• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估女性对乳腺癌筛查的偏好及支付意愿:一种离散选择实验方法。

Assessing Women's Preference and Willingness to Pay for Breast Cancer Screening: A Discrete Choice Experiment Approach.

作者信息

Tahal Reyhane, Nahvijou Azin, Sari Ali Akbari, Daroudi Rajabali

机构信息

Department of Health Management, Policy and Economics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Cancer Research Center of Cancer Institute, Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Value Health Reg Issues. 2025 Jul;48:101110. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2025.101110. Epub 2025 Mar 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.vhri.2025.101110
PMID:40132432
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to explore women's preferences regarding breast cancer screening using a discrete choice experiment and willingness-to-pay analysis.

METHODS

A discrete-choice experiment was conducted among 255 women aged 40 to 65 years who were referred to health centers in Tehran city. The experiment included attributes such as screening methods (clinical examination and mammography), number of deaths prevented, possibility of misdiagnosis and unnecessary biopsy, screening intervals, and cost of the screening test. A conditional logit model was used to estimate preferences, and willingness-to-pay values were derived from the model coefficients.

RESULTS

Women revealed a strong preference for mammography over clinical examination(odds ratio [OR] 1.73; 95% CI 1.47-2.04; P < .001). Compared with 1 death prevented per 1000 women, the ORs for 3 and 6 deaths prevented per 1000 women were 18.1 (95% CI 12.72-25.75; P < .001) and 74.48 (95% CI 49.41-112.27; P < .001), respectively. The ORs for misdiagnosis and unnecessary biopsy rates of 10 of 100 people were 0.006 (95% CI 0.003-0.012; P < .001). Preferences for screening intervals varied, with a higher preference for screening every 4 years (OR 2.77; 95% CI 1.73-4.43; P < .001) compared with annual screening. The cost was also a significant factor, with a decrease in the odds of choosing a screening option as the cost increased (OR 0.139; 95% CI 0.1396-0.1399; P = .001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides valuable insights into women's preferences for breast cancer screening in Iran.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在使用离散选择实验和支付意愿分析来探索女性对乳腺癌筛查的偏好。

方法

对255名年龄在40至65岁之间、被转诊至德黑兰市健康中心的女性进行了离散选择实验。该实验包括筛查方法(临床检查和乳房X光检查)、预防死亡人数、误诊和不必要活检的可能性、筛查间隔以及筛查测试成本等属性。使用条件logit模型来估计偏好,并从模型系数中得出支付意愿值。

结果

与临床检查相比,女性对乳房X光检查表现出强烈偏好(优势比[OR]1.73;95%置信区间1.47 - 2.04;P <.001)。与每1000名女性预防1例死亡相比,每1000名女性预防3例和6例死亡的OR分别为18.1(95%置信区间12.72 - 25.75;P <.001)和74.48(95%置信区间49.41 - 112.27;P <.001)。每100人中误诊和不必要活检率为10时的OR为0.006(95%置信区间0.003 - 0.012;P <.001)。对筛查间隔的偏好各不相同,与每年筛查相比,每4年筛查一次的偏好更高(OR 2.77;95%置信区间1.73 - 4.43;P <.001)。成本也是一个重要因素,随着成本增加,选择筛查选项的几率降低(OR 0.139;95%置信区间0.1396 - 0.1399;P =.001)。

结论

本研究为伊朗女性对乳腺癌筛查的偏好提供了有价值的见解。

相似文献

1
Assessing Women's Preference and Willingness to Pay for Breast Cancer Screening: A Discrete Choice Experiment Approach.评估女性对乳腺癌筛查的偏好及支付意愿:一种离散选择实验方法。
Value Health Reg Issues. 2025 Jul;48:101110. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2025.101110. Epub 2025 Mar 24.
2
Women's Preferences and Willingness to Pay for AI Chatbots in Women's Health: Discrete Choice Experiment Study.女性健康领域中女性对人工智能聊天机器人的偏好及支付意愿:离散选择实验研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jun 10;27:e67303. doi: 10.2196/67303.
3
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of different surveillance mammography regimens after the treatment for primary breast cancer: systematic reviews registry database analyses and economic evaluation.不同原发性乳腺癌治疗后监测性乳房 X 光造影方案的临床效果和成本效益:系统评价注册库分析和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2011 Sep;15(34):v-vi, 1-322. doi: 10.3310/hta15340.
4
Mammography in combination with breast ultrasonography versus mammography for breast cancer screening in women at average risk.乳腺 X 线摄影联合乳腺超声与乳腺 X 线摄影用于一般风险女性乳腺癌筛查。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 31;3(3):CD009632. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009632.pub3.
5
Screening for breast cancer: a systematic review update to inform the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care guideline.乳腺癌筛查:为为加拿大预防性医疗保健指南提供信息而进行的系统评价更新
Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 19;13(1):304. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02700-3.
6
Prevalence of and reasons for women's, family members', and health professionals' preferences for cesarean section in Iran: a mixed-methods systematic review.伊朗妇女、家庭成员和卫生专业人员选择剖宫产的流行情况及原因:一项混合方法系统评价。
Reprod Health. 2021 Jan 2;18(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12978-020-01047-x.
7
Stated Preference for Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review of the Literature, 1990-2013.癌症筛查的陈述性偏好:1990 - 2013年文献的系统综述
Prev Chronic Dis. 2016 Feb 25;13:E27. doi: 10.5888/pcd13.150433.
8
The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of carmustine implants and temozolomide for the treatment of newly diagnosed high-grade glioma: a systematic review and economic evaluation.卡莫司汀植入剂与替莫唑胺治疗新诊断的高级别胶质瘤的有效性和成本效益:一项系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Nov;11(45):iii-iv, ix-221. doi: 10.3310/hta11450.
9
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Mammography-Based Breast Cancer Screening in Indonesia.
Value Health Reg Issues. 2025 Jul;48:101112. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2025.101112. Epub 2025 Apr 2.
10
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.