Arakawa Sayaka, Amano Koji, Koshimoto Saori, Okamura Satomi, Sakaguchi Tatsuma, Matsuda Yoshinobu, Tokoro Akihiro, Takeuchi Takashi, Mori Naoharu, Satomi Eriko
Department of Palliative Medicine, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Department of Supportive and Palliative Care, Osaka International Cancer Institute, 3-1-69 Otemae, Chuo-ku, Osaka, 541-8567, Japan.
Support Care Cancer. 2025 Sep 6;33(10):837. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09889-6.
There are no methods for assessing the need for multimodal care in cancer cachexia. We examined nine components in evaluating needs among advanced cancer patients.
This was a self-administered survey. Participants rated their nutrition impact symptoms (NISs) using a numerical rating scale, dietary intake using the Ingesta-Verbal/Visual Analogue Scale, and needs for nine components of multimodal care using a 7-point Likert scale. They completed the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Distress Thermometer, and Impact Thermometer questionnaires. They were divided into high- and low-need groups based on the median of the total scores for the nine components. We compared the groups and performed a multivariate logistic regression analysis to determine the association between need, NISs, dietary intake, and each scale.
Ultimately, 170 respondents were grouped into the high-need (n = 88) and low-need (n = 82) groups. There were no significant differences in their characteristics. The high-need group had significantly higher scores for NISs as well as higher HADS-Anxiety, Distress Thermometer, and Impact Thermometer scores. Four or more NISs with a score ≥ 4 (odds ratio (OR) 2.24, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.09-4.60), a HADS-Anxiety score ≥ 8 (OR 2.42, 95% CI 1.22-4.79), a Distress Thermometer score ≥ 4 (OR 6.10, 95% CI 2.36-15.76), and an Impact Thermometer score ≥ 3 (OR 3.87, 95% CI 1.57-9.50) were associated with a high need.
The nine components were associated with NISs, anxiety, and distress. They were useful in evaluating needs for multimodal care.
目前尚无评估癌症恶病质患者多模式护理需求的方法。我们在评估晚期癌症患者的需求时考察了九个方面。
这是一项自填式调查。参与者使用数字评分量表对其营养影响症状(NISs)进行评分,使用摄入-言语/视觉模拟量表对饮食摄入量进行评分,并使用7点李克特量表对多模式护理的九个方面的需求进行评分。他们完成了医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)、痛苦温度计和影响温度计问卷。根据九个方面总分的中位数将他们分为高需求组和低需求组。我们对两组进行了比较,并进行了多因素逻辑回归分析,以确定需求、NISs、饮食摄入量与各量表之间的关联。
最终,170名受访者被分为高需求组(n = 88)和低需求组(n = 82)。他们的特征没有显著差异。高需求组的NISs得分以及HADS焦虑、痛苦温度计和影响温度计得分显著更高。四个或更多NISs且得分≥4(比值比(OR)2.24,95%置信区间(CI)1.09 - 4.60)、HADS焦虑得分≥8(OR 2.42,95%CI 1.22 - 4.79)、痛苦温度计得分≥4(OR 6.10,95%CI 2.36 - 15.76)以及影响温度计得分≥3(OR 3.87,95%CI 1.57 - 9.50)与高需求相关。
这九个方面与NISs、焦虑和痛苦相关。它们有助于评估多模式护理的需求。