hereditary bronchiectasis.
In total, 87 patients with clinical features suggestive of hereditary bronchiectasis, such as diffuse bronchiectasis (≥ 2 lobes) combined with early onset symptoms, recurrent otitis media, rhinosinusitis, infertility, organ laterality defects or a family history of bronchiectasis, were included in this study. Among them, 49.4% (43/87) were diagnosed with hereditary bronchiectasis, including 15 patients with cystic fibrosis, 27 patients with primary ciliary dyskinesia, and 1 patient with immunodeficiency-21. The combined use of WES and non-genetic testing methods significantly improved the diagnostic rate of hereditary bronchiectasis compared to non-genetic testing alone (47.1% vs. 25.3%, P = 0.005). Re-analysis of negative commercial genetic tests led to two additional diagnoses, though this increase was not statistically significant (47.1% vs. 49.4%, P = 0.879).
We have described the supporting clinical features of patients with hereditary bronchiectasis. Clinicians should recommend WES for patients exhibiting these characteristics, in combination with accessible non-genetic testing methods, to maximize diagnostic accuracy. For patients with negative initial genetic test results, re-analysis of WES data may facilitate obtaining a new diagnosis.
遗传性支气管扩张症是指与基因突变相关的支气管扩张症的一个子集,具有常见的临床特征。从历史上看,由于诊断服务难以获得以及对该综合征缺乏认识,诊断这种疾病一直很困难。我们假设,对具有支持性临床特征的患者进行全外显子组测序(WES),并结合非基因检测方法,将提高遗传性支气管扩张症的诊断率。
本研究共纳入87例具有遗传性支气管扩张症提示性临床特征的患者,如弥漫性支气管扩张(≥2个肺叶)合并早发症状、复发性中耳炎、鼻窦炎、不孕、器官位置异常或支气管扩张症家族史。其中,49.4%(43/87)被诊断为遗传性支气管扩张症,包括15例囊性纤维化患者、27例原发性纤毛运动障碍患者和1例免疫缺陷-21患者。与单独使用非基因检测方法相比,WES与非基因检测方法联合使用显著提高了遗传性支气管扩张症的诊断率(47.1%对25.3%,P = 0.005)。对阴性商业基因检测结果进行重新分析又得出了另外两个诊断结果,尽管这一增加在统计学上不显著(47.1%对49.4%,P = 0.879)。
我们描述了遗传性支气管扩张症患者的支持性临床特征。临床医生应建议对表现出这些特征的患者进行WES检测,并结合可获得的非基因检测方法,以最大限度地提高诊断准确性。对于初始基因检测结果为阴性的患者,重新分析WES数据可能有助于获得新的诊断。