Menber Yonatan, Belachew Tefera, Fentahun Netsanet
Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, School of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Bahir Dar University, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia.
Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Public Health, Institute of Health, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia.
Front Nutr. 2025 Mar 10;12:1536386. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1536386. eCollection 2025.
Mid-Upper Arm Circumference (MUAC) or Weight-for-Length Z-Score (WHZ) are used to screen for acute malnutrition in children. The relative merits of MUAC and WHZ, as well as whether they ought to be used separately, are still up for debate. Considering the significant impact of acute malnutrition on a large number of children in Africa, along with the constraints on resources, it is crucial to critically assess the validity of simple and widely used tools utilized in both African communities and clinical settings. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the diagnostic test accuracy of MUAC in screening acute malnutrition among children aged 6-59 months in Africa.
A systematic review and meta-analysis study was conducted to pool evidence on the diagnostic performance of MUAC compared to WHZ among children aged 6 to 59 months across various studies in Africa. The StataMP 17.0 software was utilized for analysis, employing a Bivariate Random-effects Meta-Analysis model. Sensitivity, specificity, the Diagnostic Odds Ratio, and the Area Under the Curve were calculated. Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochrane's Q statistic and the I test. Additionally, meta-regression, subgroup analysis, sensitivity analysis, and assessments for publication bias were employed. The overall level of diagnostic test accuracy was estimated using a random-effects meta-analysis model.
Seventeen studies were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 38.1% (95% CI: 30.7, 46.1%) and 94.9% (95% CI: 93.2, 96.2%), respectively. The summary receiver operating characteristic curve plot showed that MUAC had good accuracy in detecting acute malnutrition (AUC = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.82, 0.88). The pooled level of diagnostic odds ratio was 13.22 (95% CI: 9.68, 16.77). The rate of misclassification in screening for acute malnutrition using MUAC was observed to be 11.7%.
The MUAC demonstrated low sensitivity but high specificity in diagnosing acute malnutrition in children aged 6 to 59 months across various regions of Africa. Furthermore, it was found that MUAC provides good diagnostic test accuracy when compared to WHZ. To enhance its accuracy, it is suggested to increase the MUAC cutoff thresholds.
上臂中部周长(MUAC)或身长别体重Z评分(WHZ)用于筛查儿童急性营养不良。MUAC和WHZ的相对优点,以及它们是否应单独使用,仍有待讨论。考虑到急性营养不良对非洲大量儿童的重大影响以及资源限制,至关重要的是要严格评估在非洲社区和临床环境中使用的简单且广泛应用的工具的有效性。因此,本研究旨在评估MUAC在筛查非洲6至59个月儿童急性营养不良中的诊断试验准确性。
进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析研究,以汇总非洲各项研究中6至59个月儿童中MUAC与WHZ相比的诊断性能证据。使用StataMP 17.0软件进行分析,采用双变量随机效应荟萃分析模型。计算敏感性、特异性、诊断比值比和曲线下面积。使用Cochrane的Q统计量和I²检验评估异质性。此外,还采用了荟萃回归、亚组分析、敏感性分析和发表偏倚评估。使用随机效应荟萃分析模型估计诊断试验准确性的总体水平。
荟萃分析纳入了17项研究。汇总的敏感性和特异性分别为38.1%(95%CI:30.7,46.1%)和94.9%(95%CI:93.2,96.2%)。汇总的受试者工作特征曲线显示,MUAC在检测急性营养不良方面具有良好的准确性(AUC = 0.85,95%CI:0.82,0.88)。汇总的诊断比值比水平为13.22(95%CI:9.68,16.77)。观察到使用MUAC筛查急性营养不良时的误诊率为11.7%。
在非洲不同地区,MUAC在诊断6至59个月儿童急性营养不良时显示出低敏感性但高特异性。此外,发现与WHZ相比,MUAC具有良好的诊断试验准确性。为提高其准确性,建议提高MUAC的截断阈值。