Yamada Takayuki, Ishibashi Katsuhiko, Sakaguchi Yuichi, Kawakami Sadatoshi, Nozaki-Taguchi Natsuko, Sato Yasunori, Isono Shiroh
Department of Anesthesiology, Pain and Palliative Care Medicine, Chiba University Hospital, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo-Ku, Chiba, 260-8670, Japan.
Department of Anesthesiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
J Anesth. 2025 Jun;39(3):445-455. doi: 10.1007/s00540-025-03487-w. Epub 2025 Mar 25.
Cuff-leak volume (CLV) tests are recommended to avoid extubation failure. We developed a novel cuff-leak pressure (CLP) test that quantitatively assesses upper airway resistance outside the tracheal tube. We hypothesized that CLP (airway pressure during apnea with the cuff deflated under a 6 l/minute oxygen flow) would increase after surgery (primary outcome) and evaluated the accuracy and reproducibility of CLP measurements by measuring the CLV (difference in expiratory tidal volume before and after deflation of a tracheal tube cuff).
CLV and CLP were measured before and after abdominal surgery (n = 25; abdominal group) and cervical spine surgery (n = 25; spine group) under general anesthesia and complete neuromuscular blockade.
In both groups, the CLP was significantly higher after surgery (median [25%, 75% interquartile ranges]) (abdominal group: 4.0 [1.0, 8.4] cmHO to 9.0 [3.4, 13.7] cmHO, P = 0.007; spine group: 8.0 [3.0, 10.9] cmHO to 11.0 [7.5, 13.5] cmHO, P = 0.038). The cutoff values for 100% negative and positive predictive values for a positive CLV test (CLV < 110 ml or 25% of the tidal volume with the cuff inflated) were 12.0 and 17.3 cmHO, respectively, with an AUC of 0.957 (95%CI 0.27-1.20). The CLP and CLV measurements were highly reproducible, as the Kendall's coefficients of concordance were 0.898 (1st and 3rd) and 0.971 (6 consecutive breaths), respectively, although the CLV progressively increased by 29.0 [1.8, 58.8] ml for the 6 consecutive breaths (P < 0.001).
Both the CLP and CLV measurements were accurate and highly reproducible to assess postoperative increase of the upper airway resistance before extubation.
推荐进行套囊漏气量(CLV)测试以避免拔管失败。我们开发了一种新型套囊漏气压力(CLP)测试,可定量评估气管导管外的上气道阻力。我们假设CLP(在6升/分钟氧气流量下套囊放气时的呼吸暂停期间的气道压力)在手术后会升高(主要结果),并通过测量CLV(气管导管套囊放气前后呼气潮气量的差值)评估CLP测量的准确性和可重复性。
在全身麻醉和完全神经肌肉阻滞下,对25例腹部手术患者(腹部组)和25例颈椎手术患者(脊柱组)在手术前后测量CLV和CLP。
两组患者术后CLP均显著升高(中位数[25%,75%四分位数间距])(腹部组:从4.0[1.0,8.4]厘米水柱升至9.0[3.4,13.7]厘米水柱,P = 0.007;脊柱组:从8.0[3.0,10.9]厘米水柱升至11.0[7.5,13.5]厘米水柱,P = 0.038)。套囊漏气量测试阳性(CLV < 110毫升或套囊充气时潮气量的25%)的100%阴性和阳性预测值的临界值分别为12.0和17.3厘米水柱,曲线下面积为0.957(95%可信区间0.27 - 1.20)。CLP和CLV测量具有高度可重复性,肯德尔和谐系数分别为0.898(第1次和第3次)和0.971(连续6次呼吸),尽管连续6次呼吸时CLV逐渐增加29.0[1.8,58.8]毫升(P < 0.001)。
CLP和CLV测量在评估拔管前术后上气道阻力增加方面均准确且高度可重复。