Suppr超能文献

儿童单纯性阑尾炎的非手术治疗,为何不可以?一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。

Non-operative management of uncomplicated appendicitis in children, why not? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

作者信息

Brucchi Francesco, Filisetti Claudia, Luconi Ester, Fugazzola Paola, Cattaneo Dario, Ansaloni Luca, Zuccotti Gianvincenzo, Ferraro Simona, Danelli Piergiorgio, Pelizzo Gloria

机构信息

University of Milan, Via Festa Del Perdono 7, 20122, Milan, Italy.

Pediatric Surgery Department, Buzzi Children's Hospital, 20154, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

World J Emerg Surg. 2025 Mar 25;20(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s13017-025-00584-9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aims to provide a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing non-operative management (NOM) and operative management (OM) in a pediatric population with uncomplicated acute appendicitis.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), and Meta-analyses of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) guidelines. A comprehensive search was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL from inception to June 2024. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included, excluding studies involving adult patients and/or participants with complicated appendicitis. The variables considered were treatment complications, treatment efficacy during index admission and one-year follow-up, length of hospital stay (LOS), quality of life, and presence of appendicoliths.

RESULTS

Three RCTs involving 269 participants (134 antibiotics/135 appendectomy) were included. There was no statistically significant difference between the two treatments in terms of complication risk (combined RD = - 0.03; 95% CI - 0.11; 0.06, p = 0.54), even including complications related to NOM failure. The risk of complication-free treatment success rate in the antibiotic group is lower than in the surgery group (combined RD = - 0.05; 95% CI - 0.13; - 0.04; p = 0.29). In patients without appendicolith, the combined risk difference of treatment success between NOM and OM was not statistically significant - 0.01 (IC - 0.17; 0.16; p value: 0.93). There is no statistical difference in terms of efficacy at 1 year, between NOM and OM (combined RD = - 0.06; 95% CI - 0.21; 0.09), p = 0.44). The LOS in the NOM group is significantly longer than in the OM group (difference of median = - 19.90 h; 95% CI - 29.27; - 10.53, p < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review and meta-analysis provide evidence that NOM is safe and feasible for children with uncomplicated appendicitis and, in the group of patients without appendicolith, it is associated with a similar success rate to OM. However, more high-quality studies with adequate power and construction are still needed.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在对比较非手术治疗(NOM)和手术治疗(OM)在单纯性急性阑尾炎儿童患者中的随机对照试验(RCT)进行荟萃分析。

方法

根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)以及流行病学观察性研究的荟萃分析(MOOSE)指南进行系统的文献综述。从创刊至2024年6月在MEDLINE、Embase和CENTRAL中进行了全面检索。仅纳入随机对照试验(RCT),排除涉及成年患者和/或复杂性阑尾炎参与者的研究。所考虑的变量包括治疗并发症、首次入院期间和一年随访期间的治疗效果、住院时间(LOS)、生活质量以及阑尾结石的存在情况。

结果

纳入了三项涉及269名参与者(134例使用抗生素/135例进行阑尾切除术)的RCT。两种治疗在并发症风险方面无统计学显著差异(合并风险差[RD]= -0.03;95%置信区间[-0.11;0.06],p = 0.54),甚至包括与非手术治疗失败相关的并发症。抗生素组无并发症治疗成功率低于手术组(合并RD = -0.05;95%置信区间[-0.13;-0.04];p = 0.29)。在无阑尾结石的患者中,非手术治疗和手术治疗之间治疗成功的合并风险差异无统计学意义 -0.01(置信区间[-0.17;0.16];p值:0.93)。非手术治疗和手术治疗在1年疗效方面无统计学差异(合并RD = -0.06;95%置信区间[-0.21;0.09],p = 0.44)。非手术治疗组的住院时间明显长于手术治疗组(中位数差异 = -19.90小时;95%置信区间[-29.27;-10.53],p < 0.0001)。

结论

本系统评价和荟萃分析提供的证据表明,非手术治疗对于单纯性阑尾炎儿童是安全可行的,并且在无阑尾结石的患者组中,其成功率与手术治疗相似。然而,仍需要更多具有足够效力和设计的高质量研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68c0/11934708/894d9e63d4d7/13017_2025_584_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验