Bentour Eleni, Papamanoli Eirini, Karoussis Ioannis K
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Thivon 2, 11527 Athens, Greece.
Dent J (Basel). 2025 Feb 26;13(3):99. doi: 10.3390/dj13030099.
The global adoption of dental implants has significantly reshaped modern dental practices, with the market projected to reach USD 16 billion by 2029. However, despite high success rates, dental implants can still be prone to complications, particularly when underlying causes of tooth loss, such as periodontal disease and bone loss, are not addressed. This paper explores the biological and mechanical considerations in the decision-making process between preserving a tooth through periodontal therapy or opting for extraction and implant placement. It also highlights the importance of a holistic approach that includes assessing the patient's oral health, periodontal status, and the biomechanical factors influencing tooth retention. Periodontal therapy has been proven to be highly effective, with both non-surgical and surgical therapies showing long-term efficacy in preserving natural teeth, especially in the presence of furcation involvement. Studies show that proper periodontal management, including regular maintenance therapy after the active therapy, significantly enhances tooth survival, even in cases of severe periodontitis. In contrast, dental implants, while effective, are not free of complications, mainly inflammatory peri-implant diseases, but also mechanical complications, which can compromise long-term outcomes. The paper reviews clinical studies on implant survival, demonstrating that periodontal therapy can sometimes offer a more cost-effective and biologically sound alternative to implant therapy, especially for teeth with severe attachment loss or furcation involvement. In conclusion, treatment decisions should be based on a comprehensive evaluation of clinical, biological, and patient-specific factors. By integrating regenerative therapies even in more compromised teeth and addressing the root causes of tooth loss, implant rehabilitation can be postponed for many years and offer a cost-effective and successful long-term treatment plan. This approach underscores the importance of individualized care in the evolving landscape of restorative dentistry and implantology.
种植牙在全球的广泛应用显著重塑了现代牙科诊疗方式,预计到2029年该市场规模将达到160亿美元。然而,尽管成功率很高,但种植牙仍可能容易出现并发症,尤其是在诸如牙周病和骨质流失等牙齿缺失的根本原因未得到解决的情况下。本文探讨了在通过牙周治疗保留牙齿还是选择拔牙并植入种植牙的决策过程中的生物学和力学考量因素。它还强调了采取整体方法的重要性,这种方法包括评估患者的口腔健康、牙周状况以及影响牙齿保留的生物力学因素。牙周治疗已被证明是非常有效的,非手术和手术治疗在保留天然牙方面都显示出长期疗效,尤其是在存在根分叉病变的情况下。研究表明,适当的牙周管理,包括在积极治疗后进行定期维护治疗,即使在重度牙周炎病例中也能显著提高牙齿的存活率。相比之下,种植牙虽然有效,但并非没有并发症,主要是种植体周围炎,还有机械并发症,这可能会影响长期效果。本文回顾了关于种植体存活率的临床研究,表明牙周治疗有时可以为种植治疗提供一种更具成本效益且生物学上合理的替代方案,特别是对于严重附着丧失或根分叉病变的牙齿。总之,治疗决策应基于对临床、生物学和患者特定因素的全面评估。通过在更严重受损的牙齿中整合再生治疗并解决牙齿缺失的根本原因,种植牙修复可以推迟多年,并提供一种具有成本效益且成功的长期治疗方案。这种方法强调了在不断发展的修复牙科和种植牙领域中个性化护理的重要性。