Meade Jessica, Martin John M, McKeown Adam, Turbill Christopher, Walker Melissa J, Boardman Wayne S J, Welbergen Justin A
Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, Richmond, NSW, 2753, Australia.
Ecological Consulting, Ecosure, Fortitude Valley, QLD, 4006, Australia.
Mov Ecol. 2025 Mar 25;13(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s40462-025-00532-x.
The ability to navigate is crucial to the survival of many flying animals. Though relatively much less is known about the navigational abilities of bats versus birds, recent progress has been made in understanding the navigational abilities of cave roosting bats, but little is known about those of arboreal roosting flying-foxes, despite their extreme mobility.
We use extremely high spatiotemporal resolution GPS tracking to examine the flight behaviour of 11 grey-headed flying-foxes (Pteropus poliocephalus) displaced 16.8 km from their roost. We examined flight metrics of the resulting high-resolution traces to understand whether the displaced animals were aware their location with respect to the roost of capture. We use 7 grey-headed flying-foxes tracked from the roost of capture-as part of a separate, concurrent study-to aid in this comparison.
Ten of 11 displaced individuals were detected at the roost of capture within four days of release, but all displaced individuals roosted for at least one night away from the roost of capture. Six individuals returned 'home' the next day, and four roosted away from 'home' for ≥ one further night. Prior to their return 'home', displaced individuals on average flew 2.7 times further and stopped 1.7 more times than reference individuals or displaced animals that had already returned 'home'. This indicates that displaced individuals expended more effort each night than non-displaced individuals. This suggests that these individuals were attempting to return 'home', rather than choosing not to return due to a lack of motivation to home. Flight segments of displaced individuals were higher, less straight, and less likely to be oriented. Flight segments that ended in a point that an individual had previously visited were faster, higher, and straighter than those not known to end in a point previously visited.
Our findings suggest that approximately half of the displaced animals were aware of where they were with respect to 'home' the night after release, whereas other individuals took at least a further night to orient themselves. While our results are consistent with previous work suggesting that non-echolocating bats may use a large-scale navigational map based on vision, sensory manipulations would be needed to confirm this.
导航能力对于许多飞行动物的生存至关重要。尽管相较于鸟类,蝙蝠的导航能力相对鲜为人知,但在理解穴居蝙蝠的导航能力方面最近已取得进展,然而对于树栖的狐蝠的导航能力却知之甚少,尽管它们具有极强的移动性。
我们使用极高时空分辨率的GPS追踪来研究11只灰头狐蝠(Pteropus poliocephalus)的飞行行为,这些狐蝠被从其栖息地转移了16.8公里。我们检查了所得高分辨率轨迹的飞行指标,以了解被转移的动物是否知晓它们相对于捕获栖息地位置。我们使用从捕获栖息地追踪的7只灰头狐蝠(作为一项单独的同期研究的一部分)来辅助进行此比较。
11只被转移个体中有10只在放归后的四天内在捕获栖息地被检测到,但所有被转移个体都至少在远离捕获栖息地的地方栖息了一晚。6只个体在第二天返回“家”,4只个体在“家”外又栖息了≥一晚。在返回“家”之前,被转移个体平均飞行距离是参考个体或已返回“家”的被转移动物的2.7倍,且停留次数多1.7次。这表明被转移个体每晚比未被转移个体消耗更多精力。这表明这些个体试图返回“家”,而不是由于缺乏归巢动力而选择不返回。被转移个体的飞行片段更高、更不直且定向性更差。以个体先前去过的点结束的飞行片段比那些未知以先前去过点结束的飞行片段更快、更高且更直。
我们的研究结果表明,大约一半的被转移动物在放归后的第二天晚上就知道它们相对于“家”的位置,而其他个体至少还需要一晚来确定自己的方向。虽然我们的结果与之前的研究一致,即非回声定位蝙蝠可能使用基于视觉的大规模导航地图,但需要进行感官操纵来证实这一点。