• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

围手术期的无导线起搏

Leadless pacing in peri-procedural settings.

作者信息

El-Chami Mikhael F, Cunnane Ryan

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Section of Electrophysiology, Emory University School of Medicine, 550 Peachtree Street, NE Atlanta, GA 30308, USA.

Division of Cardiology, Section of Electrophysiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

出版信息

Eur Heart J Suppl. 2025 Mar 24;27(Suppl 2):ii21-ii25. doi: 10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suae093. eCollection 2025 Mar.

DOI:10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suae093
PMID:40135101
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11932075/
Abstract

Leadless pacemakers' (LPs) main advantage over the traditional transvenous permanent pacemakers (TV-PPMs) is the absence of leads and subcutaneous pocket. These intracardiac pacemakers have been shown in observational studies to reduce long-term complications as compared with TV-PPM mainly by reducing the need for re-intervention. Two major advantages of this technology are the lower rate of infection (absence of pocket and lower rate of bacterial seeding) and lead-related complications (dislodgment). Hence, these advantages are more accentuated after transcutaneous valve replacement or valve surgery and clinical situations where it is important to reduce systemic infections and endocarditis. In this review, we highlight the role of LP in patients after transcutaneous and surgical valve replacements.

摘要

无导线起搏器(LPs)相较于传统经静脉永久起搏器(TV-PPMs)的主要优势在于无需导线和皮下囊袋。观察性研究表明,与TV-PPM相比,这些心内起搏器主要通过减少再次干预的需求来降低长期并发症。这项技术的两大主要优势是感染率较低(无囊袋且细菌植入率较低)以及与导线相关的并发症(导线移位)。因此,在经皮瓣膜置换或瓣膜手术后以及在减少全身感染和心内膜炎至关重要的临床情况下,这些优势更为突出。在本综述中,我们重点介绍了无导线起搏器在经皮和外科瓣膜置换术后患者中的作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7733/11932075/0736d16a6987/suae093f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7733/11932075/3a9407b6ea42/suae093f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7733/11932075/264a614e0855/suae093f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7733/11932075/843582273a43/suae093f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7733/11932075/0736d16a6987/suae093f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7733/11932075/3a9407b6ea42/suae093f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7733/11932075/264a614e0855/suae093f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7733/11932075/843582273a43/suae093f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7733/11932075/0736d16a6987/suae093f4.jpg

相似文献

1
Leadless pacing in peri-procedural settings.围手术期的无导线起搏
Eur Heart J Suppl. 2025 Mar 24;27(Suppl 2):ii21-ii25. doi: 10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suae093. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
Pacing considerations in patients undergoing transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement: Insights from a tertiary care center.经导管三尖瓣置换术患者的起搏考量:来自三级医疗中心的见解
Heart Rhythm. 2025 Feb 20. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2025.02.004.
3
Comparison of Patient Outcomes Between Leadless vs Transvenous Pacemakers Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后无导线起搏器与经静脉起搏器患者结局的比较。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Aug 12;17(15):1779-1791. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2024.05.030. Epub 2024 Jul 17.
4
Leadless Cardiac Pacemakers: Current status of a modern approach in pacing.无导线心脏起搏器:起搏的现代方法的现状。
Hellenic J Cardiol. 2017 Nov-Dec;58(6):403-410. doi: 10.1016/j.hjc.2017.05.004. Epub 2017 May 18.
5
[Indications for leadless VVI and VDD pacing in clinical practice].[临床实践中无导线VVI和VDD起搏的适应证]
G Ital Cardiol (Rome). 2022 Jun;23(6):454-460. doi: 10.1714/3810.37942.
6
Outcomes of leadless pacemaker implantation after cardiac surgery and transcatheter structural valve interventions.心脏手术后及经导管结构性瓣膜介入治疗后无导线起搏器植入的结果。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2023 Nov;34(11):2216-2222. doi: 10.1111/jce.16074. Epub 2023 Sep 20.
7
Leadless pacemakers: A review of current data and future directions.无导线起搏器:当前数据与未来方向的综述。
Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2021 May-Jun;66:61-69. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2021.06.003.
8
Management and Outcomes of Transvenous Pacing Leads in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Replacement.行经导管三尖瓣置换术患者中心静脉起搏导线的管理和结局。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Sep 14;13(17):2012-2020. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.04.054. Epub 2020 Aug 12.
9
MICRA AV implantation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后的 MICRA AV 植入。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2024 Jun;63:31-35. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2024.01.005. Epub 2024 Jan 12.
10
Leadless Cardiac Pacemakers: The Next Evolution in Pacemaker Technology.无导线心脏起搏器:起搏器技术的下一次演进
R I Med J (2013). 2017 Nov 1;100(11):31-34.

本文引用的文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of Micra™ VR leadless pacemaker in patients with bradycardia and atrial fibrillation in Australia.Micra™ VR无导线起搏器在澳大利亚心动过缓和心房颤动患者中的成本效益
J Arrhythm. 2024 Sep 27;40(6):1481-1489. doi: 10.1002/joa3.13145. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Transcatheter Valve Replacement in Severe Tricuspid Regurgitation.严重三尖瓣反流的经导管瓣膜置换术
N Engl J Med. 2025 Jan 9;392(2):115-126. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2401918. Epub 2024 Oct 30.
3
Long-Term Results Following Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.
经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗低危重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者的长期结果:随机试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Cardiol. 2024 Nov 1;230:6-13. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.08.014. Epub 2024 Aug 22.
4
Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Intraoperative Leadless Pacemaker Implantation During Valve Surgery.心脏瓣膜手术中植入无导线起搏器的长期安全性和有效性。
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2024 Oct;10(10):2224-2233. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2024.06.018. Epub 2024 Aug 14.
5
Comparison of Patient Outcomes Between Leadless vs Transvenous Pacemakers Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后无导线起搏器与经静脉起搏器患者结局的比较。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Aug 12;17(15):1779-1791. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2024.05.030. Epub 2024 Jul 17.
6
Leadless pacemakers at 5-year follow-up: the Micra transcatheter pacing system post-approval registry.5 年随访的无导线起搏器:Micra 经导管起搏系统上市后注册研究。
Eur Heart J. 2024 Apr 7;45(14):1241-1251. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae101.
7
National Variability in Pacemaker Implantation Rate Following TAVR: Insights From the STS/ACC TVT Registry.经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)后起搏器植入率的国家差异:STS/ACC TVT 注册研究的见解。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Feb 12;17(3):391-401. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2023.12.005.
8
Outcomes of leadless pacemaker implantation after cardiac surgery and transcatheter structural valve interventions.心脏手术后及经导管结构性瓣膜介入治疗后无导线起搏器植入的结果。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2023 Nov;34(11):2216-2222. doi: 10.1111/jce.16074. Epub 2023 Sep 20.
9
Leadless versus transvenous single-chamber ventricular pacemakers: 3 year follow-up of the Micra CED study.无导线与经静脉单腔心室起搏器:Micra CED 研究 3 年随访。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2023 Apr;34(4):1015-1023. doi: 10.1111/jce.15863. Epub 2023 Feb 23.
10
Concomitant leadless pacing in pacemaker-dependent patients undergoing transvenous lead extraction for active infection: Mid-term follow-up.在因活动性感染而行经静脉导线拔除术的依赖起搏器患者中同期进行无导线起搏:中期随访。
Heart Rhythm. 2023 Jun;20(6):853-860. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2023.02.003. Epub 2023 Feb 9.