Piedrahita Sandoval Laura Elvira, Sotelo-Daza Jorge, Morales Viana Liliana Cristina, Aviles Gonzalez Cesar Ivan
Department of Nursing, Universidad del Valle, Cali 700000, Colombia.
Department of Nursing, University of Studies of Enna Kore, 94100 Enna, Italy.
Nurs Rep. 2025 Mar 4;15(3):88. doi: 10.3390/nursrep15030088.
In nursing practice, differences have been noted between the shared habitus acquired during academic training and professional practices within healthcare systems. In this context, nurses tend to experience an impact on their autonomy due to the ways in which their professional habitus has been established, which, in some way, alters the cultural capital acquired during their academic training. The objective of this study was to identify factors that facilitate and/or limit autonomy in nursing practice based on professional habitus. This research was conducted using a hermeneutic qualitative study framed within a critical approach that incorporated Bourdieu's theory of fields (habitus, field, and capital). This study included 11 registered nurses working in hospital settings, 17 nursing students, and six university professors. Data collection included 34 sociodemographic forms, 34 individual semi-structured interviews, and five conducted with an interview guide. The collected data were analyzed using an interpretative hermeneutic approach, integrating grounded theory and Bourdieu's theory of fields, focusing on the concepts of habitus, field, and capital. This study identified a central theme-clarification of the nurse's role (professional habitus)-alongside three subthemes: (1) strengthening the nursing identity (identity habitus), (2) optimizing nursing education (optimization habitus), and (3) reinforcing professional credibility (validation habitus). Autonomy was found to be influenced by hierarchical structures, power relations, and institutional constraints within the healthcare social field, which led to limitations in the accumulation of nurses' symbolic capital. The professional habitus of nurses is shaped by various elements within the healthcare social field. This field is constrained by hierarchical structures and factors such as subordination to the hegemonic biomedical discourse and the medical profession, limited recognition of humanized care, institutional restrictions on acknowledging the nursing process, and a lack of solidarity and leadership. These constraints ultimately hinder the accumulation of symbolic and social capital in nursing, leading to a loss of autonomy and hindering professional development.
在护理实践中,人们注意到在学术培训期间获得的共享惯习与医疗保健系统内的专业实践之间存在差异。在这种背景下,由于专业惯习的形成方式,护士往往会感受到其自主性受到影响,而这种方式在某种程度上改变了他们在学术培训期间获得的文化资本。本研究的目的是基于专业惯习确定促进和/或限制护理实践自主性的因素。 本研究采用了一种诠释性定性研究方法,该方法以批判性方法为框架,纳入了布迪厄的场域理论(惯习、场域和资本)。本研究包括11名在医院工作的注册护士、17名护理专业学生和6名大学教授。数据收集包括34份社会人口学表格、34次个人半结构化访谈,以及5次按照访谈指南进行的访谈。使用诠释性诠释方法对收集到的数据进行分析,将扎根理论与布迪厄的场域理论相结合,重点关注惯习、场域和资本的概念。 本研究确定了一个中心主题——护士角色的澄清(专业惯习),以及三个子主题:(1)强化护理身份(身份惯习),(2)优化护理教育(优化惯习),以及(3)增强专业可信度(验证惯习)。研究发现,自主性受到医疗保健社会场域内等级结构、权力关系和制度约束的影响,这导致护士象征资本积累受限。 护士的专业惯习受到医疗保健社会场域内各种因素的塑造。这个场域受到等级结构以及诸如从属于霸权性生物医学话语和医学专业、对人性化护理的认可有限、机构对护理过程认可的限制,以及缺乏团结和领导力等因素的制约。这些制约最终阻碍了护理领域象征资本和社会资本的积累,导致自主性丧失并阻碍专业发展。