Karthikeyan Suseeladevi Arun, Denholm Rachel, Babu-Narayan Sonya V, Sinha Shubhra, Stoica Serban, Dong Tim, Angelini Gianni D, Sudlow Cathie L M, Walker Venexia, Brown Kate, Caputo Massimo, Lawlor Debbie A
Population Health Science, University of Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK.
MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol Faculty of Health Sciences, Bristol, UK.
Open Heart. 2025 Mar 25;12(1):e003054. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2024-003054.
The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated major reallocation of healthcare services. Our aim was to assess the impact on paediatric congenital heart disease (CHD) procedures during different pandemic periods compared with the prepandemic period, to inform appropriate responses to future major health services disruptions.
We analysed 26 270 procedures from 17 860 children between 1 January 2018 and 31 March 2022 in England, linking them to primary/secondary care data. The study period included prepandemic and pandemic phases, with the latter including three restriction periods and corresponding relaxation periods. We compared procedure characteristics and outcomes between each pandemic period and the prepandemic period. There was a reduction in all procedures across all pandemic periods, with the largest reductions during the first, most severe restriction period (23 March 2020 to 23 June 2020), and the relaxation period following second restrictions (3 December 2020 to 4 January 2021) coinciding with winter pressures. During the first restrictions, median procedures per week dropped by 51 compared with the prepandemic period (80 vs 131 per week, p=4.98×10). Elective procedures drove these reductions, falling from 96 to 44 per week (p=1.89×10), while urgent (28 vs 27 per week, p=0.649) and life-saving/emergency procedures (7 vs 6 per week, p=0.198) remained unchanged. Cardiac surgery rates increased, and catheter-based procedure rates reduced during the pandemic. Procedures for children under 1 year were prioritised, especially during the first four pandemic periods. No evidence was found for differences in postprocedure complications (age-adjusted OR 1.1 (95% CI 0.9, 1.4)) or postprocedure mortality (age and case mix adjusted OR 0.9 (95% CI 0.6, 1.3)).
Prioritisation of urgent, emergency and life-saving procedures during the pandemic, particularly in infants, did not impact paediatric CHD postprocedure complications or mortality. This information is valuable for future major health services disruptions, though longer-term follow-up of the effects of delaying elective surgery is needed.
新冠疫情使得医疗服务需要进行重大重新分配。我们的目的是评估在不同疫情时期与疫情前时期相比,对小儿先天性心脏病(CHD)手术的影响,以便为未来应对重大卫生服务中断提供适当的应对措施。
我们分析了2018年1月1日至2022年3月31日期间英格兰17860名儿童的26270例手术,并将其与初级/二级医疗数据相关联。研究期间包括疫情前和疫情阶段,后者包括三个限制期和相应的放宽期。我们比较了每个疫情时期与疫情前时期的手术特征和结果。在所有疫情时期,所有手术数量均有所减少,在第一个最严格的限制期(2020年3月23日至2020年6月23日)减少幅度最大,第二次限制后的放宽期(2020年12月3日至2021年1月4日)恰逢冬季压力期,手术数量也减少。在第一次限制期间,每周的手术中位数与疫情前时期相比下降了51例(每周80例对131例,p = 4.98×10)。择期手术导致了这些减少,从每周96例降至44例(p = 1.89×10),而急诊手术(每周28例对27例,p = 0.649)和挽救生命/紧急手术(每周7例对6例,p = 0.198)保持不变。在疫情期间,心脏手术率上升,而基于导管的手术率下降。1岁以下儿童的手术得到优先安排,尤其是在疫情的前四个时期。未发现术后并发症(年龄调整后的比值比为1.1(95%置信区间为0.9,1.4))或术后死亡率(年龄和病例组合调整后的比值比为0.9(95%置信区间为0.6,1.3))存在差异的证据。
疫情期间,尤其是对婴儿而言,优先安排急诊、紧急和挽救生命的手术,并未影响小儿先天性心脏病手术后的并发症或死亡率。这些信息对于未来重大卫生服务中断具有重要价值,不过需要对延迟择期手术的影响进行长期随访。