Suppr超能文献

儿童急性单纯性阑尾炎抗生素治疗与阑尾切除术的比较:一项荟萃分析。

Comparison of Antibiotic Therapy and Appendectomy for Acute Uncomplicated Appendicitis in Children: A Meta-analysis.

作者信息

Huang Libin, Yin Yuan, Yang Lie, Wang Cun, Li Yuan, Zhou Zongguang

机构信息

Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital and State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China2Laboratory of Digestive Surgery, West China Hospital and State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital and State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

出版信息

JAMA Pediatr. 2017 May 1;171(5):426-434. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.0057.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Antibiotic therapy for acute uncomplicated appendicitis is effective in adult patients, but its application in pediatric patients remains controversial.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the safety and efficacy of antibiotic treatment vs appendectomy as the primary therapy for acute uncomplicated appendicitis in pediatric patients.

DATA SOURCES

The PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register for randomized clinical trials were searched through April 17, 2016. The search was limited to studies published in English. Search terms included appendicitis, antibiotics, appendectomy, randomized controlled trial, controlled clinical trial, randomized, placebo, drug therapy, randomly, and trial.

STUDY SELECTION

Randomized clinical trials and prospective clinical controlled trials comparing antibiotic therapy with appendectomy for acute uncomplicated appendicitis in pediatric patients (aged 5-18 years) were included in the meta-analysis. The outcomes included at least 2 of the following terms: success rate of antibiotic treatment and appendectomy, complications, readmissions, length of stay, total cost, and disability days.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Data were independently extracted by 2 reviewers. The quality of the included studies was examined in accordance with the Cochrane guidelines and the Newcastle-Ottawa criteria. Data were pooled using a logistic fixed-effects model, and the subgroup pooled risk ratio with or without appendicolith was estimated.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was the success rate of treatment. The hypothesis was formulated before data collection.

RESULTS

A total of 527 articles were screened. In 5 unique studies, 404 unique patients with uncomplicated appendicitis (aged 5-15 years) were enrolled. Nonoperative treatment was successful in 152 of 168 patients (90.5%), with a Mantel-Haenszel fixed-effects risk ratio of 8.92 (95% CI, 2.67-29.79; heterogeneity, P = .99; I2 = 0%). Subgroup analysis showed that the risk for treatment failure in patients with appendicolith increased, with a Mantel-Haenszel fixed-effects risk ratio of 10.43 (95% CI, 1.46-74.26; heterogeneity, P = .91; I2 = 0%).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This meta-analysis shows that antibiotics as the initial treatment for pediatric patients with uncomplicated appendicitis may be feasible and effective without increasing the risk for complications. However, the failure rate, mainly caused by the presence of appendicolith, is higher than for appendectomy. Surgery is preferably suggested for uncomplicated appendicitis with appendicolith.

摘要

重要性

抗生素疗法对成年急性单纯性阑尾炎患者有效,但其在儿科患者中的应用仍存在争议。

目的

比较抗生素治疗与阑尾切除术作为儿科急性单纯性阑尾炎主要治疗方法的安全性和有效性。

数据来源

检索了截至2016年4月17日的PubMed、MEDLINE、EMBASE和Cochrane图书馆数据库以及Cochrane对照试验注册库中的随机临床试验。检索限于以英文发表的研究。检索词包括阑尾炎、抗生素、阑尾切除术、随机对照试验、临床对照试验、随机、安慰剂、药物治疗、随机地和试验。

研究选择

纳入比较抗生素疗法与阑尾切除术治疗儿科(5 - 18岁)急性单纯性阑尾炎的随机临床试验和前瞻性临床对照试验进行荟萃分析。结局包括以下至少2项:抗生素治疗和阑尾切除术的成功率、并发症、再入院率、住院时间、总成本和残疾天数。

数据提取与合成

由2名审阅者独立提取数据。根据Cochrane指南和纽卡斯尔 - 渥太华标准检查纳入研究的质量。使用逻辑固定效应模型汇总数据,并估计有无阑尾粪石的亚组汇总风险比。

主要结局与衡量指标

主要结局是治疗成功率。在数据收集前制定假设。

结果

共筛选527篇文章。在5项独特研究中,纳入了404例单纯性阑尾炎(5 - 15岁)的独特患者。168例患者中有152例(90.5%)非手术治疗成功,Mantel - Haenszel固定效应风险比为8.92(95%CI,2.67 - 29.79;异质性,P = 0.99;I² = 0%)。亚组分析显示,有阑尾粪石患者治疗失败风险增加,Mantel - Haenszel固定效应风险比为10.43(95%CI,1.46 - 74.26;异质性,P = 0.91;I² = 0%)。

结论与意义

这项荟萃分析表明,抗生素作为儿科单纯性阑尾炎患者的初始治疗可能可行且有效,而不会增加并发症风险。然而,主要由阑尾粪石导致的失败率高于阑尾切除术。对于伴有阑尾粪石的单纯性阑尾炎,建议首选手术治疗。

相似文献

1
Comparison of Antibiotic Therapy and Appendectomy for Acute Uncomplicated Appendicitis in Children: A Meta-analysis.
JAMA Pediatr. 2017 May 1;171(5):426-434. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.0057.

引用本文的文献

2
Determining Surgeon's Accuracy in Predicting the Severity of Appendicitis in Children: A Comparison Between Clinical Diagnosis and Intraoperative Findings.
J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg. 2025 Jul-Aug;30(4):469-476. doi: 10.4103/jiaps.jiaps_248_24. Epub 2025 Jul 4.
9
Prevalence of psychosocial interventions for pediatric dog bite injury: Is the bark actually worse than the bite?
J Child Adolesc Trauma. 2024 Mar 12;17(4):1013-1018. doi: 10.1007/s40653-024-00619-4. eCollection 2024 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Diagnosis and management of acute appendicitis. EAES consensus development conference 2015.
Surg Endosc. 2016 Nov;30(11):4668-4690. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5245-7. Epub 2016 Sep 22.
2
High failure rate of nonoperative management of acute appendicitis with an appendicolith in children.
J Pediatr Surg. 2016 Jun;51(6):908-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.02.056. Epub 2016 Mar 2.
3
Meta-analysis of antibiotics versus appendicectomy for non-perforated acute appendicitis.
Br J Surg. 2016 May;103(6):656-667. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10147. Epub 2016 Mar 17.
5
Nonoperative treatment of acute appendicitis in children: A feasibility study.
J Pediatr Surg. 2016 Jan;51(1):111-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2015.10.024. Epub 2015 Oct 23.
6
Long-term outcomes of operative versus nonoperative treatment for uncomplicated appendicitis.
J Pediatr Surg. 2015 Nov;50(11):1893-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2015.07.008. Epub 2015 Jul 14.
9
Appendicitis in preschool aged children: Regression analysis of factors associated with perforation outcome.
J Pediatr Surg. 2015 Sep;50(9):1569-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2015.02.050. Epub 2015 Feb 20.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验