Suppr超能文献

经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)对复发性或难治性腹水之前大量腹水患者的益处:一项多中心队列研究。

Benefits of TIPS for Patients With Large Ascites Preceding Recurrent or Refractory ascites: A Multicenter Cohort Study.

作者信息

Xia Yifu, Tie Jun, Wang Guangchuan, Wu Hao, Zhuge Yuzheng, Yuan Xulong, Huang Guangjun, Li Zhen, Liu Xu, Chen Anbang, Zhang Linhao, Cai Zihao, Tang Chengwei, Zhang Chunqing

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.

Department of Gastroenterology, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong, China.

出版信息

J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2025 Jun;40(6):1574-1585. doi: 10.1111/jgh.16948. Epub 2025 Mar 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Patients with recurrent or refractory ascites can benefit from transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS). However, the value of TIPS for patients with large ascites remains unclear.

METHODS

This retrospective multicenter study included patients who underwent TIPS or medicine plus large-volume paracentesis (medicine + LVP) for ascites between January 2014 and December 2022 at five centers. The primary endpoint was recurrence or worsening of ascites. The secondary endpoints were liver-related death, all-cause hemorrhage, overt hepatic encephalopathy (OHE), and shunt dysfunction.

RESULTS

Overall, 724 patients were evaluated, including 373 patients with large ascites preceding recurrent or refractory ascites received TIPS (the LA-TIPS group), 282 patients with recurrent and refractory ascites received TIPS (the RA-TIPS group), and 69 patients with large ascites preceding recurrent or refractory ascites received medicine + LVP (the LA-M group). Patients in the LA-TIPS group had significantly lower incidences of recurrence or worsening of ascites (37.4% vs. 45.3%, p < 0.001), liver-related death (44.8% vs. 62.0%, p < 0.001), and OHE (47.3% vs. 60.3%, p < 0.001) than those in the RA-TIPS group. Meanwhile, patients in the LA-TIPS group had significantly lower incidences of recurrence or worsening of ascites (37.4% vs. 44.6%, p = 0.006) and hemorrhage (38.3% vs. 47.2%, p = 0.042), but a higher incidence of OHE (34.2% vs. 4.5%, p < 0.001) than those in the LA-M group.

CONCLUSIONS

In terms of controlling ascites, the benefit of TIPS was greater in patients with large ascites preceding recurrent or refractory ascites, suggesting that TIPS might be considered in patients with large ascites before they progress to recurrent or refractory stages.

摘要

背景与目的

复发性或难治性腹水患者可从经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)中获益。然而,TIPS对大量腹水患者的价值仍不明确。

方法

这项回顾性多中心研究纳入了2014年1月至2022年12月期间在五个中心因腹水接受TIPS或药物联合大量腹腔穿刺放液(药物+LVP)治疗的患者。主要终点是腹水复发或恶化。次要终点是肝相关死亡、全因出血、显性肝性脑病(OHE)和分流功能障碍。

结果

总体而言,共评估了724例患者,其中373例在复发性或难治性腹水之前有大量腹水的患者接受了TIPS(大量腹水-TIPS组),282例复发性和难治性腹水患者接受了TIPS(复发性难治性腹水-TIPS组),69例在复发性或难治性腹水之前有大量腹水的患者接受了药物+LVP(大量腹水-药物组)。大量腹水-TIPS组患者腹水复发或恶化(37.4%对45.3%,p<0.001)、肝相关死亡(44.8%对62.0%,p<0.001)和OHE(47.3%对60.3%,p<0.001)的发生率均显著低于复发性难治性腹水-TIPS组。同时,大量腹水-TIPS组患者腹水复发或恶化(37.4%对44.6%,p=0.006)和出血(38.3%对47.2%,p=0.042)的发生率显著低于大量腹水-药物组,但OHE发生率(34.2%对4.5%,p<0.001)高于大量腹水-药物组。

结论

在控制腹水方面,TIPS对复发性或难治性腹水之前有大量腹水的患者益处更大,这表明在大量腹水患者进展到复发性或难治性阶段之前,可能应考虑TIPS治疗。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验