Schleim Stephan
Theory and History of Psychology, Faculty of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Heymans Institute for Psychological Research, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Stephan Schleim Philosophy and Psychology, Amersfoort, Netherlands.
Front Psychol. 2025 Mar 11;16:1554014. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1554014. eCollection 2025.
Mindfulness, meditation and yoga are very popular today. A large number of studies and meta-analyses have investigated the effectiveness of such practices for health, wellness and fitness. Yoga itself has repeatedly been described a science or science-based practice since the 20th century. This perspective addresses the question of the extent to which Western psychology and science are compatible with yoga psychology. To do this, we will first narrow down the meaning of "yoga," namely on the basis of the classical , a text on yoga that is probably at least 1,600 years old. According to this system, yoga is a combination of ethical rules, postures, breathing exercises and meditative techniques. The emphasis here is on epistemology: Which sources are accepted for valid knowledge in this system? Ontology is then discussed in the broader context of Indian philosophy. In a further section, the conceptualization and localization of mental faculties is discussed. This perspective discusses assumptions from Indian schools of thought such as yoga, which seem difficult to reconcile with Western science. One way to resolve this conflict is to reinterpret the terms and statements of classical sources of Indian philosophy. While this would serve compatibility with science, it probably undermines the authenticity and inner core of the Indian philosophical systems addressed here.
正念、冥想和瑜伽如今非常流行。大量研究和荟萃分析探讨了这些练习对健康、幸福和健身的有效性。自20世纪以来,瑜伽本身就一再被描述为一门科学或基于科学的实践。这一观点探讨了西方心理学和科学与瑜伽心理学在多大程度上兼容的问题。为此,我们首先将缩小“瑜伽”的含义,即基于《瑜伽经》,这是一部关于瑜伽的文本,可能至少有1600年的历史。根据这个体系,瑜伽是道德准则、体式、呼吸练习和冥想技巧的结合。这里的重点是认识论:在这个体系中,哪些来源被接受为有效知识?然后在印度哲学的更广泛背景下讨论本体论。在另一部分中,讨论了心理官能的概念化和定位。这一观点讨论了来自印度思想流派(如瑜伽)的假设,这些假设似乎难以与西方科学相协调。解决这一冲突的一种方法是重新解释印度哲学经典来源的术语和陈述。虽然这将有助于与科学兼容,但它可能会破坏这里所讨论的印度哲学体系的真实性和核心内容。