Chen Xi, Cao Jiale, Ma Zhongtao, Yu Jianghui, Zhu Ying, Xu Fangfu, Hu Qun, Liu Guodong, Li Guangyan, Wei Haiyan
Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology/Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Cultivation and Physiology, Agricultural College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China.
Jiangsu Co-Innovation Center for Modern Production Technology of Grain Crops, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China.
Front Plant Sci. 2025 Mar 11;16:1562708. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1562708. eCollection 2025.
This study aims to establish a scientific basis for improving rice quality by investigating the relationship between variations in eating and appearance quality and the starch and protein content in soft and non-soft rice varieties.
Two soft rice varieties, Nanjing 5718 and Nanjing 9108, were compared with two non-soft rice varieties, Huaidao 5 hao and Huajing 5 hao. The study focused on eating and appearance quality, starch and protein content, and how these factors varied between superior and inferior grains within each variety.
Compared to non-soft rice, soft rice has some disadvantages in appearance quality, which is characterized by high chalky grain rate and chalkiness degree, and large differences in appearance between superior and inferior grains. This is mainly due to the low proportion of high grain weight grains, low amylose content, abnormal development of starch structure, and large protein bodies with high globulin and glutenin content, which destroys the close accumulation of starch particles, resulting in increased light scattering, increased chalkiness, and reduced transparency. Although the appearance quality of soft rice is not outstanding, its eating quality is extremely excellent, which is embodied in good appearance, high viscosity, good balance, high taste value and low hardness. This superior performance may be due to the high proportion of amylopectin in soft rice, which helps to improve the overall taste. In contrast, the amylose content of non-soft rice is higher, which leads to the increase of rice hardness and the decrease of viscosity. In addition, the gelatinization property of soft rice starch is more favorable, which makes the starch dissolve more in the cooking process, so as to further improve its eating quality.
本研究旨在通过调查软米和非软米品种的食味与外观品质变化以及淀粉和蛋白质含量之间的关系,为改善稻米品质建立科学依据。
将两个软米品种南京5718和南京9108与两个非软米品种淮稻5号和华粳5号进行比较。该研究聚焦于食味与外观品质、淀粉和蛋白质含量,以及这些因素在每个品种的优、劣粒之间如何变化。
与非软米相比,软米在外观品质方面存在一些劣势,其特点是垩白粒率和垩白度高,优、劣粒之间外观差异大。这主要是由于粒重高的籽粒比例低、直链淀粉含量低、淀粉结构发育异常以及球蛋白和谷蛋白含量高的大蛋白体,破坏了淀粉颗粒的紧密堆积,导致光散射增加、垩白增加和透明度降低。虽然软米的外观品质不突出,但其食味品质极佳,体现在外观好、粘性高、平衡性好、食味值高和硬度低。这种优异表现可能是由于软米中支链淀粉比例高,有助于改善整体口感。相比之下,非软米的直链淀粉含量较高,导致米饭硬度增加和粘性降低。此外,软米淀粉的糊化特性更有利,使淀粉在蒸煮过程中溶解更多,从而进一步提高其食味品质。