Rea Mariangela, Lisa Luana Di, Pagnotta Giorgia, Gallo Nunzia, Salvatore Luca, D'Amico Federica, Campilio Noelia, Baena José Manuel, Marchal Juan Antonio, Cicero Arrigo F G, Borghi Claudio, Focarete Maria Letizia
Department of Chemistry 'Giacomo Ciamician' and INSTM UdR of Bologna, University of Bologna, 40129 Bologna, Italy.
Department of Engineering for Innovation, University of Salento, 73100 Lecce, Italy.
ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2025 Apr 14;11(4):2456-2467. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.5c00034. Epub 2025 Mar 25.
Collagen and gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) are widely studied biomaterials for extrusion-based bioprinting (EBB) due to their excellent biological properties and ability to mimic the extracellular matrix of native tissues. This study aims to establish a preliminary workflow for approaching EBB by assessing collagen and GelMA printability and biological performance. GelMA was selected for its cost-effectiveness and ease of synthesis, while our collagen formulation was specifically optimized for printability, which is a challenging aspect of bioprinting. A parallel evaluation of their printability and biological performance is provided to develop a preliminary 3D intestinal model replicating the submucosa, lamina propria, and epithelial layer. Rheological analyses demonstrated that both materials exhibit a shear-thinning behavior. Collagen (u-CI) displayed a shear-thinning parameter = 0.1 and a consistency index = 80.62 Pa·s, while GelMA (u-GI) exhibited a more pronounced shear-thinning effect and enhanced shape retention ( = 0.06, = 286.6 Pa·s). Post-extrusion recovery was higher for collagen (85%), compared to GelMA (45%), indicating its greater mechanical resilience. Photo-crosslinking improved hydrogel stability, with an increase in storage modulus ' for both materials. Printing tests confirmed the suitability of both hydrogels for bioprinting, with GelMA demonstrating higher print fidelity than collagen. Dimensional stability assessments under incubating conditions revealed that collagen constructs maintained their shape for 14 days before degradation, whereas GelMA constructs exhibited a gradual decrease in diameter over 21 days. Cell culture studies showed that human skin fibroblasts (HSFs) and human colon adenocarcinoma cells (HCT-8) could be successfully cocultured in an optimized RPMI 1640-based medium. AlamarBlue assays and Live/Dead staining confirmed high cell viability and proliferation within both hydrogel matrices. Notably, HSFs in GelMA exhibited more elongated morphologies, likely due to the material's lower stiffness (380 Pa) compared to collagen (585 Pa). HCT-8 cells adhered more rapidly to GelMA constructs, forming colonies within 7 days, whereas on collagen, colony formation was delayed to 14 days. Finally, a layered intestinal model was fabricated, and immunostaining confirmed the expression of tight junction (ZO-1) and adhesion (E-cadherin) proteins, validating the epithelial monolayer integrity. These findings highlight the potential of collagen and GelMA in 3D bioprinting applications for gut tissue engineering and pave the way for future developments of intestinal models.
胶原蛋白和甲基丙烯酰化明胶(GelMA)因其优异的生物学特性以及模拟天然组织细胞外基质的能力,成为基于挤出式生物打印(EBB)的广泛研究的生物材料。本研究旨在通过评估胶原蛋白和GelMA的可打印性和生物学性能,建立一个用于EBB的初步工作流程。选择GelMA是因其成本效益高且易于合成,而我们的胶原蛋白配方则针对可打印性进行了专门优化,可打印性是生物打印中一个具有挑战性的方面。对它们的可打印性和生物学性能进行了平行评估,以开发一个初步的三维肠道模型,该模型可复制黏膜下层、固有层和上皮层。流变学分析表明,两种材料均表现出剪切变稀行为。胶原蛋白(u-CI)的剪切变稀参数 = 0.1,稠度指数 = 80.62 Pa·s,而GelMA(u-GI)表现出更明显的剪切变稀效应和更好的形状保持性( = 0.06, = 286.6 Pa·s)。与GelMA(45%)相比,胶原蛋白的挤出后恢复率更高(85%),表明其具有更大的机械弹性。光交联提高了水凝胶的稳定性,两种材料的储能模量'均增加。打印测试证实了两种水凝胶均适用于生物打印,GelMA的打印保真度高于胶原蛋白。在培养条件下的尺寸稳定性评估表明,胶原蛋白构建体在降解前可保持其形状14天,而GelMA构建体在21天内直径逐渐减小。细胞培养研究表明,人皮肤成纤维细胞(HSFs)和人结肠腺癌细胞(HCT-8)可以在优化的基于RPMI 1640的培养基中成功共培养。AlamarBlue检测和活/死染色证实了两种水凝胶基质中细胞的高活力和增殖。值得注意的是,GelMA中的HSFs表现出更细长的形态,这可能是由于该材料的硬度(380 Pa)低于胶原蛋白(585 Pa)。HCT-8细胞更快地粘附在GelMA构建体上,在7天内形成菌落,而在胶原蛋白上,菌落形成延迟至14天。最后,构建了一个分层肠道模型,免疫染色证实了紧密连接(ZO-1)和粘附(E-钙粘蛋白)蛋白的表达,验证了上皮单层的完整性。这些发现突出了胶原蛋白和GelMA在肠道组织工程的三维生物打印应用中的潜力,并为肠道模型的未来发展铺平了道路。